Category Archives: Handouts

Lectures, asides, charts, excerpts from readings and other things I like to say over and over again in class.

Directions for Advisees: Preparing for Your Advising Appointment, Advisement Times

Hello, Daniel Nester Advisee!

This post explains what you need to do before your advising appointment on Advising Day, March 19, 2013, as well as outline how to set up an appointment with me. If you are a continuing advisee, you probably know the drill; if you are a new advisee, I urge you read all of these directions, and email me with any questions before we meet.

The goal of this 15- to 20-minute meeting is for me to advise you on which classes you should take, to approve your tentative schedule, and give you a PIN number so you can register for classes.We have a short time to accomplish this.This means student advisees need to do some work before we meet.

Advisement meetings will take place in my office Dolan Hall, 442 Western Avenue, 1st floor, Room #1 first on the right. My office phone number is 518-454-2812; my email is nesterd at strose dot edu.

Preparing for Your Advising Appointment

1. Email me to sign up for a meeting. The online sign-up sheet with appointment times is at the bottom of this post. Check this page and refresh it often. Advisement times are on a first-emailed, first served basis. There are as many appointment times as there are advisees, and then some.

2. Obtain and fill out a Course Registration Form. This is important. Barbara Dickson in the English Department has copies, as well as the Registrar in Saint Joseph Hall’s Student Solution Center. Here is a link to a PDF filePlease do not come to our advisement appointment without filling out the top matter of this form (i.e., your name and address) and courses you need to take.If we change your choices through the course of our meeting, we can simply cross one course out and add another.

Bottom line: bring the form and fill it out beforehand. If you do not come to our appointment without a filled-out form, I will have to reschedule our appointment. If you show up without a form or with simply a blank form, there’s no point in meeting, since a large part of our meeting will consist of me looking at you writing out your address.

3. Login to Banner (bannerweb.strose.edu) and review your Academic Progress report. Print the report out or download it for your files. Look at it and see if all of your classes are falling into the right places. Identify which areas in your English major requirements as well as your Liberal Education requirements you still need to fulfill.

3a. If you are a transfer student, looking at your Academic Progress Report is doubly important. Make sure that your transfer classes are there, that nothing looks strange or out of place, that your transferred classes are also “counting” for requirements you think they should be. For example, make sure that a class you thought fulfilled a requirement is not languishing in your General Electives on the bottom-right-hand corner of your report. You should also have a copy of your Statement of Transfer Credit report, which tallies up which classes you took at your previous institution, and tells you where it will apply in the College of Saint Rose degree requirement. If you transferred from some of the local colleges, the college keeps a Transfer Equivalency Database online.  This information is designed to help provide you with an unofficial evaluation of the courses and how they may transfer to the College. It’s helpful to see if any of your courses should have gone somewhere else on your degree requirements. Please come with these questions at our meeting, and we can figure out the next step.

Those of you who have already met me for an advising appointment know that I take ample notes in your student folder regarding what administrative tasks need to be done to make sure classes are falling in the right places in the Academic Progress Report, there are no clerical errors, etc.

4. Review the semester’s English Department Course Offerings and read the course descriptions. College-wide courses are at strose.edu/ugcourses. Look at your Academic Progress report and identify which kind of English courses you need to take. This is your major; read the courses descriptions and come with questions about particular courses.Figure out your schedule as far as days of the week are concerned.And finally: Have an idea of which English course(s) you would like to take next semester (as well as Summer, if applicable). Continue reading

Comments Off

Filed under Handouts

Poetry Performance Rubric

Handout_Poetry_Performance_Rubric_Adapted_from_POL_Page_1

Handout_Poetry_Performance_Rubric_Adapted_from_POL_Page_2

Handout_Poetry_Performance_Rubric_Adapted_from_POL [pdf]

Comments Off

Filed under English218Spring2013, Handouts, Poetry in Performance, Syllabus Statements

Rap the Lyrics Selections

Skeltonic rhymes begin around 1:20.

Comments Off

Filed under English218Spring2013, Handouts, Poetry in Performance

Writing Prompt: The Metaphor Quiz

This is what we call a “Metaphor Quiz.”

It’s a super way to write a praise poem for yourself, announcing yourself. It’s fun.

It also helps students understand what metaphor is, which is basically saying X is Y. It’s an analogy—like in SATs, A is to B as X is to Y, etc.—but it’s more than that.  Metaphor transforms language; it is a movement from one kind of world (literal) to another (poetic, image-driven, metaphorical). Metaphor comes from the Latin and Greek words for to move or carry over. A taxis in Italy sometimes has a sign affixed to its side: metaphora.

Metaphor is just one of a variety of uses of language in which what is communicated is not what the words mean literally.  We use indirect language every day: utterances that mean one thing, but say another. If you ask someone “what time is it?” that person will then look at his or her watch or cellphone; you didn’t ask her to do that, but that’s what she did after you asked the question. 

Metaphor takes it to another level: you talk about one thing by talking about another.  It’s one of the most powerful tools our language can have, and the wonderful thing about it is we pick up metaphor as soon as we acquire language; if anything, as we get older, we become resistant to metaphor, even suspicious of it.  We distrust what metaphors do because as we become more and more immersed in the literal world, it takes more effort to switch gears over to a world where one thing means or is something else. 

STEP ONE: For the following Metaphor Quiz questions, answer as yourself; or, if you wish, answer as a character you would like to use in a story or praise poem. If you really connect with a metaphor, or think it really works in your praise poem, expand on it.  Tell us why or describe the metaphorical object or quality in detail.

 

What color are you?

What musical instrument are you?

What facial expression are you?

What role in the school play are you?

What position on a soccer, football, baseball, basketball team are you?

Which celestial body, planet, or constellation are you?

Which musical group or singer are you?

What TV channel are you?

Which TV show are you?

What article of clothing are you?

Which brand or what kind of shoe are you?

Which body part are you?

What weapon are you?

What kind of house are you?

In your group of friends, are you the teacher or the student?

Are you a cat or a dog?

Are you a bicycle or a car?

What punctuation mark are you?

What kind of kiss or passionate embrace are you?

What kind of handshake are you?

What kind of song are you?

What font or typeface are you?

What kind of cellphone are you?

Which chemical or element are you?

Are you fire, water, ice, smoke?

Which movie star are you?

Which kind of tree are you?

Which vegetable?  Fruit?  Soup?  Meat?

What season are you?

What beverage or drink are you?

What town are you?

What kind of a book are you?

What kind of a magazine are you?

STEP TWO: Once you have your answers, turn each into a statement or lines that celebrate or talk about yourself. Let’s say your favorite color is magenta, your favorite drink is warm coffee, and so on. You could write.

I am magenta, a cup of warm coffee, a firm handshake, an apple in spring, a Honda with a bumping bass.

I am a son of South Jersey, a low rancher with thin walls.

STEP THREE: Make up new metaphor quiz questions. Mix. Match. Add adjectives. Make it rhyme. Don’t make it rhyme.

1 Comment

Filed under English218Spring2013, Handouts, Poetry in Performance, Writing Prompts

Writing the Praise Poem: Other Resources

The praise poem is an African tradition used by the tribe so that young adults begin and continue life knowing who they are and that they belong, they are loved and that they each have special gifts.  Like all of us – we tend to forget if we don’t have a touchstone to help us remember.  This is a verbal touchstone.

 

The praise poem–the ode, the homage, etc.–is one of those genres that does work you can actually feel. To praise increases your savoring and satisfaction in things; it cultivates admiration and gratitude, which generally increase your happiness (as “science has shown,” etc.) ; indeed, says Pindar, in a line that Stewart quotes, “Joy is the best healer.” On a more practical level, the praise poem makes sense to even the most unschooled readers, as a job worth doing. You see something you admire, you write a poem to praise it, and in so doing, you bring forth something in or from yourself that is worthy of the thing that you admire, sharing its qualities of sass or dazzle, flavor or prowess, all of which makes you admirable, too!
E.M. Selinger

Bob Holman’s awesome collection of praise poems

“Praise Poetry” from Ms. McClure’s Class website

“African Praise Poetry” from EdHelper.com

“How to Write a Praise Poem” from eHow

Writing Poetry Off the Page by Glenis Gale Redmond

Comments Off

Filed under English218Spring2013, Handouts, Poetry in Performance

Selected Poetic Terms for Poetry in Performance

Source: The Poetry Foundation’s Glossary Terms 

Allegory

An extended metaphor in which the characters, places, and objects in a narrative carry figurative meaning. Often an allegory’s meaning is religious, moral, or historical in nature. John Bunyan’s The Pilgrim’s Progress and Edmund Spenser’s The Faerie Queene are two major allegorical works in English.

Alliteration

The repetition of initial stressed, consonant sounds in a series of words within a phrase or verse line. Alliteration need not reuse all initial consonants; “pizza” and “place” alliterate. Example: “We saw the sea sound sing, we heard the salt sheet tell,” from Dylan Thomas’s “Lie Still, Sleep Becalmed.”

Allusion

A brief, intentional reference to a historical, mythic, or literary person, place, event, or movement. “The Waste Land,” T. S. Eliot’s influential long poem is dense with allusions. The title of Seamus Heaney’s autobiographical poem “Singing School” alludes to a line from W.B. Yeats’s “Sailing to Byzantium” (“Nor is there singing school but studying /Monuments of its own magnificence”).

Ambiguity

A word, statement, or situation with two or more possible meanings is said to be ambiguous. As poet and critic William Empson wrote in his influential book Seven Types of Ambiguity (1930), “The machinations of ambiguity are among the very roots of poetry.” A poet may consciously join together incompatible words to disrupt the reader’s expectation of meaning, as e.e. cummings does in [anyone lived in a pretty how town]. The ambiguity may be less deliberate, steered more by the poet’s attempts to express something ineffable, as in Gerard Manley Hopkins’s “The Windhover.” At the sight of a bird diving through the air, the speaker marvels, “Brute beauty and valor and act, oh, air, pride, plume here / Buckle!” The ambiguity of this phrase lies in the exclamation of “buckle”: The verb could be descriptive of the action, or it could be the speaker’s imperative. In both cases, the meaning of the word is not obvious from its context. “Buckle” could mean “fall” or “crumple,” or it could describe the act of clasping armor and bracing for battle.

 

Anaphora

The repetition of a word or words at the beginning of successive phrases, clauses, or lines. See Paul Muldoon’s “As,” William Blake’s “The Tyger,” or much of Walt Whitman’s poetry, including “I Sing the Body Electric.”

Articulation and Voice

From Poetry Out Loud: Volume, pace, rhythm, intonation, and proper pronunciation. 

Project to the audience. Capture the attention of everyone, including the people in the back row. However, don’t mistake yelling for good projection.

Proceed at a fitting and natural pace. Avoid nervously rushing through the poem. Do not speak so slowly that the language sounds unnatural or awkward.

With rhymed poems, be careful not to recite in a sing-song manner.

Make sure you know how to pronounce every word in your poem. Articulate.

Qualities of a strong recitation: All words pronounced correctly, and the volume, rhythm, and intonation greatly enhance the recitation. Pacing appropriate to the poem.

Continue reading

Comments Off

Filed under English218Spring2013, Handouts, Poetry in Performance

How to Record a Performance for our Class [Poetry in Performance]

I was realizing that if I wanted to I could use the telephone instead of writing the poem, and so Personism was born. It’s a very exciting movement which will undoubtedly have lots of adherents. It puts the poem squarely between the poet and the person, Lucky Pierre style, and the poem is correspondingly gratified. The poem is at last between two persons instead of two pages. In all modesty, I confess that it may be the death of literature as we know it. 

Frank O’Hara, “Personism: A Manifesto”

One of the main components of the Poetry in Performance class is documenting our performances and posting them online. It’s in this way that we make most of our performances public performances. In the past, students have audioblogged performances by calling a phone number and leaving a recording that was in turn posted on the web.

Starting in 2013, we’re doing things a bit different by making recordings on our own and then uploading them to folders online in a folder in our shared Dropbox. Feel free to use any digital recording device at your disposal: a smartphone, computer, an online voice mail system such as Google Voice, or digital recorder. I can help you with determining the best recording options and choices.

What follows are directions and tips on recording your performance.

  1. First things first: make sure you do use only your first name and last initial, both in the file name and on your recording. 
  2. When you record your performance, say, “This is Virginia W., and I will read/perform Robert Lowell’s “Skunk Hour.” 
  3. Once you have recorded your performance, you need to rename your file in a similar fashion: use your last initial, followed by your full first name, and the last name of the author whose poem you are reading. In our example from above, you would name your file WVirginiaLowell.
  4. When you beging reading your own piece, use a distinctive word or two that would set it apart from others.
  5. Make sure you listen to each other’s performances! One of the main ways we learn from each other on how to develop our performance style is listening to each other.
  6.  

Comments Off

Filed under English218Spring2013, Handouts, Poetry in Performance

Excerpt from Ulric Neisser’s “Five Kinds of Self-Knowledge”

Neisser, Ulric. “The Five Kinds of Self-Knowledge.” Philosophical Psychology 1.1 (1988): 35-59.

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, English251Fall2012, Handouts

Ben Yagoda and Dan DeLorenzo’s truthiness point system for memoirs

How true does a memoir have to be? That question has been the basis of an ongoing debate kicked off by the revelation, five years ago, that much of James Frey’s bestselling “A Million Little Pieces” was made up.

Unfortunately, it has never been adequately answered. Commentators have tended to gravitate to oversimplifications: one side asserting that every word in a book sold in the non-fiction section of the store must be fact-checked and airtight, the other that “memoir” implies memory, which implies a not-the-truth-but-my-truth subjectivity bordering on carte blanche.

A better, more nuanced answer would recognize the complexity of the issue. Here’s a try: Inaccuracy is a problem in a memoir based on the extent to which it gets details as well as larger truths demonstrably wrong, depicts identifiable people in a negative light, fails to recognize the limits of memory, is poorly written, is self-serving, or otherwise wears its agenda on its sleeve. The more of these things it does and the more egregiously it does them, the bigger the problem is.

We decided to devise a way to apply these standards to the truthy aspects of memoir. Here’s the (half-facetious, but also half-serious) scoring system we came up with.

Read the rest of the story here.

Comments Off

Filed under English311Fall2012, Handouts

Argument Links

“Argument” from University of North Carolina Chapel Hill

“Logical Fallacies and the Art of Debate” from Glen Whitman California State-Northridge

The Fallacy Files

 

 

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Handouts

The Researched, Ridiculous Proposal Assignment

Description of Assignment

For this assignment, you will be assigned a topic from this List of Ridiculous Paper Topics. The topic will not make obvious sense. It will be, in fact, ridiculous. Your job will be to work as an advocate for this ridiculous proposal. Sometimes Come up with an argument that not only makes sense, but one that is supported through research and supporting points. It may not still make linear sense, but this will be, hopefully, a fun way to stretch your research and writing muscles.

This is an argumentative essay—one that has a clearly stated thesis and presents an argument on a specific topic.

Readings

What is Argumentation?; OWL’s Argumentative Essay

Anne Trubek, “Proper Spelling? Its Tyme to Get Luce!”

David Books, “Nonconformity is Skin Deep”

PJ O’Rourke, “An Argument in Favor of Automobiles Vs. Passengers” (in Readings folder)

Dude dates at the Week-by-Week Class Plan

Requirements, Specifications.Must all of the following as part of the Rough and Final Draft of your essay.

Format. Must have Works Cited. MLA format, in text and Works Cited. 750-900 words.

Use three supporting points. This is the standard way of outlining an argument.

Use outside sources. One of those supporting points must integrate a peer-reviewed, scholarly source from the library’s academic databases. Ideally, you’re using at least three outside sources total that are cited in-text.

Consider the opposition. Have a section–at least a paragraph–in which you consider the opposite of your thesis, the opposing view, and explain why, in the end, this is not your opinion.

At one point in your paper, ask yourself a question.  It can be any question, but preferably as part of one of the points in your paper.  Then, attempt to answer it.  One construction might be, “Why am I saying such-and-such?  I think it is because of such-and-such” (fill in those “such-and-such” parts with your own thoughts and words.

Begin with a Working Thesis. After you do your research, you should be able to build up to a working idea, know in which direction your argument will go.

Make a Presentation. This is a three- to five-minute presentation in which you present your working thesis as well as prospective supporting points.

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Handouts

Say, Mean, Matter

SAY MEAN MATTER
What does the text say?What happened?Cite text (quotation) or paraphrase.This is significant sentence, passage, line that
provides insight into
the theme, subject,
tone, your overall interpretation of the work.
What do you think the author means?How do you interpret this?Place it in context of the plot, work, author’s other works, the overall culture. This is where we put your paraphrase. Why might it matter, resonate, to me or others?Why might this be important?What is the significance?What are the implications?Take a special look at the use of language–particular words, phrases, the tone of the work, symbolism or metaphorsConnect this passage with the meanings of other passages.
This is sometimes called “scaffolding,” “sandwiching,” or, the good old standby, the rhetorical triangle.

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Handouts

What is Oral History?

The Oral History Association’s Principles and Best Practices

Judith Moyer’s Step-by-Step Guide to Oral History

New York State Archives’ Documentary Heritage Program Grants

Council of Ontario Drama and Dance Educators’ Verbatim Theatre

Comments Off

Filed under English251Fall2012, Handouts, Interviews and Oral History

PowerPoint Karaoke

One way to get used to public speaking, timed slides, and being in front of projected images is to try some warm ups.. To accomplish this, we’re going to do a little PowerPoint Karaoke in class. PowerPoint Karaoke is actually a real thing. It may not be a phenomenon sweeping the nation, but PowerPoint Karaoke events have been held in theaters and bars, conventions. And it fits our class purposes quite nicely.

Here are the steps.

1. We each write will down a topic on an index card. Something general that anyone can talk about. Examples: College, Business, Philosophy, Sociology, Studying, Food, The Outdoors, Georg Hegel’s Theory of the Dialectic. Just kidding with the last one.

2. We shuffle the deck of those cards and pass out one to each student. You then have 3-5 minutes to come up with a short talk on that subject—about a minute and a half. Don’t bother memorizing it, because it will change.

3. The speakers will then line up, two or three at a time. In rapid succession, slides timed at the Pecha Kucha-friendly 20 seconds each will be projected on the screen.

4. Each speaker will give a short talk about his or her given subject as five slides go by, followed by a blank interstitial slide, also 20 seconds long, that reads, “Next speaker, please.”

5. That’s your cue to go. The next speaker can then start his or her talk over the “Next speaker, please” slide, as time allows.

6. Here’s the karaoke part: five slides will accompany your short talk. Your task is to adjust the content and tone of your talk according to those five random slides. Do as best as you can.

7. No laughing or giggling. You get a zero if you do that.

8. Speak loudly, slowly, distinctly. No rushing. Take this assignment as seriously as you would a “real” presentation in any class.

9. Seriously: no giggling.

Links on PowerPoint Karaoke:

 

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Handouts

Annotations to Susan Sontag’s “Notes on ‘Camp’”

Roundtable discussion with Joan Acocella, Robert Boyers, Roger Copeland, Philip Lopate, and James Miller. New York Observer article here.

“I’m finishing the ['Story of O'] review which has turned into a 35-page essay. It’s ok. Still, I don’t believe a word I’m saying.”

–Susan Sontag, journal entry dated Feb. 22, 1967, 3 a.m.

Feminist discourse finds political significance in camp for similar reasons. Pamela Robertson argues that camp icons – she cites Madonna and Mae West – can and should use pop culture as a political and critical instrument in the deconstruction of masculinity and femininity. Through identification with these icons, women can escape the bounds of reductive views of femininity:

Through cinematic and extracinematic identificatory fantasies and practices, West’s female fans “went West,” gaining access to a form of camp that enabled them to distance themselves from sex and gender stereotypes and to view women’s everyday roles as female impersonation. (Robertson 53)

But: is camp inherently subversive?

–from Johanna King-Slutzky’s page on Camp, The Chicago School of Media Theory’s

CAMP: A sensibility that revels in artifice, stylization, theatricalization, irony, playfulness, and exaggeration rather than content, as Susan Sontag famously defined the term in her short essay, “Notes on ‘Camp.’” According to Sontag, “Camp sensibility is disengaged, depoliticized—or at least apolitical”; however, some postmodernists, feminists, and queer theorists have explored the ways that camp (for example, the drag show) can trouble the belief that gender is “natural” or inherent, and can therefore work against heteronormativity. As Sontag argues, “Not all homosexuals have Camp taste. But homosexuals, by and large, constitute the vanguard—and the most articulate audience—of Camp.” By exaggerating sexual characteristics and personality mannerisms, such queer-inflected camp could be said to contend that all behavior is really performative. Camp is also tied to postmodernism. As Sontag puts it, “Camp sees everything in quotation marks. It’s not a lamp, but a ‘lamp; not a woman, but a ‘woman.’” In this way, the term resembles Linda Hutcheon’s very similar understanding of parody, which Hutcheon offers as one of the major characteristics of postmodern art. (See the Hutcheon module on parody.) Camp’s relationship to kitsch is a close one; camp could be said to be a self-conscious kitsch. As Sontag writes, “Many examples of Camp are things which, from a ‘serious’ point of view, are either bad art or kitsch,” though she also acknowledges that “some art which can be approached as Camp… merits the most serious admiration and study.” Sontag also distinguishes between “pure camp,” which amounts to a kitsch that takes itself so seriously that we can now see it as hilarious (in other words, the camp sensibility is on the side of the audience not the author of the work), and “Camp which knows itself to be camp” and is, therefore, already making fun of itself.

–from page on “Camp,” Dino Franco Felluga’s Introductory Guide to Critical Theory

4.

Tiffany lamps

Scopitome films

Aubrey Beardsley

King Kong

La Lupe

Lynn [Lynd] Ward’s novel in woodcuts, God’s Man

9.

Greta Garbo

Continue reading

Comments Off

Filed under English311Fall2012, Handouts

Copyright and Fair Use in the College Classroom

The cover for Bound By Law, a Fair Use comic book [link]

 

Some of the questions we will address include:

Can I photocopy magazine articles and distribute them to my students?

Can I have the ITS – Media Center videotape a television program to be shown in one of my classes?

Can I post copyrighted materials on my Blackboard course?

Can I show a videotape I rented from Blockbuster or Netflix, on campus?

The answer to each of the preceding questions is “Maybe”.

– Information Technology Services email promoting copyright workshops for the College community

“Digital technology has transformed media into a language of images,” said Virginia Kuhn, Associate Director of the Institute for Multimedia Literacy at the University of Southern California.

“But there’s no liberating potential in literacy unless you can both consume it and add to the discourse. What is an available resource through which to speak? It’s images. If you’re banned from using [images], you can only use part of the available alphabet. That’s effectively silencing people.”

To ensure that complete alphabet, United States citizens can be protected under Fair Use. The legal provision permits people to use copyrighted material for “criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research” without the author’s permission, meaning student work is often protected.

– USA Today, “Why every college student should understand Fair Use and copyrights”

The Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Media Literacy Education [link]

University of Maryland [link]

Amherst College [link]

Comments Off

Filed under Blogging, English105Fall2012, Handouts, Syllabi and Class Plans

Powerful Points about PowerPoint

From “We Have Met The Enemy and He is PowerPoint,” New York Times.

Edward Tufte, and excerpt from a talk, “Beautiful Evidence.”

 

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Handouts

The Twenty Most Common Grammatical Errors

In a study on error, composition scholars Andrea Lunsford and Robert Connors found that writers tend to make the same twenty grammatical mistakes over and over again. These twenty grammatical mistakes comprise 91.5 percent of all errors in student writing. If you can help writers control these common errors, you will have alleviated most of the grammatical problems that plague student writing. The most common errors are (in order of frequency in which they occur):

1) Missing comma after introductory phrases.

2) Vague pronoun reference.

3) Missing comma in compound sentence.

4) Wrong word.

5) No comma in nonrestrictive relative clauses.

6) Wrong/missing inflected ends.

7) Wrong/missing preposition.

8) Comma splice.

9) Possessive apostrophe error.

10) Tense shift.

11) Unnecessary shift in person.

12) Sentence fragment.

13) Wrong tense or verb form.

14) Subject-verb agreement.

15) Missing comma in a series.

16) Pronoun agreement error.

17) Unnecessary commas with restrictive clauses.

18) Run-on, fused sentence.

19) Dangling, misplaced modifier.

20) Its/it’s error.

The Everyday Writer.” Book-Specific Resources. 24 September 2012 < http://bcs.bedfordstmartins.com/everyday_writer3e/20errors/default.asp>.

Custom short link: http://tinyurl.com/20errors.

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Handouts

“Show, Don’t Tell”

Show, Don’t Tell.” It’s a time-worn writing workshop dictum.

But what does it mean?

Telling ‘relies on simple exposition,’ explains science fiction writer Robert J. Sawyer writes. It also could be a statement that tells us about something–a speaker’s state of mind, for example, or an opinion. Telling often has the effect of holding readers’ hands, telling them to feel the same way.

Grandmom’s funeral was a really sad day for me, and one that I’ll never forget.

Showing, on the other hand, employs detail, description, weather, sounds.

It rained on the day of her funeral. We carried the casket out to the hearse as the church organ still played an old hymn—I think it’s called “Be Not Afraid.”  I had to carry a bit more than my allotted load, since my uncle, a retired cop, had just had knee surgery but still wanted to be a pallbearer.

The language is more detailed in the second example, and has the added effect of evoking a feeling of what is was like that day, and gives readers room for their own reactions.

My Uncle Bob is a funny dude.

How is funny? What kind of funny are we talking about? Do I just take your word for it?

My Uncle Bob turned around, and, in one motion, threw the ping pong ball right into Aunt Chrissy’s V-neck sweater.  She had to go in the bathroom to get the ball out of her bra.

Oh, I see. He’s funny in a throw-ping pong-balls-down-people’s-shirts way. Gotcha.

Showing isn’t necessary all the time, and it isn’t always better. Writing is an inexact science. Still, since for many writers it’s easier to tell, to provide dry information. “Show, don’t tell,” Seth Fried writes, “is incredibly valuable advice. After all, without it any book could just be replaced by its jacket copy.”

Both showing and telling “have a value in storytelling,” Chuck Wendig writes:

Sometimes you want to drop the audience into the space with no easy answers and have them feel around for themselves. Other times you need to take a moment, sit their ass in a chair, and give them a right-good talking-to. You need to tell them what’s up. You need them — if they’re going to proceed any further — to understand the sticky diplomatic relations between the jellyfish-like citizens of the Blumzorp Conglomerate and the constantly-micturating Night Goblins of the Moons of Hong.

I really like this explanation from Grammar Girl.

Are there arguments in favor of telling? Sure.

Here’s one from Phillip Lopate:

The nonfiction student’s reluctance to provide summary and analysis shows the markings of that nefarious taboo of writing programs everywhere: “Show, Don’t Tell.” Leaving aside how much this simplistic precept has validity even in fiction (consider the strong essayistic tendency in novelists from Fielding, George Eliot, Balzac, Tolstoy down to Proust, Mann, Musil, and Kundera), I would argue that literary nonfiction is surely the one arena in which it is permissible to “tell.” In personal essays and memoirs, we must rely on the subjective voice of the first-person narrator to guide us, and if that voice can never explain, summarize, interpret, or provide a larger sociological or historical context for the material, we are in big trouble. We are reduced to groping in a dark tunnel, able to see only two feet in front of us. (The current fashion for present tense helps writing students sustain the illusion that they are still in the dreamy trance-state that a recalled memory resembles, even as it destroys the possibility of judging its meaning through hindsight.) Now, I don’t deny it can be exciting to grope myopically in the dark, for a while; but any autobiographical narrative of extended length may need to vary its handling of time; to alternate here-and-now moments with synoptic ones.

Another, from “Why “Show, Don’t Tell” Is the Great Lie of Writing Workshops” by Joshua Henkin

If you ask me, the real reason people choose to show rather than tell is that it’s so much easier to write “the big brown torn vinyl couch” than it is to describe internal emotional states without resorting to canned and sentimental language. You will never be told you’re cheesy if you describe a couch, but you might very well be told you’re cheesy if you try to describe loneliness. The phrase “Show, don’t tell,” then, provides cover for writers who don’t want to do what’s hardest (but most crucial) in fiction.

 

Comments Off

Filed under Handouts

What are the Implications of Taking Down an Oral History?

Informed consent form and Institutional Review Boards.

Even in a class that is creative writing-based as this, where “research” is really a collaboration between interviewer and interviewee, the people we interview are regarded, in a very legalistic sense, as “human subjects.” The informed consent form for, say, a drug experiment with treatment and control groups fall under this same category.

Review Boards have generally been exempting oral history projects from the strictest of reviews and the most legalistic of informed consents. Still, for many oral history projects, especially if they are centered around research projects, an informed consent is a way to negotiate the relationship between interviewer (called the narrator, researcher, etc.) and interviewee (called the subject). An informed consent form from a project in Foothills College in Los Altos, California has a section in their form called “Why do we use this oral history release form“; here’s the first paragraph:

Oral history involves interviewing individuals with the explicit intention of creating a historical document that will be preserved (generally in the form of the audio recording as well as the transcription of what was spoken) for the use of future researchers. We work by the principle of informed consent, which means that each individual being interviewed fully understands the purposes and potential uses of the interview, as well as their freedom not to answer some questions and their right to restrict access to some portions of what was recorded, and that the narrator realizes that rather than being anonymous, their identification will be retained for the use of future researchers, who may draw from the interview to produce historical writings.

Our use of legal releases, and our motivation for wanting oral history interviews to be retained in a historical repository, are linked (1) to our desire to provide access and (2) to comply with laws and ethical standards on issues of evidence and copyright, as further described below. (1.) If a researcher makes explicit use of an interview in written work (either by direct quotation and paraphrase), the interview should be cited in a footnote, so that others can identify and locate that information within the framework of extant evidence. That historical reference to oral history materials is not possible if the materials are kept in private hands. (2.) Each of the parties to an oral history interview (the narrator and the interviewer) holds the copyright to the products of their participation in the interview (for example, the interview, recorded words, photographs, and written materials), and thus both must sign an agreement that establishes access for those who in the future want to use the products of the interview. If the interviews are deposited in a library or archives, legal releases will establish ownership of the copyright and the terms of access and reproduction; and if the interviews are published, legal releases will satisfy publishers’ concerns over copyright. We do not view this copyright as being granted exclusively to the repository; each of the parties to the interview has the right to use their own works as they see fit.

That’s a great addition to an otherwise legalistic form that addresses how each “party” has a role in an interview. It’s also not the best way to start an interview session, where the goal is to make everyone comfortable and revelatory. Zachary M. Schrag, an Assistant Professor of History at George Mason University who studies consent forms in the humanities and social sciences, offers a critique of consent forms on his website. In that post, alternatives to the contract-like arrangement that the form may present to a subject.

Comments Off

Filed under English251Fall2012, Handouts, Interviews and Oral History

Commonplace Books

Anonymous manuscript containing poems by vario...

Anonymous manuscript containing poems by various authors, in various hands. Includes Shakespeare’s second sonnet. Page/Caption: [2v-3r] 17th century 1 v., (190 p.) 13 x 7 cm. Subjects: English poetry Genre: Commonplace books Manuscripts Poems Cite as: James Marshall and Marie-Louise Osborn Collection, Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University Repository: Rare Book & Manuscript Library, Yale University Bibliographic Record Number: 2031683 Call Number: Osborn b205 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

A Brief History and Explanation of Commonplaces

Formerly  Book of common places. orig. A book in which ‘commonplaces’ or passages important for reference were collected, usually under general heads; hence, a book in which one records passages or matters to be especially remembered or referred to, with or without arrangement.

From  The Oxford English Dictionary.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971. First usage recorded: 1578.

Writing in the New York Review of Books, Robert Darnton explains that that common-place books once required

a special way of taking in the printed word. Unlike modern readers, who follow the flow of a narrative from beginning to end, early modern Englishmen read in fits and starts and jumped from book to book. They broke texts into fragments and assembled them into new patterns by transcribing them in different sections of their notebooks. Then they reread the copies and rearranged the patterns while adding more excerpts. Reading and writing were therefore inseparable activities. They belonged to a continuous effort to make sense of things, for the world was full of signs: you could read your way through it; and by keeping an account of your readings, you made a book of your own, stamped with your personality… By selecting and arranging snippets from a limitless stock of literature, early modern Englishmen gave free play to a semi-conscious process of ordering experience. The elective affinities that bound their selection into patterns reveal an epistemology — a process of knowing — at work below the surface.

Darnton, Robert. “Extraordinary Commonplaces.” New York Review of Books. 47(20): 21 December 2000, 82, 86.

To be sure, commonplaces were of a different time. We have the internet, for one, a place where whole chunks of information and texts and images are accessible to anyone with a connection. In the 18th and 19th centuries, though, access to books, be it bookstores or libraries, was limited in both quantity and expense, and there were no scanners or copy machines. There really wasn’t. I’m not kidding about this. No cellphones, either.

When readers came across something interesting or moving or special, they copied them out in their commonplace book. Sometimes it doubled as a journal or diary, with comments and notes by the book’s owner. Other times, it was more of a scrapbook. Writing passages out by hand gave readers a tactile feel for another’s words, something many fear we’re losing today.

The commonplaces themselves became a work of art in their own right. Researchers and scholars often examine author’s commonplace books to get background on what they were reading and thinking about, it’s an invaluable resource. A 2001 show on commonplace books at Yale’s Beinecke Library displayed commonplaces from everyone from Seneca to John Locke and W.H. Auden, and from Ben Jonson, Francis Bacon to Jonathan Swift. The accompanying monograph from the show has some helpful notes on commonplace books in general:

For centuries, philosophers, scholars, lawyers, doctors, theologians, artists, and poets have gathered the memorable thoughts and words of others and organized them in commonplace books. These treasure houses of ancient and modern knowledge preserve quotations, anecdotes, maxims, jokes, verses, and magical spells, as well as astrological predictions, medicinal and culinary recipes, devotional texts, and mathematical tables–in short, subject matter of every stripe. As such, they have played an integral and abiding role in Western intellectual life throughout the ages.

Erasmus on the making of commonplace books. His De Copia is considered a commonplace classic:

 As they flit like so many little bees between Greek and Latin authors of every species, here noting down something to imitate, here culling some notable saying to put into practice in their behavior, there getting by heart some witty anecdote to relate among their friends, you would swear you were watching the Muses at graceful play in the lovely pastures of Mount Helicon, gathering flowers and marjoram to make well-woven garlands.

Modern Commonplaces

The impulse to make commonplaces lives on. Can you think of any examples that might exist on, say, the internet?

I can.

Commonplace books. Hereherehereherehere.

Comments Off

Filed under Handouts

Punctuating Around Quotation Marks

The following post is adapted and quotes from this APA Style Blog post by Chelsea Lee. Her post begins by explaining the difference between American and British styles of puncutation. It’s helpful for student writers to notice this, especially when you are reading books written and/or published in the United Kingdom. Let’s take a look:

 

Style issue American Style British Style
To enclose a quotation, use… Double quotation marks Single quotation marks
To enclose a quotation within a quotation, use… Single quotation marks Double quotation marks
Place periods and commas… Inside quotation marks Outside quotation marks
Place other punctuation (colons, semi-colons, question marks, etc.)… Outside quotation marks* Outside quotation marks*

*Place other punctuation inside quotation marks when that punctuation is part of what is being quoted, such as a quoted question.

No matter which style guide you are working from–APA Style, Chicago, MLA–you’ll be using American-style punctuation. If someone gets this wrong in a draft, why I usually mark in my Word comments is the following:

Quotations, punctuation inside.  Periods and commas go inside “quotation marks.”  In England, it’s “outside”.  But we live in the USA!  “Hooray!”

(I try to keep it light, as you can see.) Lee’s blog post has another table, which I am quoting in full. I hope this explains many of the confusions regarding punctuation in- or outside punctuation marks.

Punctuation mark In relation to closing quotation mark, place it… Example Notes
Period Inside Participants who kept dream diaries described themselves as “introspective” and “thoughtful.”
Comma Inside Many dream images were characterized as “raw,” “powerful,” and “evocative.”
Parentheses Outside Barris argues that “dreams express and work with the logic of gaining a sense of and a relation to ourselves, our lives, or our sense of reality as a whole” (4). Notice how the citation is outside the last quotation mark and inside the period. This is a common mistake.
Semi-colon Outside At the beginning of the study, participants described their dream recall rate as “low to moderate”; at the end, they described it as “moderate to high.”  This make sense if you think about it: the semi-colon is not part of the quotation.
Colon Outside Participants stated they were “excited to begin”: We controlled for participants’ expectations in our study. This make sense if you think about it: the colon is not part of the quotation.
Question mark or exclamation point (part of quoted material) Inside The Dream Questionnaire items included “How often do you remember your dreams?” and “What do you most often dream about?” We found intriguing results. When a quotation ending in a question mark or exclamation point ends a sentence, no extra period is needed.
Question mark or exclamation point (not part of quoted material) Outside How will this study impact participants who stated at the outset, “I never remember my dreams”? We hypothesized their dream recall would increase. One way to explain this: this is your question being posed, not what you’re quoting.
Quotation within a quotation + period or comma Inside Some participants were skeptical about the process: “I don’t put any stock in these ‘dream diaries.’” Ah, the quote-within-a-quote scenario. When multiple quotation marks are used for quotations within quotations, keep the quotation marks together (put periods and commas inside both; put semi-colons, colons, etc., outside both).

If you have other questions or scenarios, please ask, and I will add to this post accordingly.

Comments Off

Filed under Handouts

The Short Review Assignment

Due: XXXX. Name document LastnameFirstnameShortReview and XXXX

Description:

Write a review of no fewer than 275 words and no more than 300 words. Examples: episode of a television show, a new CD by a recording artist, a book, performance, or online video. These should be recent—released, performed, or aired in the past six months. The writing is informal and will not include academic citations.

That assignment description is deceptively simple and straightforward. It will most likely be the hardest assignment to do well.

If you just go by the word count of this assignment, you might think you can dash off this assignment in less than an hour. More than likely for you, this won’t be the case, or the result will be less than excellent.

In this assignment, for example, you should include all the relevant expository details you think your readers will need. You might need to describe a television show (type of show, history, current state of its ratings or quality), add context (is this the artist’s debut, comeback attempt, or a departure?), summarize (general plot of the book/TV show/movie), background information for the laymen (is this a ballet, jazz, modern dance performance), or generally describe its production or the producer (if it’s a Funny or Die video, for instance, that would bear mentioning).

Other things to keep in mind:

Cut out all unnecessary language

Do this to keep inside your word count, but it’s also about keeping your writing going at an economic pace. If you are going to write, “I think the latest Beastie Boys release is the best they have done since Check Your Head,” chop it down to its essential parts. Consider the kind of shorthand that review writers use. Examples:

“The latest Beastie Boys release is the best they have done since Check Your Head.” (Took out “I think,” which is understood.)

“The latest Beasties release is the best they’ve done since Check Your Head.” (Shortened to Beasties, made “they have” a contraction.)

“The latest Beasties is the best since Check Your Head.” (Took out “they’ve done,” since who would have “done” this besides the Beasties?)

Review something you know really well, but keep in mind your readers don’t know it as well as you. This might seem understood, but you need to keep in mind your audience won’t be as up-to-date on what you are writing about; this is the reason why people read reviews! See the part about expository details above.

Thread an idea throughout your review.

This might mean doing some research. If you are writing about the new Beastie Boys, you might talk about how they haven’t released a CD in a while because one of their members, Adam Yauch, was diagnosed with cancer and was receiving treatment. You could also mention that, shortly after the diagnosis, Jay-Z paid tribute to them at the music festival “All Points West,” which might indicate that the Beasties are still relevant. This would give some context when you talk about their latest CD, Hot Sauce Committee Part Two.

You could use this idea-threading to introduce an idea you have had about your subject. Maybe you have always thought John Mayer was a better guitar player than people give him credit for, that publicity about his love life overshadows his musicianship. Use that as your connecting thoughts.

Have a lede/lead that interests your reader

So maybe you don’t want to go the thread-an-idea route. Fine.  You can still write an able review without having an overall concept. But one thing you do want to include is an opening, or lead (called a lede in old school journalism, so as to not confuse with the real lead material used in typesetting). A lead opens your piece, grabs attention of your readers. Examples? Begin with a question: Have people forgotten about the Beastie Boys? Or begin with a bold statement: People have forgotten about the Beastie Boys. Or begin with a story: When Jay-Z subbed for the Beasties at the 2009 All Points West, it reminded us of how important they are to the history of hip-hop.

Examples of Published Short Reviews: 

Time Out New York review of new CD by The Strokes

Time Out New York review of latest Kanye West

Time Out New York review of latest Katy Perry

It’s a bit longer than your assignment, but The Onion AV Club’s review of 16 and Pregnant is a great example of TV reviewing with an idea threaded through.

At 317 words, this review of Scream 4, also from The Onion AV Club, presents an idea about sequels in general as well as the work of the screenplay of the movie in particular.

Recent Onion movie reviews.

Time Out New York book reviews.

Comments Off

Filed under Handouts, Writing Prompts

Getting Poetry Published: Notes for Talk

The following are notes for a talk I did for the Hudson Valley Writers Guild on April 9, 2011. I’m keeping it up here because I think it might offer some decent advice.  For another take on this subject, I highly recommend Lynne Barrett‘s “What Editors Want: A Must-Read for Writers Submitting to Literary Magazines,” published in The Review Review.

Where do you find good places to send your work to?

1. Look in anthologies. The Best American Poetry anthology series, for example, mentions in which literary journals the poems originally appears, along with their mailing address. Their website offers the tables of contents for each volume, linking to each journal’s website: 2010 edition |  2009 edition | 2007 edition | 2006 edition |2005 edition. Continue reading

Comments Off

Filed under Handouts

Pecha Kucha Presentations: Some Samples

http://pecha-kucha.org/embed.swf?id=195

http://pecha-kucha.org/embed.swf?id=81

http://pecha-kucha.org/embed.swf?id=100

http://pecha-kucha.org/embed.swf?id=58

http://pecha-kucha.org/embed.swf?id=66

http://pecha-kucha.org/embed.swf?id=80

http://pecha-kucha.org/embed.swf?id=230

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Handouts

Narrative Essay: Workshop Questions

1. Expository Details: Who, What, When, Where, Why.

2. Theme/Lesson/Wisdom/Musing/Retrospective Voice.

3. Scene/Narration/Plotting.

4. Mechanics: Paragraphing/Sentence Structure/Punctuation.

Comments Off

Filed under Handouts

The Persuasive Essay Assignment

Write a persuasive essay—one that has a clearly stated thesis and presents an argument on a specific topic. This topic is your choice, or I might assign you a Ridiculous Paper Topics. Either way, you develop this into an idea that is your own.

 

Background Readings

What is Argumentation?

OWL’s Argumentative Essay

Exemplar Texts

Anne Trubek, “Proper Spelling? Its Tyme to Get Luce!”

David Books, “Nonconformity is Skin Deep”

 

Requirements. You must  all of the following as part of the Rough and Final Draft of your essay.

Use three supporting points. This is the standard way of outlining an argument.

Use outside sources. One of those supporting points must integrate a peer-reviewed, scholarly source from the library’s academic databases. Ideally, you’re using at least three outside sources total that are cited in-text.

Consider the opposition. Have a section–at least a paragraph–in which you consider the opposite of your thesis, the opposing view, and explain why, in the end, this is not your opinion.

At one point in your paper, ask yourself a question.  It can be any question, but preferably as part of one of the points in your paper.  Then, attempt to answer it.  One construction might be, “Why am I saying such-and-such?  I think it is because of such-and-such” (fill in those “such-and-such” parts with your own thoughts and words.

Word Count: 750-900 words

For Due Dates, see our Week-by-Week Class Plan.


Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Handouts

Research and Reading Critically: Using Online Citation Resources

Citations should be easy. My view is that you shouldn’t have to go over them in class, at least in an idea world. But it’s not an ideal world. When I was a college student, we didn’t have the internet. We also walked uphill, both ways, in bare feet to class. I am exaggerating, of course.

We did not, however, a lot of things you have. Many if not all academic databases offer to create and save a citation of your source, for example. So take advantage of that, copying and pasting the citation along with your notes into your document. There are also online resources that help create  citations for your works cited and bibliography pages. Enter in the relevant information, and there you go!

Here are a few. You can search for “online citation creator” and you may find ones that work better for you.

Citation Machine

KnightCite

Citation Builder

WARNING: Just because you may use these online citation-makers does not mean they will be correct format- or fact-wise. Some of these sites have bugs, as convenient as they may seem. Double-check the citations before handing in. Check for absent punctuation and other elements of your citation, and make sure the typeface is the same as your original document; I suggest copying and pasting in as unformatted text (in Word from the Home tab, it’s Paste>Paste Special>Unformatted Text) to make sure there are no bugs from your generated citation.

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Handouts

Research and Reading Critically: Finding Good Sources

What is a good source for a paper?  A bad one?

Generally speaking, there are no bad sources for papers. Sources may be used badly, but everything can be cited in a college-level paper. It’s the way it’s used in the paper.

College papers these days cite TV commercials, billboards, Justin Bieber songs, personal interviews, speakers on campus, and YouTube videos of a Dora the Explorer episodes. That’s fine.  We write about the world around us. To bring our writing up to that of a scholar, of college-level writers who have consulted what others think and have learned themsevles, we also have to find out what others are saying about our world. To do that, we need to move on from surface information and find sources with deeper levels of information and intepretation.

Evaluating sources and sites online

I love the internet. I love how we have much of the world at our fingertips.  (Much of the world, but hardly all of it. We’ll get to that later.)  The majority of websites are not exactly meant for scholarly sources, but some might be. How do we know?

You need to be able to “read” a website and evaluate it. Some tips:

  • Look at the bottom line of the page. Is there a copyright notice? Does it indicate it’s a blog?
  • Does the site’s author work for someone writing this blog, or is an authority on a subject?
  • Is the design of the site professional? Does the address line indicate it’s from a large organization?

Online scholarly databases

When it comes to research, there’s the internet, and then there’s online sources. The internet would be going to an address directly and finding a page.  All online sources are not on the internet–not directly, at least. A good amount of valuable information and content are behind password-protected pages, sometimes they’re called “paywalls,” and you will need to get access to them to read.

Fortunately for us, the Saint Rose Library has a wealth of information–scholarly publications, books, reference works–inside its password-protected access.  Some definitions are in order. To access this information, you have to use what are called an academic databases, which are services that collect and archive past issues.  There a lot of them at our fingertips, and many overlap in their offerings. These databases have their own search engine functions, which are powerful and require attention when using them.

Most of the databases center around a subject or discipline and, depending on your major, you will become accustomed to the foibles and advantages and disadvantages of a core group of ones you will use for your major.  All of the databases are similar to a certain extent.

A good starting point

The library’s website has a very user-friendly design for writing a paper. The Research by Subject page is my favorite, go-to starting point for finding good sources. There, you will see a breakdown of subjects and majors and disciplines; click on any of them, and you will see a small, manageable list of databases that center around that subject.  On the top right of that page, you will see the 360 Search Quick Link, which is really powerful and accesses all of the databases at the same time. I’ve had mixed results, often there are so many extraneous links to articles I would never use, but sometimes I will come up with a real gem.

Further Reading:

The Saint Rose Academic Support Center has a useful handout on research and other subjects.

“Conducting Research.” Purdue Online Writing Lab. 26 January 2011 <http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/2/8/>.

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Handouts

Research and Reading Critically: Using Wikipedia

Image representing Wikipedia as depicted in Cr...

Image via CrunchBase

After you start your paper, even with the most general of topics (often by a hunch), after you cluster your potential topics together on a piece of paper, you research. There are lots of different kinds of research.

Initial Research

Direct,  fact-based research that provide expository information on your topic, the ones that answer the journalist-type questions of who, what, when, where, and why. This is often where web research helps. And yes, Wikipedia.

A word to the wise about using Wikipedia in academic settings: go ahead and use it, but it’s not exactly worth of a works cited page, not for college-level writing. Let me explain. It’s fine to look up your topic in Wikipedia, just the same as you might look up a word related to your topic in a dictionary; however, you’re looking to these sources for general knowledge, often to confirm or clarify facts you already know.

Direct Quotes? Really?

I don’t know how many times I’ve seen in a paper a student citing Wikipedia for something factual, often using direct quotes for the language. Example:

Justin Bieber’s song “One Time” was “released worldwide in 2009″ and “charted in the top 30 in over ten countries” (Wikipedia).

Using “direct quotes” for the most “indistinct language” in a “college paper” not only tends to “distract.”  It also isn’t an “efficient” use of “quotes.”  When you look up something in the “Wikipedia,” you’re not getting “quotable language” as much as you are “getting facts.”  To “quote” the phrase “released worldwide in 2009″ looks strange. It’s also kind of annoying, right?  Why?  Because to use quotes when giving “background information,” information anyone has access to in any number of “reference books,” isn’t really an effective use of quoting. In the context of the example, you’re providing expository information–who, what, when, where, and why

To be blunt, the citing of Wikipedia isn’t so wrong as regarded as lazy among professors and other professionals. Wikipedia, at least in college-level writing, is a starting-off point, and to cite Wikipedia indicates that the student writer began to research, then stopped. Look at it as a page full of entry-level facts and links to other, hopefully more reputable, primary sources. Even pre-Wikipedia, it was regarded as somewhat lazy or amateurish to cite an Encyclopedia, so don’t take it personally.

Let’s try it again.

Justin Bieber’s song “One Time” was released worldwide in 2009 and hit the top 30 in more than ten countries (Wikipedia).

That’s better. Is “worldwide” that distinctive of a word? No. About about the number “30″?

Acuracy Accuracy and Stuff

I am not the kind of professor who talks about how Wikipedia is riddled with errors and is an inaccurate source, and represents the End of Western Civilization as We Know It. Most of the writing in all reference books, Wikipedia included, is not meant to be Shakespeare and is not meant to be quoted. Use it when you start out, use it in your notes.  But as a general rule, don’t put it on your Bibliography or Works Cited page. And don’t ever directly quote it.

Where Do We Go From Here?

In high school, you might have heard the terms primary and secondary sources. Wikipedia is a source that comes from many other sources, called References. Many of those references are reputable primary sources. Some entries have a Further Reading section, which points readers to related, often book-length sources that will add to your information gathering.

 

Further reading:

“Online References.” Purdue Online Writing Lab. 26 January 2011 <http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/738/03/>.

“Paraphrasing and Summarizing Exercise.” Purdue Online Writing Lab. 23 January 2011. <http://owl.english.purdue.edu/engagement/index.php?category_id=3&sub_category_id=8&article_id=102>

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Handouts

Writer Portrait Assignment

The purpose of this first assignment is to get to know each other in class, to start our conversation about writing, and to get each of your to present in front of the class as soon as possible. It’s also a way for me to see how you interpret assignments, gauge your knowledge of technology and mechanics and grammar-type terms. Oh, and to have some fun.

Assignment:

Interview one of your fellow students about their experience in writing. Take notes, not only what your subject says, but how he or she says it. Is he or she laughing while relaying information? Does he or she seem shy or outgoing?  Include your impressions, descriptions, context of your talk, as well as what you know about your partner from the ice-breaker-type answers.

Part 1. Ask your subject to tell you a story related to his or her experience in writing. Does your subject write in his or her spare time? Or one story from a previous class or assignment, or writing in general (status updates on Facebook/Twitter, etc.) that he or she remembers?

Part 2. Ask general questions about your subject’s own writing life and practice. Some possible examples:

Are you a confident writer?  Not so confident? Or does your subject hate writing, and dreads it? How about writing for pleasure? Does your subject keep a notebook? What does he or she need to work on?  Grammar? Spelling?  Reading? Level of interest? How about research? Or presenting in front of class?

In the written assignment, talk about your subject, but also try to answer these questions for yourself. One idea would be to contrast your own writing experience with your subject’s.

Specifications for In-Class Presentation:

  • Must be 2-4 minutes. No more, no less.
  • Summarize part of your conversation or what you plan to write, not all.
  • No notes. I’ll pass out one index card to each of you during class.

Specifications for Written Portrait:  

Word Count: 400-500 words

Presentations: Wednesday, August 29.

Put in folder in our class Dropbox called “01 Writer Portrait” by Friday, August 31, 11:59pm EST.

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Handouts, Writing Prompts

Quotations, Paraphrases, and Summaries Presentation

Download PDF version here.

Video version of this presentation with my lectures after the jump.

Continue reading

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Handouts

Analyzing a Performance


Handout: Analyzing a Performance (PowerPoint file)

Comments Off

Filed under Handouts

Models for Reckoning Paragraphs

A nice excerpt from from: Nora M. Alter’s “Memory Essays,” which mentions Lukacs and Adorno.

Joshua Schriftman’s website has a blogpost on Adorno that’s conversational and rigorous.

A nice passage from Adorno: A Critical Introduction.

The Encyclopedia of the Essay has some nice reckonings.

Review of a book on Adorno that introduces integrates his thoughts and quotes, then offers–gasp!–and opinion.

Ander Monson’s “The Essay as Hack” is a spirited exploration of essay writing and Adorno.

Steven Helmling’s “How to Read Adorno on How to Read Hegel.”

 

more to come!

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Handouts

Figure and excerpt from “Notes on Conceptualisms,” by Vanessa Place and Robert Fitterman.

 

 

Comments Off

Filed under Handouts

Coming to a Reckoning: A Way to Write a Solid, Substantial Academic Paragraph

Here is writing exercise, take-home or in-class, focused or free-write, to help writers practice textual incorporation (and think about the relationship between incorporation and interpretation).

    1. Pick a passage from a reading that speaks to you, haunts you, finds itself stuck in your memory. Pick the passage you wish you had selected but didn’t. Let it be lengthy (4-5 sentences or longer).
    2. Paraphrase it; put it in your own words. In “Name of Article,” X. writes that ___ .
    3. Now, condense your paraphrase into one sentence that starts with the phrase “In other words…, “” One could say that,” “[Name of author]‘s idea is that.”  See what happens.
    4. From here, start a sentence that helps you link the work above with the ideas you’ve been starting to hatch on your own. Try “This helps me see that..” or “This might mean that…”

      You might focus on what you now see your author values, or what her motive is for writing in the first place. You might focus on what interests you or compelled you to select this passage in the first place. You might focus on what your author’s ideas help you see/say about some of the themes you’ve identified as important/intriguing thus far.

    5. Next, adopt a contrarian stance. Disagree with yourself, or rather your interpretation/summary.  Use “However,” “But” or “On the other hand…” or “It might be the case that ___” or “When we say this, we might overlook _____.
    6. Finally, come to a tentative resolution or a question. Start a sentence with “Perhaps…” or “The question is worth raising because,” “On balance,” or “What it all comes down to is.”
    7. See where you end up.

Bonus: Use direct quote inside one of your own sentences. Set up the quote beforehand, and explain on why the term/quote matters or implies.

You’ll see that you now have a substantial paragraph, with a word count of anything from 150-300 words or more. The excerpt from your chosen text does not merely float there; you have been to think about it and reflect on it and interact with it. Think about how you might use this in all the modes of your writing: from academic articles, to experimental forms and creative writing, down to emails to your friends.

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Essay Writing, Handouts, Writing Prompts

Further Thoughts on the “I Notice” Segment of the Writing Workshop

How do we separate interpretation from observation of a work of art?

Do we talk about a work of art without judging it first?

Does being “critical” mean being critical?

If one is disinterested in a work of art, does that mean you’re uninterested?

Since I first started teaching, I have assigned students to “notice” elements and qualities in each other’s work as part of The “Rules” of a Creative Writing Workshop.  It’s a simple, straightforward principle, with the idea of answering these questions above, but one that is hard for many to understand. For those who many be confused over what is a “good notice” or a “bad notice,” this post is for you.

First, what does notice mean? For our purposes, notice means “to become aware of” or “perceive” or “point out.” To notice something as a workshop participant, then, is to bring to merely bring attention to the group something in the work we’re reading.

What “something”s do we notice? The first rule is to confine your notice-comment to the physical make-up of the piece and divorce it from any interpretation of judgment. We’ll get to interpretation and judgment later, but here are just some examples of what could qualify as the physical make-up of a piece of writing:

Verb tense. “I notice this piece starts out in the past and later, on page 5, is in present tense.”

Other parts of speech (adjectives, adverbs, nouns, articles).  ”I notice the narration paragraph on the top of page 3 has 15 adjectives.”

Sentences. “I notice this opens with three simple sentences in a row.”

Paragraphs. “I notice the paragraph that begins on page 6 and ends on page 8.”

Structure. Plot. Narration.

Use of Dialogue.

Metaphor. Use of figurative language.

How do you describe these without issuing an opinion seems to be the most difficult part of this noticing.

Count how many times a word is used.

“I notice the word “mother” used seven times on page 3.”

1 Comment

Filed under Handouts

Phaedrus dialogue on rhetoric and writing (274b-277a).

Socrates
We have, then, said enough about the art of speaking and that which is no art.

Phaedrus

Assuredly.

Socrates

But we have still to speak of propriety and impropriety in writing, how it should be done and how it is improper, have we not?

Phaedrus

Yes.

Socrates

Do you know how you can act or speak about rhetoric so as to please God best?

Phaedrus

Not at all; do you?

Socrates

I can tell something I have heard of the ancients; but whether it is true, they only know. But if we ourselves should find it out, should we care any longer for human opinions?

Phaedrus

A ridiculous question! But tell me what you say you have heard.

Socrates

I heard, then, that at Naucratis, in Egypt, was one of the ancient gods of that country, the one whose sacred bird is called the ibis, and the name of the god himself was Theuth. He it was who invented numbers and arithmetic and geometry and astronomy, also draughts and dice, and, most important of all, letters. Now the king of all Egypt at that time was the god Thamus, who lived in the great city of the upper region, which the Greeks call the Egyptian Thebes, and they call the god himself Ammon. To him came Theuth to show his inventions, saying that they ought to be imparted to the other Egyptians. But Thamus asked what use there was in each, and as Theuth enumerated their uses, expressed praise or blame, according as he approved or disapproved. The story goes that Thamus said many things to Theuth in praise or blame of the various arts, which it would take too long to repeat; but when they came to the letters, “This invention, O king,” said Theuth, “will make the Egyptians wiser and will improve their memories; for it is an elixir of memory and wisdom that I have discovered.” But Thamus replied, “Most ingenious Theuth, one man has the ability to beget arts, but the ability to judge of their usefulness or harmfulness to their users belongs to another; and now you, who are the father of letters, have been led by your affection to ascribe to them a power the opposite of that which they really possess. For this invention will produce forgetfulness in the minds of those who learn to use it, because they will not practice their memory. Their trust in writing, produced by external characters which are no part of themselves, will discourage the use of their own memory within them. You have invented an elixir not of memory, but of reminding; and you offer your pupils the appearance of wisdom, not true wisdom, for they will read many things without instruction and will therefore seem to know many things, when they are for the most part ignorant and hard to get along with, since they are not wise, but only appear wise.

Phaedrus

A noble pastime, Socrates, and a contrast to those base pleasures, the pastime of the man who can find amusement in discourse, telling stories about justice, and the other subjects of which you speak.

Socrates
Yes, Phaedrus, so it is; but, in my opinion, serious discourse about them is far nobler, when one employs the dialectic method and plants and sows in a fitting soul intelligent words which are able to help themselves and him who planted them, which are not fruitless, but yield seed from which there spring up in other minds other words capable of continuing the process for ever, and which make their possessor happy, to the farthest possible limit of human happiness.

Phaedrus

Yes, that is far nobler.

Socrates

And now, Phaedrus, since we have agreed about these matters, we can decide the others.

Phaedrus

What others?

Source: Perseus Digital Library.

1 Comment

Filed under Handouts

“Form is nothing more than an extension of content.” In other words,

Comments Off

Filed under Handouts

The Personal Definition Essay Assignment

Diagram from the essay "Printing" in...

Image via Wikipedia

The assignment is to write an essay (4-5 pages) that introduces, develops, explores, and ultimately, informs and outlines an argument for your personal definition of a term.

Elements of this Essay
The goal of an essay that defines a term, according to The Sundance Reader, is to “inform or persuade” an audience. Your audience for this essay is this class, both classmates and instructor, as well as the general reader (i.e., the world).  To fulfill this assignment, you must use support and illustrate your point with specific details.  Use readings, research, personal evidence, and statistics to inform or persuade readers to accept or understand your point of view.

To excel at this assignment, your essay’s definition should come from a distinct, single idea, a personal definition, that is yours.

The key word in personal definition is personal–you’re not, for example, attempting to define a word like “infidelity” on behalf of a whole country, a religion, or according to a law.  It’s your personal definition.

How do you define something?  That’s a good question.

If you start with just your own imitation at a dictionary definition, or try to mimic something such as legislation or criminal law, chances are you’re going to run into some trouble.  These elements turn up in personal definition essays, but more often than not these are used in service to the writer’s personal definition–either as a supporting point, color detail, or as a rhetorical foil. It may seem like you are saving time, but it will just pigeon-hole your thinking and writing.

A better place to start, and a good way to test if your topic or word would work for this kind of essay, is to write about the denotative and connotative definitions of your word. Denotative is the dictionary definition, the literal sense of a word; connotation is its figurative meaning or images or associations it might have outside its literary meaning, depending on its context and how it’s being expressed.  Words like home, date, crazy, message, disrespect, child, tree, all have denotative meanings, but also connote other meanings as well. Many words also take on a kind of mythical importance among certain groups, an idea advanced in the field of semiotics.

The narrative strategy.
As an exercise, you could try tell us a story, a specific story, that uses your word/term.  Then try to define it.   Tell another story, maybe someone else’s.  Then define it again and change it a little bit.  And so on, and so on.  Try to tell 3-4 stories that use the word and define the word at the end.  Sounds like a fairy tale with a moral, I know.  But it works.  All we have is our stories.

Compare/contrast. Find a word that is similar and explore the differences and distrintions between the two—not just denotatively, but connotatively. Look at other people’s definitions and contrast them with your own: How do experts in the field define your term? That’s a good start.  In your homework, you asked other people their experience with a term.

Defining the opposite. Another strategy might be called negation; in other words, what is your term not?

A definition essay shares your special understanding about some idea or thing. Sometimes a definition will prove to be a small but important part of an essay; sometimes a definition will be the sole work of an entire essay. When it’s the major impetus of an essay, there are several points to remember.

In selecting a topic to define, look for something that you can define within your own experience and that will allow your poetic imagination some room to play. It might be a big mistake for your English instructor to define reggae or rap music, but there are many students who could do a great job. If you try to define something that is beyond the comprehension of your paper or your own experience, the task will become overwhelming and get mired down in details or abstractions. You could write a book trying to define a concept such as conservatism or liberalism and you still wouldn’t have said anything that more than two other people would agree with. Students would be wise to avoid abstract notions such as patriotism, beauty, justice, love, or being a good sport.

Links to read before starting this assignment:

Developing a Definition

Definition Essay

Writing Definitions, from Purdue’s Online Writing Lab (OWL)

Research. No matter which strategies you adopt, you will have to support some of your claims with research. This can draw from scholarly or general readership publications, images from popular culture, or original interviews with other people. Cite these in your essay.

Deadlines
Rough Draft:
Workshops:
Final Draft:

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Essay Writing, Handouts, Writing Prompts

Memoir Scene: Some Important Questions

“I am talking about a time when I began to doubt the premises of all the stories I told myself, a common condition but one I found troubling” (Joan Didion, “The White Album”)

“This is about death.”
“This is about death and it is about blame.” (Meghan Daum, “Variations on Grief”)

For a memoir workshop, we should prepared to discuss many if not all of the following questions, both about one’s own draft and fellow students’ work.

  • What is this scene really about?
  • What lesson might this scene teach us?
  • What problem does the author seem to be wrestling with, or trying to solve?
  • What is at stake in this scene?
  • What are the consequences of the action(s) described?
  • What do you want to learn from the writer of this scene?
  • What questions remain unanswered?
  • What do you think the writer is teaching us?
  • How would you suggest the writer might speculate on what how this scene might help you and your readers understand what you are pondering in the essay as a whole?
  • Should the writer use figurative or literal language?  In other words, should the writer use images, comparison or metaphor, or try to tell us exactly what is happening?  Why?
  • Where in this draft could the writer introduce a narrator, one that uses retrospective voice us understand what is going on in this scene?  Or is there one already?
  • Should there be a summary section?
  • Should there be dialogue? How much should be paraphrased?
  • Should some kind of backstory be introduced? For example, a flashback scene embedded inside this scene or a rundown explanation or short history of the people involved in the scene.  Would this help enrich our understanding of the scene?
  • Try to fill in the blanks of these prompts for your piece, or suggest for anyone else’s:

There must have been a time….

I have always wondered why/about….

People have always asked questions about ….My answer is ….

Comments Off

Filed under Handouts

The Essay Paradox: An Attempt at a Two-Column, Binary Breakdown

This is some work on the dry-erase board I did one very caffeinated day in class in 2008. Since then, I have tried to break down the ideas of form, genre, knowledge, and the essay further. Here below is a more formal attempt.

Essay Epistemology
Empirical but used in a much more limited way Empirical cumulative and progressive
Subjective Objective
Anti-Academic Academic
presupposes an independent observer, a specific object, sympathetic reader “cooperative, public, and cumulative” (Bacon)
spontaneous, unsystematic, occasional, even accidental certain knowledge, a method for finding it, as Descartes
exists outside any organization of new knowledge tries to organize a new discipline on basis of its discovery
open mind confronts and open reality
makes claim to truth, but not permanent truth beginning with Descartes, wants to make a new start for knowledge
opposes doctrines and disciplines[1] learning, discipline, teaching
“I speak as one who questions and does not know…I do not teach, I relate” (Montaigne) eventually evolves into a writing for the specialist audience
for the autodidact; no certification required general reader is discouraged by the specialized tone and style
diversity of opinions any addition to field is limited to those with proper training, certification
particularity, emblematic examples, often personal unity of opinions; general rules from specific instances
makes no claim to be definitive; the truth here is a limited truth knowledge is superseded by successive additions
ideas are for the here-and-now, while the sense impressions
“belletristic ancestry,” i.e., literature “philosophical legitimacy,” i.e., science
pastoral mood, detached–>freedom knowledge
ultimately personal, “intellectual poems,” mimetic as well as creative ultimately impersonal
connotative, humanistic, nurture denotative, nature
tangential, leaping, “Dragon Smoke,”[2] “grotesques” (Montaigne)
provisional reflection of an ephemeral experience of an event or object professionalized literature study
disinterestedness ““the object as in itself it really is” (Arnold)
leisure, Flaneur (Baudelaire) necessity, utility, Pragmatism
what do I know? what do we know?
mixture of anecdote, description, opinion evidence, support, reporting
content is “usually” art strict knowledge that ‘subordinates idea’ (Adorno)
“an organ of sublime power”/“parharmonicon” (Ralph Waldo Emerson)[3]

[1] “Hence,” Good says, “the essay’s neglect in the higher levels of the academic system.”

[2] See Robert Bly’s idea of “leaping” in poetry and literature.

[3] Emerson quote in full:

And here is a PDF version of this whole post, suitable for printing out and lighting on fire.

Related posts:

What is an Essay?

Phaedrus dialogue.


1 Comment

Filed under Handouts

Section Breaks in a Collage-Montage-Mosaic-Braided-Segmented Essay: Some Thoughts

A capital distinction to make is that between the story itself (which is, to say quite simply, “what happens” when one lays out one scenario in chronological order) and another level which we can call narration, but which others call: telling, discourse, dramatic construction, etc., and concerns the way in which the story is told. In particular, the information of the story are brought into the awareness of the audience (ways of telling, information hidden, then revealed, utilization of time, of ellipsis, of emphasis, etc.), this art of narration can, by itself, lend interest to a predictable story.  Inversely, poor narration destroys the interest of a good story, as anyone who has every tried to tell a joke which falls flat can attest. —Michel Chion, Ecrire en scenario

***

Every form of art involves editing, in the sense of selection and collation, adjusting parts and pieces. … I see my professional task, then, to create my own, distinctive flow of time, and convey in a shot the sense of movement—from lazy and soporific to stormy and swift—and to one person it will seem one way, to another, another.

Assembly, editing, disturbs the passage of time, interrupts it and simultaneously gives it something new.  The distortion of time can be a means of rhythmical expression.

Sculpting in time!

—Andrey Tarkovsky, Sculpting in Time

Uses of section breaks:

  • indicate the passing of time
  • indicate a change of setting
  • indicate a change in point of view
  • indicate transitions where none are otherwise indicated
  • can offer readers a rest inside a long chapter or piece
  • sometimes can give us a pause as darker or more intense images are offered by a writer; other times, that can drive home that there is no getting away from these images; that, even though you may gain some respite from a section break, we will return to the intensity that is just as unrelenting

Overuse of section breaks:

  • May give piece a choppy feel when a choppy feel is not the intended effect.
  • Gives your readers a chance to stop reading.
  • Abrupt ends to scenes.
  • When section breaks are not truly needed or when a chapter break (in our case a page break) would serve a better use.

Some of these ideas are adapted from Noah Lukeman’s A Dash of Style: The Art and Master of Punctuation in his chapter “Paragraph and Section Breaks: The Stoplight and the Town Line.” New York: W.W. Norton, 2007.

Comments Off

Filed under Handouts

Four Essay Outlines

Outline 1: The Persuasive Essay with Narrative Brackets

Narrative lede/story, outside of the world of your essay, that is emblematic of, a metaphor for, or tries to illustrate, your Main Idea.

Transition into Main Idea (proposition/thesis)àthesis, outline of support/exploration/Subtopics 1/2/3

Subtopic 1: Most obvious point, or easiest to make, but not the strongest illustration.

Subtopic 2: Your weakest or most speculative point would go here.

Opposite/Contrasting viewpoint/point of view: Would it be so bad if what you are exploring or supporting wasn’t the case?

Subtopic 3: Your best evidence/support, the most compelling story.

Back to Narrative lede/story, re-addressing with Main Idea in mind.  Why would others think what you are talking about might be important?

Outline 2: The Cold Open

The Cold Open: Statement of fact; A description of a situation as it stands now, and what it threatens to be unless something—mindset, policy, reading of art—changes.  This could be a narrative, and it could be personal, but usually only if the writer is a main player in the situation (policy maker, politician, correspondent).

Transition into Main Idea (proposition/thesis)àthis is you solution/alternate method/another way of looking at the world (art/politics/religion/morals/technology).  Why might/should/would others think what you are addressing is important? Outline your support/exploration/Subtopics 1/2/3

Restate the problem, the “consequences” if things stay the way they are.

Subtopic 1: Restate your most obvious point, or easiest to make, but not the strongest illustration

Subtopic 2: Perhaps your weakest would go here

Opposite/Contrasting viewpoint/point of view: Would it be so bad if what you are exploring or supporting wasn’t the case?

Subtopic 3: Your best evidence/support, the most compelling story.

Back to your Cold Open.  How can we look at things differently or change the status quo?  What’s the first step toward changing our mindset?  Narrative lede/story, re-addressing with Main Idea in mind.

Outline 3: The Socratic Soft Sell

Tell us your topic or problem: I would like to talk about __________ . Why is it a timely subject?  Talk about a recent news story or recent phenomenon many of us have experienced, and perhaps you experienced first-hand.

The Maybe Paragraph.  Ask a series of questions to your reader; this narrows down what you are talking about and tries to introduce the heart of the matter.  What are we really talking about?  Why might this be important?  Do we need to change our way of thinking?  See our world differently?  Slowly transition into Main Idea by saying “Perhaps what we are really talking about is __________. Outline your explanation/exploration in Subtopics 1/2/3

Subtopic 1: Restate again why this General Topic and your Reshifting of the Discussion is timely.  Tell us what might be at stake or how some readers might benefit.

Subtopic 2: Using examples and evidence, try to answer your questions in the Maybe Paragraph—not definitely, but with the idea of one solution or answer may be found in _______.

Subtopic 3: Sell your idea here a little bit harder.  What if We Don’t Ask these Questions: What will happen?  What are the consequences of leaving this topic unexamined?

Subtopic 3: Your best evidence/support, the most compelling story.

Back to your Cold Open.  How can we look at things differently or change the status quo?  What’s the first step toward changing our mindset?  Narrative lede/story, re-addressing with Main Idea in mind.

Outline 4: The Story of Your Idea

In a narrative lede/story, tell us how your idea or position has changed—tell readers your Before-and-After story: what you thought about a particular topic/idea/problem before you went about your process of writing this essay and investigating, and what you think now, and why.  The change of position does not need to be a complete 180-degree turn; mostly, these essays describe the degree, however small, your outlook has changed.

Subtopic 1: The Before Picture.  Tell us why you had this Before position, place in context personally, critically, or both.

Subtopic 2: The Epiphany.  What happened to make you change your mind?  Try to pinpoint a particular experience, text, idea, realization that made you change your idea.  Tell us the story of this change.

The Soft Sell/Opposing Argument.  Tell us why it might fruitful for others to go down the same road of critical inquiry and investigation that you have gone down.

Subtopic 3: The After Picture.  Tell us why others might want to consider shifting to the ger.

Back to before you changed your position.  How has your outlook changed from that moment?

Back to your Narrative Lede/Story.  Tell us some added detail, some parting detail of your critical inquiry with this topic/problem/issue.  Why does this matter?  Why might we care?

Comments Off

Filed under Essay Writing, Handouts, Writing Prompts

First-Person Writing on Film: Cindy Sherman, Speed Levitch, Spalding Gray, etc.

Comments Off

Filed under Handouts

Three Ideas about Nonfiction from Chris Anderson’s Style as Argument

1. “rhetoric of particularity.” The concreteness of some scenes, he says, “carries the burden of meaning.”  Rather than telling us exactly what is happening or interpreting a situation as such—as, say, a research paper or journalism story might do—writers such as Joan Didion or Albert Goldbarth “dramatize” the writer “in a particular place and time,” as she does in “The White Album,” and Koestenbaum does in “Thrifting” and “Notes on Not Now.”

2. “rhetoric of gaps.” Withholding commentary and interpretation at every level of language.  Deliberate omission of transitional words, phrases, paragraphs.  Doing this, the reader is required to make meaning for him/herself.  By letting facts resonate without commentary, they leave us pondering them without having our hand held with a particular meaning.

3.  “rhetoric of process.” Highly tentative, grounded in the process in that moment.  Make a statement, then amend that statement with a modification or clarification or retraction.  Instead of merely erasing the initial writing and leaving us with perhaps the more definitive observation, Didion, and to perhaps a lesser extent Koestenbaum, lets both stand.  This gives us the mimetic/diegetic impressions of thinking happening as the writing is happening.

“The parentheticals, repeated predicates, multiple conjunctions, and cumulative modifications,” Anderson writes, “reflect this spontaneity.”

–Chris Anderson’s Style as Argument

Comments Off

Filed under Handouts

Working with Dialogue and Narration

Handout_SaidIsDead

Ug. Please. Said is not dead. It is alive.

First things first: We always work with raw material. Except when working with our own interior thoughts, musings, commentary, and interior dialogue, we always work with outside sources.  And sometimes we will use other people’s words and quotes from sources—web pages, results from research, old emails. A writer can’t possibly use direct quotes for everything—the piece dictates what is directly quoted, paraphrased, paraquoted, alluded to, or cut altogether.  So when working with raw materials, the writer has a series of options at her disposal.  The writer needs to make choices what and how to work with.


Example of raw material: The remembered transcript.
Here are notes of what I recall was said, to the best of my memory.  It was a conversation from my teaching days in New York City in 1998.  The student’s name has been changed.

Daniel Nester: Good morning.

Helga: What’s going on, Professor Nester?

Daniel: Nothing much, Helga.  What’s up?

Helga: Well, umm, uh, I can’t make it to class today.  I’ve decided to take a job as a drummer in the European touring company of Rent.

How do we work with this raw transcript, raw notes, articles and other texts?  I suppose quoting huge portions from sources and notes word-for-word is an option.  But verbatim passages need to be essential to the piece to quote directly.

A word about conventions. Sometimes, in some pieces, you might read a piece where there is a transcript format.  This is not the usual convention, since usually the transcript alone does not an essay or story make.  If one does see a transcript, it is usually it is self-consciously a “transcript,” either to add to the realism of a piece (c.f., Joan Didion’s “The White Album” has a couple transcripts to place us in the room where official statements are made), or to add to the humor.

Worked into a larger piece, this raw transcript can take any number of forms.  Working from raw material like above, here’s a couple scenarios.

SCENARIO #1

Convert to dialogue with attributive phrases/speech tags (i.e., he said/says, she said/says).  Notice the way the punctuation at the end of the quote is inside the quotations.  This is the American convention; you might see the comma outside quotations in those texts produced in England and Commonwealth countries.

“Good morning,” I said.

“What’s going on, Professor Nester?” Helga said.

“Nothing much, Helga.  What’s up?” I said.

“Well, I can’t make it to class today.  I’ve decided to take a job as a drummer in the European touring company of Rent,” I said.

This is working with quoted sources at its most basic level.  We need to know who said what and, when applicable, to whom.  Putting words in double quotation marks means what is said is a direct quote; that is, these are the exact words someone said or wrote.

Notice also I took out the “umm, uh” from Helga’s last quote.  This is commonly referred to as “cleaning up” the quote.  I made this editorial choice because, to me, it doesn’t add to the distinctiveness of the dialogue if we kept it in.  Another writer might make another choice.

Let’s agree there’s some things in the above passage that are boring or at least not that important to quote directly. To tell readers I said “Nothing much, Helga. What’s up?” isn’t that interesting, at least in this instance.  Other quotations, meanwhile, might be best served as a direct quote. When Helga tells me she’s accepted a job with a musical, I think it would be a strong candidate for direct quotation.

Let’s also agree that SAID IS NOT DEAD. As writer Jim Ruland tells John Warner, “A tag on a line of dialog is like a tag on a garment: you’re not supposed to notice it and it’s slightly embarrassing when you do.” The point is “just” using said, Warner writes, is to allow the audience to focus on the character’s words, rather than drawing attention to a “he exclaimed!” or “she enthused!” lingering there at the end.”

SCENARIO #2

Look at Scenario #1 and we’ll see at least one problem: I have both myself and Helga addressing the other person in the quotes as well as attributive phrases.  So to have an attributive phrase after each line of dialogue is redundant and clunky.

One way to fix this is to use direct quotes and take out or don’t use attributive phrases, with a reader-friendly paragraph break for each line of dialogue.

The result:

“Good morning.”

“What’s going on, Professor Nester?”

“Nothing much, Helga. What’s up?”

“Well, I can’t make it to class today.  I’ve decided to take a job as a drummer in the European touring company of Rent.”

At least in this instance, it works.  It’s obvious who’s saying what to whom.

From Maxine Hong Kingston’s The Woman Warrior. New York: Vintage, 1987.

Here, the attributive phrase appears in the opening exchange, then goes away.  Readers know who’s saying what to whom, and the dialogue is so distrinctive I suspect the author wanted the readers’ focus to be on that.


SCENARIO #3

In addition to taking out or not using attributive phrases, I could also take the names out of the transcript. Writers and editors might refer to this as “editing down” or “cleaning up” the quote.

“What’s going on, Professor Nester?”

“Nothing much, Helga.  What’s up?”

The result:

“Good morning.”

“What’s going on?”

“Nothing much. What’s up?”

“Well, I can’t make it to class today.  I’ve decided to take a job as a drummer in the European touring company of Rent.”

Minimal, dramatic, and easy to follow, thanks in large part to the paragraph breaks and the exchange’s brevity.  I still think we can work with this, though.

SCENARIO #4

We could take the names out and add attributive phrases in the middle of the dialogue.  This is commonly called “breaking up the quote.”

“Good morning,” I said.

“What’s going on?” Helga said.

“Nothing much,” I said. “What’s up?”

Well, I can’t make it to class today,” Helga said. “I’ve decided to take a job as a drummer in the European touring company of Rent.”

I stopped the quote and told the reader the basic information: who said what.  It works a little better, pacing- and sense-wise.

Notice that I also took out the “Well” from the last line.  Including it might work in another instance, but I made this choice here because it’s not that interesting.  It’s completely within my ethical and editorial rights as a writer to do this.  It’s done all the time, as a matter of fact, and the world is better for it.

But let’s agree the first couple of exchanges—the “Good morning” bits—aren’t that interesting or distinctive and worthy of quoting directly.  So let’s see what we can do about that.

From Maxine Hong Kingston’s The Woman Warrior. New York: Vintage, 1987.

Here, the author needs to describe an action as it a conversation is happening.  We need to know someone left the place of action, and how he left.

SCENARIO #5

Let’s agree that those initial greetings aren’t adding much to the story or the distinctiveness of the exchange.  Let’s also agree that we want to get to that line where my student tells me she’s off to Europe to play drums in Rent.  That is the interesting part, right?

What do we do?  We paraphrase—i.e., we put at least part of the exchange into our own words

“Good morning,” I said.

“What’s going on?” Helga said.

“Nothing much,” I said. “What’s up?”

My student Helga greets me one morning.

“I can’t make it to class today,” she says. “I’ve decided to take a job as a drummer in the European touring company of Rent.”

Here, I’ve cut out the initial exchanges, paraphrased it, and got to the one remark I determined worthy of or useful for direct quotation.  I’ve still broken up the quote with a basic attributable phrase.  Notice I am using the present tense in the attributive phrase—i.e., I switched from “she said” to “she says.”  I didn’t need to use this, but I felt the need to use active voice because the paraphrase narration sentence above the quote uses the present tense.  A bit of obsessive editing, perhaps, but it’s an option for the writer to do this.


SCENARIO #6

Let’s offer some narration, and edit down and break up and paraphrase the one quote we do use.

My student Helga runs up me on Sixth Avenue one rainy morning as I walk inside the Parsons building.

She can’t make it to class today, she says under her umbrella, a little out of breath. “I’ve decided to take a job as a drummer in the European touring company of Rent.”

Since I replaced the salutations and hello-how-are-you-doing business, I’ve opened up a little room for my own narration and commentary.  I also get to add that this exchange takes place somewhere—Sixth Avenue in front of the Parsons building. I get to add some detail about what is going on around us. That’s a little better, pacing- and sense-wise.

We could also agree that the first part of Helga’s quote isn’t especially crucial or interesting to the scene.  So off into paraphrase it goes.

What else might we be able to do with this?

From Maxine Hong Kingston’s The Woman Warrior. New York: Vintage, 1987.

We are using paraphrase here, and it keeps the story going.  Not all primary source material—in this case a letter from Miss Orchid’s neice—needs to be quoted in full, or even quoted at all.  Instead, what’s important to the story—and remember, we are always serving the story—is that this letter arrived, and what it said.

From Augusten Burroughs’ Running with Scissors. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2002.

Narration with omniscient narrator description.

SCENARIO #7

Let’s put use even more narration, more commentary and edit the quote down to its essence.

One rainy Monday morning when I felt my life was thoroughly uninteresting and my writing career was going nowhere, my student Helga runs up me on Sixth Avenue. I was about to teach my third class that day as an underpaid adjunct instructor, something I did to convince myself that getting a master of fine arts degree in creative writing was useful for something.

From under her glamorously huge umbrella, Helga tells me she can’t make it to class today, because she had decided to take a job “as a drummer in the European touring company of Rent.”

The only part of the original transcript, the only part in direct quotation, is in the last half of the last sentence.  In this scenario, I decided that it’s more important to tell you why I am telling you this story; that what was actually said verbatim aren’t important enough to quote; that telling readers about my state of mind was really the point of telling this story.

The quote here adds to the veracity and verisimilitude of the scene.  It adds color.  I don’t even need it.  I could even replace it with paraphrase.  I could replace “Helga,” a name I changed anyway for my own reasons, and just write “a student of mine” all the way through.  What’s important in this scenario, we could say, is the story, not the dialogue.

SCENARIO #8

How about all narration and no quoted dialogue at all, just a summary or paraphrase of what was said?

One rainy Monday morning when I felt my life was thoroughly uninteresting and my writing career was going nowhere, my student Helga runs up me on Sixth Avenue. I was about to teach my third class that day as an underpaid adjunct instructor, something I did to convince myself that getting a master of fine arts degree in creative writing was useful for something.

From under her glamorously huge umbrella, Helga tells she can’t make it to class today, because she had decided to take a drumming orchestra job in a European production of the musical Rent.

What could I say to her, other than I wanted to go to Europe, too?

None of the original transcript appears.  In this scenario, I decided that it’s more important to tell you why I am telling you this story; that what was actually said verbatim aren’t important or distinctive enough to quote; that telling readers about my state of mind was really the point of telling this story.

Please make no mistake: Recalling the transcript helped.  It got me started; it placed me in that situation.  If I didn’t draft up the transcript as notes, at least in this example, I might not have been able to remember that this story stuck in my mind because I was feeling glum about those years after I got out of graduate school.

So: I started off with my raw materials, the transcript, and in the process of writing, re-writing and editing come up with something else entirely.

From Maxine Hong Kingston’s The Woman Warrior. New York: Vintage, 1987.

From Augusten Burroughs’ Running with Scissors. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2002.


First Chapter

I wake to the drone of an airplane engine and the feeling of something warm dripping down my chin. I lift my hand to feel my face. My front four teeth are gone, I have a hole in my cheek, my nose is broken and my eyes are swollen nearly shut. I open them and I look around and I’m in the back of a plane and there’s no one near me. I look at my clothes and my clothes are covered with a colorful mixture of spit, snot, urine, vomit and blood. I reach for the call button and I find it and I push it and I wait and thirty seconds later an Attendant arrives.
How can I help you?
Where am I going?
You don’t know?
No.
You’re going to Chicago, Sir.
How did I get here?
A Doctor and two men brought you on.
They say anything?
They talked to the Captain, Sir. We were told to let you
sleep.
How long till we land?
About twenty minutes.
Thank you.
Although I never look up, I know she smiles and feels sorry for me. She shouldn’t.
A short while later we touch down. I look around for anything I might have with me, but there’s nothing. No ticket, no bags, no clothes, no wallet. I sit and I wait and I try to figure out what happened. Nothing comes.
Once the rest of the Passengers are gone I stand and start to make my way to the door. After about five steps I sit back down. Walking is out of the question. I see my Attendant friend and I raise a hand.
Are you okay?
No.
What’s wrong?
I can’t really walk.
If you make it to the door I can get you a chair.
How far is the door?
Not far.
I stand. I wobble. I sit back down. I stare at the floor and take a deep breath.
You’ll be all right.
I look up and she’s smiling.
Here.
She holds out her hand and I take it. I stand and I lean
against her and she helps me down the Aisle. We get to the
door.
I’ll be right back.
I let go of her hand and I sit down on the steel bridge of the Jetway that connects the Plane to the Gate.
I’m not going anywhere.
She laughs and I watch her walk away and I close my eyes. My head hurts, my mouth hurts, my eyes hurt, my hands hurt. Things without names hurt.
I rub my stomach. I can feel it coming. Fast and strong and burning. No way to stop it, just close your eyes and let it ride. It comes and I recoil from the stench and the pain. There’s nothing I can do.
Oh my God.
I open my eyes.
I’m all right.
Let me find a Doctor.
I’ll be fine. Just get me out of here.
Can you stand?
Yeah, I can stand.
I stand and I brush myself off and I wipe my hands on the floor and I sit down in the wheelchair she has brought me. She goes around to the back of the chair and she starts pushing.
Is someone here for you?
I hope so.
You don’t know.
No.
What if no one’s there?
It’s happened before, I’ll find my way.
We come off the Jetway and into the Gate. Before I have a chance to look around, my Mother and Father are standing in front of me.
Oh Jesus.
Please, Mom.
Oh my God, what happened?
I don’t want to talk about it, Mom.
Jesus Christ, Jimmy. What in Hell happened?
She leans over and she tries to hug me. I push her away.
Let’s just get out of here, Mom.
My Dad goes around to the back of the chair. I look for the Attendant but she has disappeared. Bless her.
You okay, James?
I stare straight ahead.
No, Dad, I’m not okay.
He starts pushing the chair.
Do you have any bags?
My Mother continues crying.
No.
People are staring.
Do you need anything?
I need to get out of here, Dad. Just get me the fuck out of here.
They wheel me to their car. I climb in the backseat and I take off my shirt and I lie down. My Dad starts driving, my Mom keeps crying, I fall asleep.
About four hours later I wake up. My head is clear but everything throbs. I sit forward and I look out the window. We’ve pulled into a Filling Station somewhere in Wisconsin. There is no snow on the ground, but I can feel the cold. My Dad opens the Driver’s door and he sits down and he closes the door. I shiver.
You’re awake.
Yeah.
How are you feeling?
Shitty.
Your Mom’s inside cleaning up and getting supplies. You need anything?
A bottle of water and a couple bottles of wine and a pack of cigarettes.
Seriously?
Yeah.
This is bad, James.
I need it.
You can’t wait.
No.
This will upset your Mother.
I don’t care. I need it.
He opens the door and he goes into the Filling Station. I lie back down and I stare at the ceiling. I can feel my heart quickening and I hold out my hand and I try to keep it straight. I hope they hurry.
Twenty minutes later the bottles are gone. I sit up and I light a smoke and I take a slug of water. Mom turns around.
Better?
If you want to put it that way.
We’re going up to the Cabin.
I figured.
We’re going to decide what to do when we get there.
All right.
What do you think?
I don’t want to think right now.
You’re gonna have to soon.
Then I’ll wait till soon comes.
We head north to the Cabin. Along the way I learn that my Parents, who live in Tokyo, have been in the States for the last two weeks on business. At four a.m. they received a call from a friend of mine who was with me at a Hospital and had tracked them down in a hotel in Michigan. He told them that I had fallen face first down a Fire Escape and that he thought they should find me some help. He didn’t know what I was on, but he knew there was a lot of it and he knew it was bad. They had driven to Chicago during the night.
So what was it?
What was what?
What were you taking?
I’m not sure.
How can you not be sure?
I don’t remember.
What do you remember?
Bits and pieces.
Like what?
I don’t remember.
We drive on and after a few hard silent minutes, we arrive. We get out of the car and we go into the House and I take a shower because I need it. When I get out there are some fresh clothes sitting on my bed. I put them on and I go to my Parents’ room. They are up drinking coffee and talking but when I come in they stop.
Hi.
Mom starts crying again and she looks away. Dad looks at me.
Feeling better?
No.
You should get some sleep.
I’m gonna.
Good.
I look at my Mom. She can’t look back. I breathe.
I just.
I look away.
I just, you know.
I look away. I can’t look at them.
I just wanted to say thanks. For picking me up.
Dad smiles. He takes my Mother by the hand and they stand and they come over to me and they give me a hug. I don’t like it when they touch me so I pull away.
Good night.
Good night, James. We love you.
I turn and I leave their Room and I close their door and I go to the Kitchen. I look through the cabinets and I find an unopened half-gallon bottle of whiskey. The first sip brings my stomach back up, but after that it’s all right. I go to my Room and I drink and I smoke some cigarettes and I think about her. I drink and I smoke and I think about her and at a certain point blackness comes and my memory fails me.

From James Frey’s A Million Little Pieces. New York, Random House, 2005.

Comments Off

Filed under Handouts

Writing a Flashback Scene

Like many of our exercises, this could work as a self-contained piece of writing as well as a building block for a longer piece.

I adapt many terms from Judith Barrington’s “Scene, Summary, and Musing” from Writing the Memoir: From Truth to Art (Portland, OR: The Eighth Mountain Press, 1997.)

1.  Pick a Time Period (from 12 months to 5 years) in which your life was at a crossroads, were about to experience a great change of place or mindset, or were otherwise experiencing some sort of transformation. For some of you, it may be a longer period, in which the outside world as well as her personal life was in a major upheaval.  For a college student, it may be senior year of high school; for others, it might be the death of a loved one or when they came out of the closet as a gay or lesbian.

2. Write about a particular discussion from this period—a conversation or exchange. Make this one finite, moment–on a specific afternoon or morning or overnight stay or road trip.  If your first go-around, you will merely provide a transcription of the exchange as best you can remember. Use direct quotes. Use the present tense and first person, write a straightforward account of the event. Do not comment on its significance or tell us what has happened before or what will happen afterwards.  This will be the heart of your scene.

3. Read through this narration and tell us, in one sentence at the beginning of your scene, what this story, as Barrington writes, is “really about.” You are taking care of some expository information here—the who, what, when, where, how, and why of this scene—but you are also telling us why you are telling this story.  This can be sentence as simple as “This story I am about to tell you is really about ___________.” Or: “When I was ten I learned something about loyalty.” “When I was a senior in high school I learned what death really meant.”  Your “really about” sentence can also be an elliptical or complex; perhaps one that makes a global statement, one that applies to your readers as well.

4. Introduce another, retrospective voice, one that reflects on the exchange of dialogue. In Huxley’s terms, this might be the “abstract-universal” thread of your essay, re-entering into the narration; Barrington calls this retrospective voice “musings,” where the writer tries to formulate some kind of wisdom out of a scene from life.  In this writing—perhaps a paragraph at first, one that might be whittled down to a sentence or two—you are speculating on what how this scene might help you and your readers understand what you are pondering in the essay as a whole.

5.  Strip down your dialogue to its most unparaphraseable elements. Paraphrase all the rest.

6. You can insert your retrospective voice into your narration as you move along in a scene. This might help us understand what is going on.

7.  Describe your surroundings, what the people are doing, especially if it helps us understand the people, the dialogue, or the actions. A couple having an argument while taking a shower, for example, will a lot different than a couple who fights in a pick-up truck.

8. Describe what the actors in this scene are doing. Are they sitting on the couch? In the shower?  In bed?  In a car? Are they on the phone?  Chatting online?

Comments Off

Filed under Handouts, Writing Prompts

Vocal Warm-Ups

Comments Off

Filed under Handouts, Poetry in Performance

Thoreau’s Pencils

Comments Off

Filed under Handouts