Category Archives: Writing Prompts

An ongoing collection of prompts, topics, ideas, models, and revision techniques.

Writing Prompt: The Metaphor Quiz

This is what we call a “Metaphor Quiz.”

It’s a super way to write a praise poem for yourself, announcing yourself. It’s fun.

It also helps students understand what metaphor is, which is basically saying X is Y. It’s an analogy—like in SATs, A is to B as X is to Y, etc.—but it’s more than that.  Metaphor transforms language; it is a movement from one kind of world (literal) to another (poetic, image-driven, metaphorical). Metaphor comes from the Latin and Greek words for to move or carry over. A taxis in Italy sometimes has a sign affixed to its side: metaphora.

Metaphor is just one of a variety of uses of language in which what is communicated is not what the words mean literally.  We use indirect language every day: utterances that mean one thing, but say another. If you ask someone “what time is it?” that person will then look at his or her watch or cellphone; you didn’t ask her to do that, but that’s what she did after you asked the question. 

Metaphor takes it to another level: you talk about one thing by talking about another.  It’s one of the most powerful tools our language can have, and the wonderful thing about it is we pick up metaphor as soon as we acquire language; if anything, as we get older, we become resistant to metaphor, even suspicious of it.  We distrust what metaphors do because as we become more and more immersed in the literal world, it takes more effort to switch gears over to a world where one thing means or is something else. 

STEP ONE: For the following Metaphor Quiz questions, answer as yourself; or, if you wish, answer as a character you would like to use in a story or praise poem. If you really connect with a metaphor, or think it really works in your praise poem, expand on it.  Tell us why or describe the metaphorical object or quality in detail.

 

What color are you?

What musical instrument are you?

What facial expression are you?

What role in the school play are you?

What position on a soccer, football, baseball, basketball team are you?

Which celestial body, planet, or constellation are you?

Which musical group or singer are you?

What TV channel are you?

Which TV show are you?

What article of clothing are you?

Which brand or what kind of shoe are you?

Which body part are you?

What weapon are you?

What kind of house are you?

In your group of friends, are you the teacher or the student?

Are you a cat or a dog?

Are you a bicycle or a car?

What punctuation mark are you?

What kind of kiss or passionate embrace are you?

What kind of handshake are you?

What kind of song are you?

What font or typeface are you?

What kind of cellphone are you?

Which chemical or element are you?

Are you fire, water, ice, smoke?

Which movie star are you?

Which kind of tree are you?

Which vegetable?  Fruit?  Soup?  Meat?

What season are you?

What beverage or drink are you?

What town are you?

What kind of a book are you?

What kind of a magazine are you?

STEP TWO: Once you have your answers, turn each into a statement or lines that celebrate or talk about yourself. Let’s say your favorite color is magenta, your favorite drink is warm coffee, and so on. You could write.

I am magenta, a cup of warm coffee, a firm handshake, an apple in spring, a Honda with a bumping bass.

I am a son of South Jersey, a low rancher with thin walls.

STEP THREE: Make up new metaphor quiz questions. Mix. Match. Add adjectives. Make it rhyme. Don’t make it rhyme.

1 Comment

Filed under English218Spring2013, Handouts, Poetry in Performance, Writing Prompts

Make Your Own Map of Influences

Above: Detail from Brendan Griffin’s “The Graph of Ideas.”

Marian Bantjes’ beautiful “influence map.”

Cory Arcangel’s “genealogies.”

Influence Map template/meme.

A website that makes a music map of a particular artist.

From Noupe.com, “Stunning infographics and data visualization.”

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Writing Prompts

Mind Mapping Assignment

At points in the writing process, it’s helpful to use clustering, sometimes called “idea mapping” or “mind mapping.” It means what it sounds: you draw a map of possible subtopics and ideas that have to do with your general starting topic or assignment, on a single paper. It’s a graphic representation of your mind, or at least the parts of your mind used for your current project.

Mind map

Formally defined, a mind map is “a diagram used to represent concepts, ideas or tasks linked to and arranged radially around a central key word or idea” (Burgess-Allen 406). Visual and non-linear, mind maps often helps make connections and analyze ideas for some thinkers, both qualitative and quantitative ideas well as the more conceptual and data-driven. It’s been proven to aid in retention (i.e., studying, learning) as well as developing ideas (i.e., brainstorming, revising).

What makes mind mapping different than, say, making an outline or a list? In a mind map, “any idea can be connected to any other,” writes Martin Davies in Higher Education. “Free-form, spontaneous thinking is required when creating a mind map, and the aim of mind mapping is to find creative associations between ideas. Thus, mind maps are principally association maps.”

Your in-class assignment is to make a mind map for your “Worst Song” essay.

What appears above is a very rough clustering map I dug up from when I was writing about the song “Your Love” by The Outfield. It may not look like much, but it did help me figure out where to start and which topics I could talk about.  The finished essay appears online here.

English: This mindmap (Mind map) consists of r...

Here’s how you do it.

Put the song title in the middle and surround it with at least 15 cluster ideas. Draw arrows between them and make connections. Add text to your arrows to explain those connections and relations (something I didn’t do at first, but is pretty important). Try to have your own system to delineate which ideas are big topics, which ones are small. Your big ideas might be in boxes, for example, with side topics in little bubbles. You might want to use different colors.

Break them down this way, roughly using another mind map, perhaps the OG of all mind maps, the rhetorical triangle of text (logos, or evidence, research) -> author (ethos, or personal evidence, bona fides, due diligence, self-interrogation) -> audience (pathos, or laying out one’s argument, getting across your idea).

Writer: Five clusters from your personal/autobiographical/first-person point of view; your reactions to/feelings towards/associations with the song.

Topic: Five from your initial web research (describe the song, summarize/important quotes from lyric, name of artist, songwriter, year, album, chart position), Simon Frith article, peer-reviewed articles.

Audience: Five views, reviews, interpretations or connections you can make with the song to explain this song to your readers.

There are several clustering/idea mapping sites where you can create this kind of drawing online. MindMeister is one; there are many others. You can also use a word processing software. In our class, we’re going to do it old school style in freehand.

Works Cited

Brinkmann, A. “Graphical Knowledge Display – Mind-mapping and Concept-mapping as Efficient Tools in Mathematics Education.” In: P. Perks and S. Prestage, eds. Mathematics Education Review, The Journal of Association of Mathematics Education Teachers. 16 (2003): 39-48. Academic Search Premier. Web. 16 September 2012.

Burgess-Allen, Jilla and Owen-Smith, Vicci. “Using mind mapping techniques for rapid qualitative data analysis in public participation processes.” Health Expectations. 13 (2010): 406–415. Academic Search Premier. Web. 16 September 2012.

Davis. Martin. “Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: what are the differences and do they matter?” Higher Education. 62 (2011): 279-301. Academic Search Premier. Web. 16 September 2012.

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Writing Prompts

The Immersion Writing Assignment

Cover of "The Year of Living Biblically: ...

Cover via Amazon

Immersion writing, or immersion journalism, is a purposefully catch-all term of the kind of nonfiction writing in which the writer becomes involved with a subject or event personally, either by joining, embedding, taking the place of, walking in the shoes of, or otherwise embodying  some aspect of another person’s life.

The term breaks into many subdivisions, among them Gonzo Journalism, Participatory JournalismNew Journalism, or even the New New Journalism. All refer to reporting or writing in which the reader senses a specific person reporting, rather than the third-person “objective,” “voice of God,” hard news brand of journalism.

This kind of authorial/writerly presence started out rather subtly in the last century in places such as the New Yorker, Esquire, and Rolling Stone. Some early incarnations are still around.  You might see evidence in the old black and white movie in which you will see a newspaperman dictate a story and refer to him or herself as “this reporter,” or when a TV news reporter refers to a royal we: “We decided to find out about …”

Later, starting in the mid-1950s or so, journalism started to involve the reporter directly; he or she became part of the story, or is at least acknowledged as being present during the action described. One touchstone is Truman Capote‘s In Cold Blood, in which Capote, reporting on a multiple homicide in a small town in Kansas, reports on the participants in the story–victims, lawmen, murderers–and employs narrative techniques associated with fiction. Capote referred to his work as a “”nonfiction novel.”

One way I can think of teaching you about this would be those moments when you are watching a TV news report of victims of Hurricane Katrina, and you say to yourself or shout at the screen, “Why doesn’t the reporter help those people get on the rescue boat?”  Well, it might not seem so new these days, but beginning with New Journalism, the reporter not only did in fact help the people get on the rescue boat, then wrote about his or her feelings about it.  The writer breaks the fourth wall and immerses inside the story; she participates.

Other times you may read a profile of a movie star in a magazine—Esquire or Vogue, ones that are a step above the trashy gossip magazines—and you will get a sense of the reporter.  A writer will admit to being flustered by really being in front of Brad Pitt or Halle Berry.

Examples of Immersion Journalism

George  Plimpton just about invented participatory journalism, at least of the stunt variety.  One of his many stunts was when he got in the ring with boxer Archie Moore (above) for three rounds in 1959 and wrote about it for Sports Illustrated. Another, “Zero of the Lions,” also from Sports Illustratedinvolved him playing a scrimmage game for the Detroit LionsRead Wendell Maxey’s appreciation of Plimpton here.

Fast-forward 50 years and we have “Hot Boys Sleeper,” by Melissa Walker, a piece about sleeping over at a male model’s apartment, which appeared Elle Girl. Hey, somebody’s gotta do it.

Perhaps less frivolously, Barbara Ehrenreich’s 2001 Nickel and Dimed chronicles the author’s experience of taking on a series of minimum-wage jobs to see how people survive on 6- and 7-dollar and hour jobs. [sample chapter]

Julie and Julia began as a blog immersing inside the world of Julia Child’s recipes, was made into a book, then became a movie.

Hunter S. Thompson’s Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.

 

Book-length Immersion Memoirs 

Maria Dahvana Headley (The Year of Yes)

Robin Hemley (Do-Over! In Which a Forty-Eight-Year-Old Father of Three Returns to Kindergarten, Summer Camp, the Prom, and Other Embarrassments)

A.J. Jacobs (The Year of Living Biblically, The Guinea Pig Diaries, The Know-It-All)

Danny Wallace (Yes Man)

Immersion-Style Documentaries

Ross McElwee (Sherman’s March)

Morgan Spurlock (Super-Size Me)

The Assignment

Pick an activity or change in behavior for yourself for a period of time and write about it from that point of view. Research aspects of your subject.

Interview people.

Relate it to what’s else is going on in the culture, or its relevance to the news or time of year. 1,000-2,000 words.

Take at least three photos.

Ideas? Collect tickets at a Madison Theater Midnight Show. Dress up as a bear. Ride along with an Albany taxi driver. Work with the chefs in the Saint Rose Cafeteria for a lunch hour. Coach with a Saint Rose sports team. Work as a tanning salon counterperson or Washington Tavern busboy. Play bingo at a senior center. Speak in a different accent all day or decide not to speak all day. Go without your cellphone for an entire weekend. Go to a different church than you usually do for a couple weeks. Wear different clothes or make-up or otherwise take on a different appearance than usual. Die your hair a different color.

(Some of these examples are from past students; you of course can come up with your own.)

Research. Find out aspects of your immersive world: its history, archetypes, myths, sayings, practitioners. Interview people who do what you are about to do and while you’re doing it.

Take notes: your reactions, senses.  Offer contrasts to your normal life.

Find a “news peg” on which to hang your story. Place your immersive activity into the popular culture conversation or zeitgeist. This is your “hook,” how you might make whatever you do relevant to a current audience.`

 

Comments Off

Filed under English311Fall2012, Writing Prompts

Writing Prompt: Abecedarian

An abecedarian, according to the Academy of American Poets website:

The abecedarian is an ancient poetic form guided by alphabetical order. Generally each line or stanza begins with the first letter of the alphabet and is followed by the successive letter, until the final letter is reached. The earliest examples are Semitic and often found in religious Hebrew poetry. The form was frequently used in ancient cultures for sacred compositions, such as prayers, hymns, and psalms. There are numerous examples of abecedarians in the Hebrew Bible; one of the most highly regarded is Psalm 118 (or 119 by King James numbering). It consists of twenty-two eight-line stanzas, one for each letter of the Hebrew alphabet. Chaucer’s “An ABC” is an excellent medieval example of the form. He crafted his translation of a French prayer into twenty-three eight-line stanzas that follow the alphabet (minus J, U, V, and W).

Examples:

Coming soon!

Comments Off

Filed under Writing Prompts

The Worst Song I Ever Loved (TWSIEL) Essay

Prewriting (“Coming to a Reckoning” paragraphs related to Frith article, minor research, 5 pages of I Remembersdue in folder “02 Worst Song Prewriting” by Friday, September 7, by 11:59pm.

Rough Drafts of The Worst Song I Ever Loved Assignment due in folder “03 Worst Song Rough Draft” by Friday, September 14, by 11:59pm.

Final Drafts of The Worst Song I Ever Loved Assignment due in folder “03 Worst Song Final Draft” by TBA.

Description of Assignment

This assignment is to write a personal essay on The Worst Song I Ever Loved, or TWSIEL (pronounced TWI-sul).  

Just how you define The Worst Song I Ever Loved is an important part of the assignment. Some might use the term “guilty pleasure,” something you liked but somehow thought you shouldn’t like it for any number of reasons. Maybe you really love the theme to Rocky II, Survivor’s “Eye of the Tiger.” It might be a song most other people hate, or one that runs counter to your own usual tastes. You and your friends might like emo rock music, for example, but when you’re alone, you find yourself singing along to Fergie’s “Girls Don’t Cry.” It could be a song you heard over and over again at a job, and eventually found it to be “your jam.” It could be a song that, although horrible to your ears, brings back a poignant or meaningful memory in your life.

Either way, your job in this assignment is to answer the question: What was the worst song you ever loved?

Readings

Frith, Simon. “What is Bad Music?”

Marcus, Greil. “Stories of a Bad Song.” is an essay on a Bob Dylan song that addresses much of what we’re talking about here.

Nester, Daniel. “Josie Reconsidered: Notes on The Outfield’s ‘Your Love’”

Popdose’s “World’s Worst Songs” feature.

Specifications/Area of Assessment (% of Grade)

Participation, presentation, process: Informal writing work (Reckoning/Remembers); In-class writing, group, and research work; Presentations (20%)

Identifiable idea that is your own (20%)

Quotes, paraphrases, and summaries: Includes explorations of Frith reading, with summary, paraphrase, and at least one direct quote; show evidence of studying these topics from the Teaching Blog (20%)

Research: Include at least three (3) outside sources in this essay relating to your TWSIEL and/or your ideas surrounding it; at least one (1) scholarly source from one of the library’s academic databases, all cited according to the your chosen citation style (APA or MLA); the others may be newspaper or magazine articles, also from databases (20%)

Word limit: 700-1000 words (10%)

Proper MLA/APA manuscript format: margins, running header, font, double-spacing (10%)

 

 

About Research

This means finding out the basics, which includes everything about your song. The name(s) of the songwriter, performer, singer. Who played what instrument on the song? What other songs are the songwriters known for? When and where was it recorded? Where does this song figure in the artist’s career? How long is the song? Are there covers of the song on YouTube? How high in the charts (iTunes, Billboard) did it chart, if it did land on the charts? Provide some context: What was in the news the day the song reaches its highest position on the charts or some other specific day you can remember related to this song? Summarize, paraphrase, and quote from this story and relate/contrast to one of your ideas.  Must Library’s news databases, not Google.

Once you start developing some ideas, you’re going to conduct a second kind of research, one that has less to do with gathering expository information, but more with your paper’s eventual ideas. You might not know much about dance music or disco, for example, or diva lead singers. Here is the trick, and this is where a lot of student writers run into what they think are problems, but really are not: this research will most likely not bring up your song specifically. It will be up to you to make the connections.

Some Writing Prompts

Watch, or re-watch, the music video. Give us your reactions and compare it to your reactions back when you loved this song.

When, where, why, how, and with whom did I first hear the song? If you don’t remember, try; write “I must have first heard this song “when/where/because]…”

When, where, why, and how, did you realize you fell in love with this song?

What did you do back when you loved this song? Activities? Friends you hung out with?

What kinds of clothes was I wearing when I heard this song? What group of friends did I have? Did I dance to this song? Describe the dance.

Did you know the song was terrible then, or did someone take you aside and convince or remind you of it being terrible. Or did you not realize until years later? Name the time and place. Again, be specific.

Why did I/do I love this song? Try: “I think I loved this song then because…”

Do you still love this song, even though it is now considered horrible/not hip/differs from your current tastes?

When and how did I realize or teach myself that this was the worst song I ever loved?

Contrast: Discuss 1. Worst Song You Ever Loved and 2. another song you love right now, and are not sure you will love in the future and 3. and song you will probably will love for the rest of your life. What are the differences between and among these 2-3 songs?

A few subtopics that could be covered in such an essay:

Aesthetics, taste. One person’s awful song is another person’s wedding theme. How do you define taste?

Changing tastes over time. Why do our tastes change?  What influences, outside and inside, affect how our tastes change? Do events and relationships in our lives affect what songs we enjoy and don’t enjoy hearing?

Musical analysis. What makes this song tick? Why are some songs catchy and others not-so-catchy? Who wrote the song? Who produced it?  What kind of recording–instruments, autotune, vocal recording–went into the putting together of this song?  What else did that person write? Is it a cover of an earlier version? Are there cover versions on YouTube, for example, that make you think of the song in different ways?

Lyrics. Do a close reading of the lyrics. Are there puns, allusions? What do the lyrics mean to you, and what to they mean to others?

Place in popular culture. Has this song appeared in any commercials, movies, TV shows?  Is the song still popular today? What was the public reception–reviews, articles, commentary–at the time of the song’s release?  What is the perception today?

Sensibility: nostalgia, camp, kitsch.  is tricky. Talking about sensibility, but’s it often a vital thing to address, especially when a song that is taken seriously one day by some people is then looked on as a goof, dated, or out-of-fashion the next. The idea that something is so bad it’s good is not a new one, and neither is the idea of reclaiming a song with full knowledge that a song is cheesy. How can you address this?  Is your song now used to bring back an earlier, innocent time?

Musical history, context, marketing. Popular music is marketed to specific people, but it’s not just those people who listen to popular music. Did you listen to an “adult” song as a child?  Is your reception of that song different?

Topic: your big idea, thesis, or rhetorical triangle connections

After you come up with the takeaway idea from your own experience of the song (which also can include expository research and analysis of your song), after the subtopic you develop from your research and analyses of the song and the context around it, comes your topic.

Your topic is the third point of the rhetorical triangle, after writer and audience. Many times, a paper will attempt to persuade a reader and present and support an argument. You might do that there, but probably not. More than likely you will have a single idea that will emerge from your other subtopics as a result of your research and critical reckonings.

Possibly Related Articles That May Help You Get Started

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Writing Prompts

Thirteen Ways of Looking at X

This writing prompt is inspired by the Wallace Stevens poem, “Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird” as well as Kenneth Koch‘s assignment in his book, Rose, Where Did You Get That Red? “The poetry idea was, ‘Write a poem in which you talk about the same thing in a number of different ways,’” Koch writes.

In this version of the assignment, first worked out with students in Arc of Rennselaer County, we made up the “ways of looking” as we went along.  We were in a classroom at The Arts Center of the Capital Region, its windows facing the Hudson River, which lent itself to modeling our poem directly with Stevens mention of a river (“The river is moving./The blackbird must be flying”).

1. Turn X upside down and write what you see.

2. Where does it live? What kind of weather is there?

3. What would a child say to it? Use exact words (baby talk), or describe what a child would say or talk about upon first seeing X.

4. Describe its eyes. Or “eyes.” What is X looking at? Is X sad? Happy?

5. What is your favorite part of X?

6. Think of a nickname for X. Then address it with a question. Begin: “Oh, X, how/when/what if, etc.?”

7. Go to the nearest window. Describe what you see.

8. Two parts: a. Tell us what you do to get to sleep; b. Then tell us how X goes to sleep.

9. Think of the person you most admire. What would your favorite person say about X?

10. Flying through the air, _________ (what does X do?).

11. Numbers, equations.

12. The river is _______. X must be______.

13. Just mention snow. You don’t have to use the word snow. Just think about it and write something. Or snow.

Comments Off

Filed under Writing Prompts

The Short Review Assignment

Due: XXXX. Name document LastnameFirstnameShortReview and XXXX

Description:

Write a review of no fewer than 275 words and no more than 300 words. Examples: episode of a television show, a new CD by a recording artist, a book, performance, or online video. These should be recent—released, performed, or aired in the past six months. The writing is informal and will not include academic citations.

That assignment description is deceptively simple and straightforward. It will most likely be the hardest assignment to do well.

If you just go by the word count of this assignment, you might think you can dash off this assignment in less than an hour. More than likely for you, this won’t be the case, or the result will be less than excellent.

In this assignment, for example, you should include all the relevant expository details you think your readers will need. You might need to describe a television show (type of show, history, current state of its ratings or quality), add context (is this the artist’s debut, comeback attempt, or a departure?), summarize (general plot of the book/TV show/movie), background information for the laymen (is this a ballet, jazz, modern dance performance), or generally describe its production or the producer (if it’s a Funny or Die video, for instance, that would bear mentioning).

Other things to keep in mind:

Cut out all unnecessary language

Do this to keep inside your word count, but it’s also about keeping your writing going at an economic pace. If you are going to write, “I think the latest Beastie Boys release is the best they have done since Check Your Head,” chop it down to its essential parts. Consider the kind of shorthand that review writers use. Examples:

“The latest Beastie Boys release is the best they have done since Check Your Head.” (Took out “I think,” which is understood.)

“The latest Beasties release is the best they’ve done since Check Your Head.” (Shortened to Beasties, made “they have” a contraction.)

“The latest Beasties is the best since Check Your Head.” (Took out “they’ve done,” since who would have “done” this besides the Beasties?)

Review something you know really well, but keep in mind your readers don’t know it as well as you. This might seem understood, but you need to keep in mind your audience won’t be as up-to-date on what you are writing about; this is the reason why people read reviews! See the part about expository details above.

Thread an idea throughout your review.

This might mean doing some research. If you are writing about the new Beastie Boys, you might talk about how they haven’t released a CD in a while because one of their members, Adam Yauch, was diagnosed with cancer and was receiving treatment. You could also mention that, shortly after the diagnosis, Jay-Z paid tribute to them at the music festival “All Points West,” which might indicate that the Beasties are still relevant. This would give some context when you talk about their latest CD, Hot Sauce Committee Part Two.

You could use this idea-threading to introduce an idea you have had about your subject. Maybe you have always thought John Mayer was a better guitar player than people give him credit for, that publicity about his love life overshadows his musicianship. Use that as your connecting thoughts.

Have a lede/lead that interests your reader

So maybe you don’t want to go the thread-an-idea route. Fine.  You can still write an able review without having an overall concept. But one thing you do want to include is an opening, or lead (called a lede in old school journalism, so as to not confuse with the real lead material used in typesetting). A lead opens your piece, grabs attention of your readers. Examples? Begin with a question: Have people forgotten about the Beastie Boys? Or begin with a bold statement: People have forgotten about the Beastie Boys. Or begin with a story: When Jay-Z subbed for the Beasties at the 2009 All Points West, it reminded us of how important they are to the history of hip-hop.

Examples of Published Short Reviews: 

Time Out New York review of new CD by The Strokes

Time Out New York review of latest Kanye West

Time Out New York review of latest Katy Perry

It’s a bit longer than your assignment, but The Onion AV Club’s review of 16 and Pregnant is a great example of TV reviewing with an idea threaded through.

At 317 words, this review of Scream 4, also from The Onion AV Club, presents an idea about sequels in general as well as the work of the screenplay of the movie in particular.

Recent Onion movie reviews.

Time Out New York book reviews.

Comments Off

Filed under Handouts, Writing Prompts

Writing Prompt: Write a Sestina Version of your Writing*

*Or just, you know, write a sestina.

What is a sestina? From the Academy of American Poets site:

The sestina follows a strict pattern of the repetition of the initial six end-words of the first stanza through the remaining five six-line stanzas, culminating in a three-line envoi. The lines may be of any length, though in its initial incarnation, the sestina followed a syllabic restriction. The form is as follows, where each numeral indicates the stanza position and the letters represent end-words:

1. ABCDEF
2. FAEBDC
3. CFDABE
4. ECBFAD
5. DEACFB
6. BDFECA
7. (envoi) ECA or ACE

The envoi, sometimes known as the tornada, must also include the remaining three end-words, BDF, in the course of the three lines so that all six recurring words appear in the final three lines. In place of a rhyme scheme, the sestina relies on end-word repetition to effect a sort of rhyme.

1. Pick six words that are important to your story, piece, poem, essay.

2. Put them into a sestina generator, like this one. Or use this sestina template [pdf].

3. Re-write your piece sestina-style.

Comments Off

Filed under Revision Techniques, Writing Prompts

Collaborative Writing: Some Exercises

Group sestina. Generator here.

Abecedarian, using alphabetical order as its design. (Psalms 31:10-31, the famous “virtuous woman” passage,” is actually an abecedarian acrostic using the Hebrew alphabet.)

Exquisite corpse.

One line at a time (without concealment, as in exquisite corpse). Called a “simple pass” here.

Renga.

One word at a time–out loud, with a note-taker, or with one person typing, or both writing/typing.

“All Together Now: Collaborations in Poetry Writing.” EdSITEment. National Endowment for the Humanities. Contains lesson plans for grades K-2.

Poetry comics.

Bouts-rimés, or rhyme challenge. James Addison, as he is quoted this entry in The Wikipedia, describes this as a “[list] of words that rhyme to one another, drawn up by another hand, and given to a poet, who was to make a poem to the rhymes in the same order that they were placed upon the list.” Here is an encyclopedia entry.

Some peer-reviewed research on collaborative poetry in the classroom.

Gillespie, Charles. “The use of collaborative poetry as a method of deepening interpersonal communication among adolescent girls.” Journal of Poetry Therapy. 18:4 (December 2005), 221-231. <http://www.cottonwooddetucson.com/pdf/Staff_Arti>.

Gillespie, Charles. “Recovery Poetry 101: The use of collaborative poetry in a dual-diagnosis drug and alcohol treatment program.” Journal of Poetry Therapy. 15:2 (Winter 2001), 83-92.

Comments Off

Filed under Writing Prompts

Writing Prompt: Skeltonic Verse

Here’s how poet and editor Robert Lee Brewer defines Skeltonic Verse, sometimes Tumbling Verse:

Skeltonic verse is named after the poet John Skelton (1460-1529), who wrote short rhyming lines that just sort of go on from one rhyme to the next for however long you wish to take it. Most skeltonic poems average less than six words a line, but keeping the short rhymes moving down the page is the real key to this form.

Here is an example of Skeltonic verse from the man himself:

The Tunnyng of Elynour Rummyng by John Skelton (L1-L11)
Tell you I chyll,
If that ye wyll
A whyle be styll,
of a comely gyll
That dwelt on a hyll:
But she is not gryll,
For she is somewhat sage
And well worne in age;
for her visage
It would aswage
A mannes courage.

 

Examples of Skeltonic Verse in Rap

Five hundred years on, Skeltonic verse is alive and well in performance poetry and hip-hop. Here are some examples from the period of hip-hop when I was growing up.

 

You’re a back-seat queen, a elevator pro
A high-powered body makes your Levis grow
See the stories I’ve heard, they could amaze
I heard she did it on a motorcycle back in the days
So calm down freak, get a G.E.D.
That’s a General Education on Decency
One day you’ll see, and agree with me
unless you’re gonna be a freak until you’re 93
For you there’s no fee, everything is free
This is from me to you, not you to me
Every night is your night, your leather pants are tight
You try to shake your butt with all your might
I don’t really wanna dis nobody
You might think I had a little too much Bacardi
But that’s not the problem, the problem’s Yvette
How bad can a girl’s reputation get?
See she’s the kinda girl all the homeboys met
If you’re desparate ask Yvette, cuz she’ll say “Bet.”

from “Dear Yvette” by LL Cool J [1:30-2:38]

 

Yo Kangol, I don’t think that you’re dense
Buy you went about the matter with no experience
You should know, she doesn’t need a guy like you
She needs a guy like me, with a high IQ
And she’ll take to my rap, cause my rap’s the best
The educated rapper MD will never fess
So when I met her, I wasted no time
But stuck-up Roxanne paid me no mind
She thought my name was Barry, I told her it was Gary
She said she didn’t like it so she chose to call me Barry
She said she’d love to marry, my baby she would carry
And if she had a baby, she’d name the baby Harry
Her mother’s name is Baby, which is really quite contrary
Her face is very hairy, and you can say it’s scary
So isn’t not every, her father’s a fairy
His job is secretary, in some military
He throws them to an electric camp that wasn’t voluntary
His daughter’s name is Sherry, his sons are Tom and Jerry
Jerry had the flu but it was only temporary
Back in January, or was it February?
But everytime I say this rhyme it makes me kinda weary
It’s only customary to give this commentary
Some say it’s bad, some say it’s legendary
You searchin’ all you want, try your local library
You’ll never find a rhyme like this in any dictionary
But do you know, after all that
All I received was a pat on the back
That’s what you get, it happened to me
Ain’t that right Mixmaster I-C-E

from “Roxanne Roxanne” by UTFO [1:17-2:35]


Yes the rhythm, the rebel
Without a pause—I’m lowerin’ my level
The hard rhymer where you never been I’m in me
You want stylin’ you know it’s time again
D the enemy tellin you to hear it
They praised the music this time they play the lyrics
Some say no to the album, the show
Bum rush the sound I made a year ago
I guess you know you guess I’m just a radical
Not a sabbatical—yes, to make it critical
The only part of your body should be parting to
Panther power on the hour from the rebel to you

from “Rebel Without a Pause” by Public Enemy [0:00-0:43]

 

 

Comments Off

Filed under Writing Prompts

The Five-Paragraph Essay: Handout and Outline

PDF version here.

I. Introductory Paragraph

 

General Topic Sentence

 

Subtopic One

Subtopic Two

Subtopic Three

Transition

 

II. First Supporting Paragraph

 

Restate Subtopic One

 

First Supporting Detail or Example

Second Supporting Detail or Example

Third Supporting Detail or Example

Transition

 

III. Second Supporting Paragraph

 

Restate Subtopic Two

 

First Supporting Detail or Example

Second Supporting Detail or Example

Third Supporting Detail or Example

Transition

 

IV. Third Supporting Paragraph

 

Restate Subtopic Three

 

First Supporting Detail or Example

Second Supporting Detail or Example

Third Supporting Detail or Example

Transition

 

V. Closing or Summary Paragraph

 

Synthesis of main topic

 

Synthesis of Subtopic One

Synthesis of Subtopic Two

Synthesis of Subtopic Three

 

The Five-Paragraph Essay: Pimped Up

 

Intro: “Narrative lede”; emblematic scenario; personal narrative

 

I. Introductory Paragraph

 

General Topic Sentence

 

Subtopic One

Subtopic Two

Subtopic Three

Transition

 

II. First Supporting Paragraph

 

Transition; Restate Subtopic One

 

First Supporting Detail or Example

Second Supporting Detail or Example

Third Supporting Detail or Example

Transition

 

 

III. Second Supporting Paragraph

 

Transition; Restate Subtopic Two

 

First Supporting Detail or Example

Second Supporting Detail or Example

Third Supporting Detail or Example

Transition

 

 

Opposing viewpoint; considering the opposition

 

IV. Third Supporting Paragraph

 

Restate Subtopic Three

 

First Supporting Detail or Example

Second Supporting Detail or Example

Third Supporting Detail or Example

Transition

 

V. Closing or Summary Paragraph

 

Synthesis of main topic

 

Synthesis of Subtopic One

Synthesis of Subtopic Two

Synthesis of Subtopic Three

 

 

Bracket of intro: “Narrative lede”; emblematic scenario; personal narrative

 

 

 

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Essay Writing, Writing Prompts

Writing Prompt: Anaphora-Friendly Prepositions and Other Phrases

aboard

about

above

absent

according to

across

after

against

ahead of

all over

along

alongside

amid or amidst

among

around

as

as of

as to

aside

astride

at

away from

bar

barring

because of

before

behind

below

beneath

beside

besides

between

beyond

but

by

by the time of

circa

close by

close to

concerning

considering

despite

down

due to

during

except

except for

excepting

excluding

failing

for

from

in

in between

in front of

in spite of

in view of

including

inside

instead of

into

less

like

minus

near

near to

next to

notwithstanding

of

off

on

on top of

onto

opposite

out

out of

outside

over

past

pending

per

plus

regarding

respecting

round

save

saving

similar to

since

than

through

throughout

till

to

toward or towards

under

underneath

unlike

until

unto

up

upon

versus

via

wanting

while

with

within

without

Phrases:
What is the deal with
Maybe I
I remember
I don’t remember
When I get the money
Starting now
You know what?
Coordinating Conjunctions
For
And
Nor
But
Or
Yet
So
Subordinating Conjunctions
after, although, as, as if, as long as, as much as, as soon as, as though, because, before, by the time, even if, even though, if, in order that, in case, lest, once, only if, provided that, since, so that, than, that, though, till, unless, until, when, whenever, where, wherever, while

Correlative Conjunctions Pairings
both… and
either… or
neither… nor
not only… but also
whether… or

Adverbs and Adverbial Phrases
also, hence, however, still, likewise, otherwise, therefore, conversely, rather, consequently, furthermore, nevertheless, instead, moreover, then, thus, meanwhile, accordingly, of course, indeed, naturally, after all, in short, I hope, at least, earlier, next, lastly, later, before, after, then, now, soon, here, there, today, first, second, third, fourth, eventually, tomorrow, remarkably, in fact, I think, it seems, in brief, clearly, I suppose, assuredly, definitely, to be sure, without a doubt, for all that, on the whole, in any event, importantly, certainly

Comments Off

Filed under Writing Prompts

Writer Portrait Assignment

The purpose of this first assignment is to get to know each other in class, to start our conversation about writing, and to get each of your to present in front of the class as soon as possible. It’s also a way for me to see how you interpret assignments, gauge your knowledge of technology and mechanics and grammar-type terms. Oh, and to have some fun.

Assignment:

Interview one of your fellow students about their experience in writing. Take notes, not only what your subject says, but how he or she says it. Is he or she laughing while relaying information? Does he or she seem shy or outgoing?  Include your impressions, descriptions, context of your talk, as well as what you know about your partner from the ice-breaker-type answers.

Part 1. Ask your subject to tell you a story related to his or her experience in writing. Does your subject write in his or her spare time? Or one story from a previous class or assignment, or writing in general (status updates on Facebook/Twitter, etc.) that he or she remembers?

Part 2. Ask general questions about your subject’s own writing life and practice. Some possible examples:

Are you a confident writer?  Not so confident? Or does your subject hate writing, and dreads it? How about writing for pleasure? Does your subject keep a notebook? What does he or she need to work on?  Grammar? Spelling?  Reading? Level of interest? How about research? Or presenting in front of class?

In the written assignment, talk about your subject, but also try to answer these questions for yourself. One idea would be to contrast your own writing experience with your subject’s.

Specifications for In-Class Presentation:

  • Must be 2-4 minutes. No more, no less.
  • Summarize part of your conversation or what you plan to write, not all.
  • No notes. I’ll pass out one index card to each of you during class.

Specifications for Written Portrait:  

Word Count: 400-500 words

Presentations: Wednesday, August 29.

Put in folder in our class Dropbox called “01 Writer Portrait” by Friday, August 31, 11:59pm EST.

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Handouts, Writing Prompts

The Narration Essay Assignment

In its simplest terms: Tell us a story.  Tell us a good story.  Tell us a story that has a beginning, a middle, and an end.  Hold our attention.  Surprise us.  Entertain us.  Teach us a lesson.  (No fewer than five pages.)

 

Potential Topics For Narrative Essays (From The Sundance Reader)

 

* A childhood event that shaped your attitudes about a person, school, a sport.

* An incident that exposed you to danger.

* A work situation where your role as employee clashed with your personal values.

* Your first day at a job.

* The key play of an important game.

* A story repeatedly told by a friend or family member.

* The incident that caused you to quit a job, end a relationship, or make a decision.

* A band’s breakthough performance.

* The turning point in a person’s career or organization’s history.

* Your first experience in cyberspace.

 

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Essay Writing, Writing Prompts

The List of Ridiculous Paper Topics

Two hair scrunchies made from bead crochet: si...

Image via Wikipedia

Carrot Farming on the Moon: Pros and Cons

Morton Downey, Jr. and the New Testament: Did the Second Coming Already Happen?

Honey Boo-Boo and Female Body Issues

How Wearing Scrunchies Helps The Environment

We Can Put A Man On The Moon, But Why Can’t We Make Killer Robot Police?

Alf and Saved By The Bell: Better Than The Plays of William Shakespeare

Why Aerosol Cans and Packing Peanuts Should be Ranked as Our Society’s Greatest Achievements

Why All Novels Should Be Written in Comic Sans

How One Direction Saved American Culture

My Parents are Aliens But I Am Not: Some Theories Why This is So

How Casual Fridays Promote Adulterous Office Affairs

Global Warming: The Advantages of the Melting Ice Cap

How My Career in Little League Baseball/Softball/TeeBall Parallels Today’s Political Climate

Why Ben and Jerry’s Should Name an Ice Cream Treat After Me

Why Forwarded Junk Emails Can Solve Today’s Gender Pay Gap

High School Uniforms: Why Everyone Should Just Wear a Plain, Grey Jumpsuit

Why I Will Wear An Elegant, Fuschia Tuxedo To My Wedding

Arranged Marriages: How It Can Work For American Kindergardeners

Evolution, Shmevolution: Why Humans Should Be Classified as Amphibians

How Backstreet Boys Surpass Beethoven in Musical Achievement

Why and How Kim Kardashian Should Get a PhD in Elementary Education

I Am, In Point of Fact, a Fish; While Everyone Else is, In Point of Fact, a Four-Legged Mammal

Is Oprah Winfrey a Robot?  Some Proof

Proof That TV’s Judge Judy is an Alcoholic

Wearing Baseball Caps: Do They Lower Your Intelligence?

Why Albany Should Secede from the Union and Become Its Own Sovereign Country

Everything I Know About Fashion I Learned from Kim Il Jong

Cook a NY Strip with Yankee Candles and Never Go Back to Grilling

How Fritos® brand Corn Chips Can Be Used To Build Environmentally Friendly Homes

My Plans for World Domination: Why It Should Be Supported by the U.S. Government

Deforestation: The Advantages of a Treeless World

How Actor Sean Penn Will Single-Handedly Save The Ozone Layer

Enemas: The Best Way To Release Emotional Pain

Post-It Notes Are Living Organisms, Too

The Little Man Inside Your Refrigerator Needs More Exercise

Why Dry Erase Boards Cause Vertigo

How We Can Better Communicate With Bacteria

Guns Kill Other Guns: Did You Know?

How Coolidge’s “Dogs Playing Cards” is Superior to Da Vinci’s “The Last Supper”

Health Care for Infants: The Overrated Phenomenon

The More You Drive, The Less Intelligent You Are (inspiration here)

How Food Fights can Replace Nuclear Weapons

Domestic Camels: The New Puggle

The Politics of the Zombie Takeover

Oprah and the End of Jersey Shore: The Secret Connection

Subjunctive Interpolation in the Sinister Poetics of the Dickman Twins

How Listening to Death Metal Can Relax and Pacify You

The Pros and Cons of Earning an MFA in Writing: Will it Increase Your Odds of Making the New York Times Best Sellers List?

Why elephants shouldn’t be allowed to use roller skates

Quantum Manifold Shifting Effects on the Layering of Tropes in Post-Modernist Flash Fiction.

People that drive volkswagens care more about the environment and here’s why

Broccoli & Religion

Law and Order Special Victims Unit: How a sex crimes show is uplifting, inspiring and the feel good show we all need to gain spiritual harmony

A Rising Tide Lifts All Boats: How Giving Billionaires More Money Is Gonna Empty The Projects

What’s better: Chocolate or Vanilla

How To Steal A Tiffany Diamond Via Three-card Monty

Why Internet Memes Should Be Used as Cover Letter Objectives (inspired by this article: http://bit.ly/RxmAwR )

Fucking Up: Dating Strategies for Maximum Class Mobility and their Potential Pitfalls

Vagina Jokes are Funny Too and Here’s Why

Why We See Jesus in Burnt Toast: Visual Culture and Rhe Theater of the Absurd

Reality Show This! Carnival Act and Freak Show Mishaps

Lucy and Ricky were Right: How Separate Beds Lead to Better Marriages

Pass the Purell: Why a Dog’s Mouth is More Sanitary than the Unwashed Human Hand

Evolutionary Wonder: How the Behavior of Readjusting One’s Crotch Saved the Human Species from Extinction

How Deferment of Student Loans can Give you Good Credit

Glenn Danzig and Kitty Litter: The Intrinsic Connection

Why Saccharin Should Not be Banned

Road Warrior: How Minivan-driving Soccer Moms Have Turned Car-pooling Into Gang Warfare

Midnight Ping-Pong as Explanation for International Politics

Blue Agave Tequila: The Rejuvenating Properties of Worm Urine

How Hot Plates Cause Sterility in Juvenile Mountain Goats

Hair Dye and Male Menstruation: Why You Should Eat More Carrots

Running On The Wheel: Hamster Habitats As A Model For City Planning

Michael Jackson: Thriller or Vanilla?

Why It Pays To Be A Half-wit In Academia

Comments Off

Filed under Writing Prompts

A Collection of Oulipo Exercises

Meeting of the Oulipo in Boulogne, near Paris, on September 23, 1975, in the garden of François Le Lionnais (Italo Calvino is in the center with an open newspaper, at founder Raymond Queneau’s right).

Oulipo, or OuLiPo, stands for “Ouvroir de littérature potentielle,” which translates roughly as “workshop of potential literature.” It is a loose gathering of French-speaking writers and mathematicians, and seeks to create works using constrained writing techniques. It was founded in 1960 by Raymond Queneau and François Le Lionnais. Other notable members include novelists Georges Perec and Italo Calvino, poet and mathematician Jacques Roubaud, and one American member, Harry Mathews. The group defines the term ‘littérature potentielle’ as (rough translation): “the seeking of new structures and patterns which may be used by writers in any way they enjoy.”

Constraints are used as a means of triggering ideas and inspiration, most notably Perec’s “story-making machine,” which he used in the construction of Life: A User’s Manual. As well as established techniques, such as lipograms (Perec’s novel A Void) and palindromes, the group devises new techniques, often based on mathematical problems such as the Knight’s Tour of the chess-board and permutations.

“Oulipo” entry. Wikipedia. 13 October 2005. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oulipo>.

The Un-Redundancy Exercise

also known as “haikuization”

Materials: piece of writing.

  1. Select a piece of writing.
  2. For each line, replace it with only one, two, or three words, either from the end or the beginning of the line. Decide on the number depending on how long the piece of writing’s lines are, and stick to that number.
  3. For example, if a line of a piece of writing is:
    I called up my sister and she started to chew me out.
    Replace it with the following:
    Chew me out.
  4. Repeat until end of piece of writing.

Variation: The Slugogram To slug your work in proofreading is to match up the words in the right-hand margin to quickly make sure nothing was changed from printout to printout.  In this variation, you just use the last right-hand word in your draft and start over, write a sentence using those slugged words.

Adapted from: Motte, Warren F., trans. and ed. Oulipo: A Primer of Potential Literature.  Normal, IL: Dalkey Archive Press, 1986.

Raymond Queneau, disussing this constraint, writes:

What is the point of this? Primo, I obtain a new poem which, upon my word, is not so bad, and one should never complain if one finds beautiful poems.  Secundo, one has the impression that there is almost as much in the restriction as in the entire poem … Tertio: without going to the far limits of sacrilege, one can say that this restriction sheds light on the original poem; it is not wholly without exegetical value and may contribute to interpretation. (59)

The Isomorphism Exercise

Materials: piece of writing.

  1. Select a piece of writing.
  2. For each word, replace it with a word that sounds like the word phonetically, syllable for syllable. For example, if a line of a piece of writing is:
    I called up my sister and she started to chew me out.
    Replace it with the following:
    My hauled cup high mister hand he hearted two stew she gout.
  3. Obviously, don’t worry about making sense so much.  Just replace the words that sound like them.
  4. Repeat until end of piece of writing.

Adapted from: Motte, Warren F., trans. and ed. Oulipo: A Primer of Potential Literature.  Normal, IL: Dalkey Archive Press, 1986.

The N + 7 Exercise

Materials: English dictionary, piece of writing.

  1. Select a piece of writing.
  2. Underline all of the substantial nouns in the piece of writing; in other words, underline all the nouns except for pronouns (he, she, it, we, you, they).
  3. Look up a noun in the dictionary.
  4. From that noun’s entry in the dictionary, count forward alphabetically seven (7) noun entries.
  5. Replace the first noun with this new, N + 7 noun you just found.
  6. Repeat until end of piece of writing.

Don’t have a print dictionary?  First, shame on you.  Second, did you know there was an online N+7 generator? We didn’t either. Now we’re in bidness!  The N+7 method involves replace every noun in a text with the word that falls 7 places ahead of it in the dictionary. No more telling students to bring their print dictionaries into class. (They don’t own them, for one).

One variation: use results include the texts as N+0 (i.e., the original version), N+1, N+2, on up to N+15.

Another variation: Use Princeton’s Wordnet instead.

Adapted from: Motte, Warren F., trans. and ed. Oulipo: A Primer of Potential Literature.  Normal, IL: Dalkey Archive Press, 1986.

The False Translation Exercise
also known as “false translation,” “homophonic translation,” or “homolinguistic translation”

Materials: non-English text, piece of writing.

  1. Select a passage of text—it can be a poem, but it doesn’t need to be—in a language other than English for which you have received no instruction, formal or informal
  2. A text from a Romance Language (Spanish, Italian, French, Romanian, Portuguese), but Latin and German and others work as well
  3. Going word by word, “translate” each word or group of words to resemble utterances, thoughts, phrases in English.
  4. Repeat until end of selected text.

Adapted from:

Motte, Warren F., trans. and ed. Oulipo: A Primer of Potential Literature.  Normal, IL: Dalkey Archive Press, 1986.

The Lipogram Exercise

A lipogram is a text that excludes on or more letters of the alphabet.  There are, obviously, harder and easier versions of writing or creating a lipogram: exluding a vowel would be more difficult than exluding z, , x, or u.

“The lipogram often passes unnoticed until it is announced,” Harry Mathews writes.

Materials: non-English text, piece of writing.

  1. Select a passage of text to re-write (your own or someone else’s) of or use a blank page.
  2. Select your lipogrammatic contstraint.
  3. Repeat until end of selected text.

 

Some variations of the lipogram:

Rewrite using only one vowel, creating a univocalic text.

The beautiful in-law, a letter in which the letters of an addressee’s name is successively excluded from the writing.

The beautiful out-law, a piece of writing in which each line or sentence must use all letters of the alphabet.

Left- or right-handed lipogram, a piece of writing that uses only letters on the left- or right-hand side of the keyboard.

Liponym: Working with a passage of your own text, rewrite the passage without one or more words—the, a, one, etc.

Working with a passage of your own text, rewrite your the passage using only one-syllable words. (See The Pilgrim’s Progress in Words of One Syllable by Mary Godolphin.)

The prisoner’s constraint. (It’s also called the “macao” constraint, but I don’t know why). This is a lipogram that excludes letters with legs (i.e., b, d, f, g, h, j, k, l, p, q, t, and y).

 

The Anagrammatical Text Exercise

Anagrammatical text.  Working with one key sentence from a source text—your own or another source—create a series of lines or sentences made exclusively of anagrams from that text.

Example: “Form is an extension of content” becomes “A Nonexistence Fits Front Mono.”

Here is an online anagram generator.

 

The Métro Poem

This is a poem composed in the métro, during the duration of a trip. Here are the guidelines; I would imagine these are adaptable for your local public transportation system:

A métro poem has as many verses as your trip has stations, minus one.

The first verse is composed in your head between the two first stations of your trip (counting the station from which you departed).

It is transcribed onto paper when the train stops at the second station.

The second verse is composed in your head between the second and third stations of your trip.

It is transcribed onto paper when the train stops at the third station. And so forth.

One must not transcribe when the train is in motion.

One must not compose when the train is stopped.

The last verse of the poem is transcribed on the platform of your last station.

If your trip involves one or more changes of subway lines, the poem will have two or more stanzas.


Comments Off

Filed under Revision Techniques, Writing Prompts

Opening Sentences

If I ever have kids, _____

 

There are two kinds of people in this world: ______________.

 

Consider this: ________.

 

Here’s a fact: ________.

 

I keep forgetting ________.

 

The topic of ________ has always meant ________ to most people.  To me, though, it’s meant ________.

 

The day/night I lost my virginity/heard my first Beatles song/learned to skip, ________.

 

Let’s get this out of the way: ________.

 

If there is one thing I know from ________, it is this: ________.

 

________ sucks.

 

Yesterday I had a conversation with X. about _________ .

 

I’ve always _______.  Ever since ____, I ____.

 

Names are ______. Or maybe ______.

 

 

 

Comments Off

Filed under Revision Techniques, Writing Prompts

Coming to a Reckoning: A Way to Write a Solid, Substantial Academic Paragraph

Here is writing exercise, take-home or in-class, focused or free-write, to help writers practice textual incorporation (and think about the relationship between incorporation and interpretation).

    1. Pick a passage from a reading that speaks to you, haunts you, finds itself stuck in your memory. Pick the passage you wish you had selected but didn’t. Let it be lengthy (4-5 sentences or longer).
    2. Paraphrase it; put it in your own words. In “Name of Article,” X. writes that ___ .
    3. Now, condense your paraphrase into one sentence that starts with the phrase “In other words…, “” One could say that,” “[Name of author]‘s idea is that.”  See what happens.
    4. From here, start a sentence that helps you link the work above with the ideas you’ve been starting to hatch on your own. Try “This helps me see that..” or “This might mean that…”

      You might focus on what you now see your author values, or what her motive is for writing in the first place. You might focus on what interests you or compelled you to select this passage in the first place. You might focus on what your author’s ideas help you see/say about some of the themes you’ve identified as important/intriguing thus far.

    5. Next, adopt a contrarian stance. Disagree with yourself, or rather your interpretation/summary.  Use “However,” “But” or “On the other hand…” or “It might be the case that ___” or “When we say this, we might overlook _____.
    6. Finally, come to a tentative resolution or a question. Start a sentence with “Perhaps…” or “The question is worth raising because,” “On balance,” or “What it all comes down to is.”
    7. See where you end up.

Bonus: Use direct quote inside one of your own sentences. Set up the quote beforehand, and explain on why the term/quote matters or implies.

You’ll see that you now have a substantial paragraph, with a word count of anything from 150-300 words or more. The excerpt from your chosen text does not merely float there; you have been to think about it and reflect on it and interact with it. Think about how you might use this in all the modes of your writing: from academic articles, to experimental forms and creative writing, down to emails to your friends.

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Essay Writing, Handouts, Writing Prompts

The PowerPoint Karaoke Improvisation Assignment

[under construction]

In another assignment, we will be putting together a pecha-kucha PowerPoint presentation of our own. In this assignment you will be improvising a talk, an essayistic talk, using slides provided by your fellow classmates.

Improvisation and chance have deep roots in all of the arts, and the essay is no exception.

Situationsists address this in part  “Theory of the Dérive.”

Steve Benson‘s improvised talks/poemsCarolee Schneemann (1, 2),

Comments Off

Filed under Writing Prompts

The Pecha Kucha Presentation Assignment

What is Pecha Kucha?

[What follows is adapted from the official Pecha Kucha site.]

Pecha Kucha, which gets its name from the Japanese onomatopoetic word for “chit chat,” is a simple presentation format where you show 20 images, each for 20 seconds. The images advance automatically and you talk along to the images. Astrid Klein and Mark Dytham of Klein Dytham architecture created the format, and the first PechaKucha Night was held in Tokyo in their gallery/lounge/bar/club/creative kitchen, SuperDeluxe, in February 2003. It’s a format that makes presentations concise, and keeps things moving at a rapid pace.

The Assignment

Edward R. Tufte send-up of “the dreaded build sequence” in PowerPoint.

Make and present your own pecha kucha and share it with the class.

You will do this presentation at least twice–once in front of the class, and once to record the presentation and upload online.

What will your pecha kucha be about? Talk about one of your projects, an idea, an epiphany you once had, or interests you had or still have–things you make, creative work, obsessions.

The Format and Specifications

Some of these rules are straight fro the book Pecha Kucha Night, while others are clarifications specific to this assignment.

  • Use 20 slides that change every 20 seconds automatically.
  • No title slide. You will introduce yourself and your talk on the first slide. Use your first name and last initial (for privacy, since it’s going to be online).
  • Use images that complement, support, or even distract us from what you are saying or contradicts your points (that last one is used often for humor) in your oral presentation.
  • Each slide image should be 1024 x 768 pixel jpegs.
  • As the original rules say, “no pie charts,” and no “dreaded build sequences” (see art on right).
  • One image per slide. No split-screen with two images, four-screen with four, etc.
  • No corporate logos and no advertising or long-winded manifestos.
  • No text overlaid on or typed under any of your slides; if your image has text on it, that’s fine, but nothing you put on after the fact.
  • No fancy dissolves from slide to slide.
  • No animation.
  • No embedded background music or sound effects.

You can use PowerPoint or Keynote (the latter if you have your own laptop to run it from). There are templates with the slides pre-timed online. Here is a pecha kucha template in PowerPoint. Here is a link to templates in PowerPoint and Keynote for Apple.

Background and Examples

Here is an overview of pecha kucha and its descendants; here’s another. Another video; and another. ”Are you ready for PowerPoint Karaoke?” from Boston Globe An article on Pecha Kucha on The ListOne article from Wired magazine; here’s another.

YouTube has many examples; just search for “pecha kucha.” There have been PK nights in nearby Pittsfield, MA; here’s one. There are many great examples on the official Pecha Kucha site. Here’s one. Ones on Walter BenjaminTESOLHenri Cartier-Bressonletterpress printingpipes, and IdeaTree Design; ones by Dr. Gonzo,  Renato OraraPeter Huboi.

Pointers and Tips

  • Create some of your images yourself. Use line drawings, take photos, draw from your archives. I can help you scan them.
  • Use a logical or illogical sequence, but do either with intent.
  • These two posts offer lots of great tips, among them: build in catch-up spots, have extra sentences that can be cut if you’re going too slow, give yourself places to breathe, and give your presentation a narrative arc.
  • Because of the pecha-kucha format, thankfully, you won’t be able to employ many of the usual PowerPoint cliches–the one-point-at-a-time sequence (again, at right) or the over-complicated “Death by PowerPoint”-type slide. Either way, be conscious of the limitations and the objections over of the PowerPoint form.

Readings, Critical Frameworks

Edward R. Tufte’s essay on PowerPoint; David Byrne’s essay;

I like this quote: “a good PowerPoint presentation (and such things do exist) should be pretty much incomprehensible to anybody seeing only the slides and not listening to what the presenter is saying. (Of course, there are always exceptions.)” Also: “Life after Death by PowerPoint” video, second one.

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Writing Prompts

Make Your Own Notes on “Camp” Assignment

First page of Sontag’s “Notes on “Camp.”"

“A sensibility (as distinct from an idea) is one of the hardest things to talk about”–Susan Sontag

This writing assignment centers on imitating and trying to employ many of the same techniques from Susan Sontag’s essay “Notes on ‘Camp,”" published in 1964 in Partisan Review and collected in her first book of essays, Against Interpretation. In the essay, composed of 58 numbered sections or notes, Sontag sets out to come to a working definition of the sensibility known as “camp.” Whether Sontag succeeds or fails in her work is besides the point; the point is that she explores her topic using a paratactic and nonhierarchical arrangement of quotations, fragments, comparisons, asides, aphorisms, lists, imagined scenarios and variations.

Your assignment: Make your own “Notes on ‘Camp.’

First, select a term. A word. Slang works. For best results, make it attached to sensibility, aesthetic, artistic movement, or even something that defies definition.This can be something you’ve coin for the purpose of this essay, or a term known to the general public.

Title Your Essay “Notes on ‘_____.’”

Next, write a series of numbered “notes.” For purposes of your first draft, try to hit the magic number Sontag hits: 58.

Try to write your own version of each and every note.

Here’s a partial breakdown of your notes.

Cluster your notes. Some of these notes might work as standalone sections, but try to build on and offer a progression in your sections.  In Sontag’s essay, she clusters them like so: 1-6; 7-17; 18-22; 23-33; 34-44; 45-49; 50-53; 54-58. Notice how some clusters of notes are larger than others; notice, too, that the epigraph that begins each cluster prefaces or gives a hint of what is to come.

– Research. Look up your idea

Prompts that Imitate Specific Sections of Sontag’s Essay 

– Use at least six, standalone quotes as epigraphs. Draw from a variety of sources. Sontag quotes from a book of manners, a novel, and one from a “conversation” (optional).

– Start slow (#1).

– What versions of your Term are there (#3).

– Include one list of examples of your Term. Sontag has 14 items in her list in note #4. Try for that on your first draft.

– If your Term were a person, how would it act (#9)?

– Define the opposite of your Term. Give at least one example.

– Subdivide. Distinguish between types of your Term (#18).

– Define what is the ultimate example or apotheosis (or “hallmark”) of your term (#11, #25).

– What comes close to exemplifying your Term, but still does not (#27)?

– Do not limit yourself to one time period. Access other time periods for examples of your Term (#13, #33).

– Variations of your Term. What is a “lite,” or watered-down, version of your Term? A bastardized version? A parody, or exaggerated version, of your Term?

– Are there dirty or crude versions of your Term (#17)?

– Why would someone like your Term (#42)?

– What does your Term do, or “propose” (#44)? How does it affect how one see the world?

– Who almost embodies your Term (#47)?

– Class and money (#50).

– Sexuality (#51).

– How does one best experience your Term (#54-55).

 

Other Writing Prompts that Might work for Sections

Tell a story.

Investigate the etymology of your word.

Look up peer-reviewed articles that relate to your term and wrote about some of them.

Thirteen Ways of Looking at X (would take some adapting, but it might work)

Writing Prompt: Write a Sestina Version of your Writing (write it in prose)

Write a list using anaphora.

Use one or more of these opening sentences. Some more.

Although it may take some reading, some of the writing prompts inside this assignment would definitely work.

A long sentence that riffs on your word would work.

Use an oblique strategy.

Readings:

Sontag, Susan. “Notes on ‘Camp.’ Against Interpretation.

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, English311Fall2012, Writing Prompts

The Personal Definition Essay Assignment

Diagram from the essay "Printing" in...

Image via Wikipedia

The assignment is to write an essay (4-5 pages) that introduces, develops, explores, and ultimately, informs and outlines an argument for your personal definition of a term.

Elements of this Essay
The goal of an essay that defines a term, according to The Sundance Reader, is to “inform or persuade” an audience. Your audience for this essay is this class, both classmates and instructor, as well as the general reader (i.e., the world).  To fulfill this assignment, you must use support and illustrate your point with specific details.  Use readings, research, personal evidence, and statistics to inform or persuade readers to accept or understand your point of view.

To excel at this assignment, your essay’s definition should come from a distinct, single idea, a personal definition, that is yours.

The key word in personal definition is personal–you’re not, for example, attempting to define a word like “infidelity” on behalf of a whole country, a religion, or according to a law.  It’s your personal definition.

How do you define something?  That’s a good question.

If you start with just your own imitation at a dictionary definition, or try to mimic something such as legislation or criminal law, chances are you’re going to run into some trouble.  These elements turn up in personal definition essays, but more often than not these are used in service to the writer’s personal definition–either as a supporting point, color detail, or as a rhetorical foil. It may seem like you are saving time, but it will just pigeon-hole your thinking and writing.

A better place to start, and a good way to test if your topic or word would work for this kind of essay, is to write about the denotative and connotative definitions of your word. Denotative is the dictionary definition, the literal sense of a word; connotation is its figurative meaning or images or associations it might have outside its literary meaning, depending on its context and how it’s being expressed.  Words like home, date, crazy, message, disrespect, child, tree, all have denotative meanings, but also connote other meanings as well. Many words also take on a kind of mythical importance among certain groups, an idea advanced in the field of semiotics.

The narrative strategy.
As an exercise, you could try tell us a story, a specific story, that uses your word/term.  Then try to define it.   Tell another story, maybe someone else’s.  Then define it again and change it a little bit.  And so on, and so on.  Try to tell 3-4 stories that use the word and define the word at the end.  Sounds like a fairy tale with a moral, I know.  But it works.  All we have is our stories.

Compare/contrast. Find a word that is similar and explore the differences and distrintions between the two—not just denotatively, but connotatively. Look at other people’s definitions and contrast them with your own: How do experts in the field define your term? That’s a good start.  In your homework, you asked other people their experience with a term.

Defining the opposite. Another strategy might be called negation; in other words, what is your term not?

A definition essay shares your special understanding about some idea or thing. Sometimes a definition will prove to be a small but important part of an essay; sometimes a definition will be the sole work of an entire essay. When it’s the major impetus of an essay, there are several points to remember.

In selecting a topic to define, look for something that you can define within your own experience and that will allow your poetic imagination some room to play. It might be a big mistake for your English instructor to define reggae or rap music, but there are many students who could do a great job. If you try to define something that is beyond the comprehension of your paper or your own experience, the task will become overwhelming and get mired down in details or abstractions. You could write a book trying to define a concept such as conservatism or liberalism and you still wouldn’t have said anything that more than two other people would agree with. Students would be wise to avoid abstract notions such as patriotism, beauty, justice, love, or being a good sport.

Links to read before starting this assignment:

Developing a Definition

Definition Essay

Writing Definitions, from Purdue’s Online Writing Lab (OWL)

Research. No matter which strategies you adopt, you will have to support some of your claims with research. This can draw from scholarly or general readership publications, images from popular culture, or original interviews with other people. Cite these in your essay.

Deadlines
Rough Draft:
Workshops:
Final Draft:

Comments Off

Filed under English105Fall2012, Essay Writing, Handouts, Writing Prompts

Four Essay Outlines

Outline 1: The Persuasive Essay with Narrative Brackets

Narrative lede/story, outside of the world of your essay, that is emblematic of, a metaphor for, or tries to illustrate, your Main Idea.

Transition into Main Idea (proposition/thesis)àthesis, outline of support/exploration/Subtopics 1/2/3

Subtopic 1: Most obvious point, or easiest to make, but not the strongest illustration.

Subtopic 2: Your weakest or most speculative point would go here.

Opposite/Contrasting viewpoint/point of view: Would it be so bad if what you are exploring or supporting wasn’t the case?

Subtopic 3: Your best evidence/support, the most compelling story.

Back to Narrative lede/story, re-addressing with Main Idea in mind.  Why would others think what you are talking about might be important?

Outline 2: The Cold Open

The Cold Open: Statement of fact; A description of a situation as it stands now, and what it threatens to be unless something—mindset, policy, reading of art—changes.  This could be a narrative, and it could be personal, but usually only if the writer is a main player in the situation (policy maker, politician, correspondent).

Transition into Main Idea (proposition/thesis)àthis is you solution/alternate method/another way of looking at the world (art/politics/religion/morals/technology).  Why might/should/would others think what you are addressing is important? Outline your support/exploration/Subtopics 1/2/3

Restate the problem, the “consequences” if things stay the way they are.

Subtopic 1: Restate your most obvious point, or easiest to make, but not the strongest illustration

Subtopic 2: Perhaps your weakest would go here

Opposite/Contrasting viewpoint/point of view: Would it be so bad if what you are exploring or supporting wasn’t the case?

Subtopic 3: Your best evidence/support, the most compelling story.

Back to your Cold Open.  How can we look at things differently or change the status quo?  What’s the first step toward changing our mindset?  Narrative lede/story, re-addressing with Main Idea in mind.

Outline 3: The Socratic Soft Sell

Tell us your topic or problem: I would like to talk about __________ . Why is it a timely subject?  Talk about a recent news story or recent phenomenon many of us have experienced, and perhaps you experienced first-hand.

The Maybe Paragraph.  Ask a series of questions to your reader; this narrows down what you are talking about and tries to introduce the heart of the matter.  What are we really talking about?  Why might this be important?  Do we need to change our way of thinking?  See our world differently?  Slowly transition into Main Idea by saying “Perhaps what we are really talking about is __________. Outline your explanation/exploration in Subtopics 1/2/3

Subtopic 1: Restate again why this General Topic and your Reshifting of the Discussion is timely.  Tell us what might be at stake or how some readers might benefit.

Subtopic 2: Using examples and evidence, try to answer your questions in the Maybe Paragraph—not definitely, but with the idea of one solution or answer may be found in _______.

Subtopic 3: Sell your idea here a little bit harder.  What if We Don’t Ask these Questions: What will happen?  What are the consequences of leaving this topic unexamined?

Subtopic 3: Your best evidence/support, the most compelling story.

Back to your Cold Open.  How can we look at things differently or change the status quo?  What’s the first step toward changing our mindset?  Narrative lede/story, re-addressing with Main Idea in mind.

Outline 4: The Story of Your Idea

In a narrative lede/story, tell us how your idea or position has changed—tell readers your Before-and-After story: what you thought about a particular topic/idea/problem before you went about your process of writing this essay and investigating, and what you think now, and why.  The change of position does not need to be a complete 180-degree turn; mostly, these essays describe the degree, however small, your outlook has changed.

Subtopic 1: The Before Picture.  Tell us why you had this Before position, place in context personally, critically, or both.

Subtopic 2: The Epiphany.  What happened to make you change your mind?  Try to pinpoint a particular experience, text, idea, realization that made you change your idea.  Tell us the story of this change.

The Soft Sell/Opposing Argument.  Tell us why it might fruitful for others to go down the same road of critical inquiry and investigation that you have gone down.

Subtopic 3: The After Picture.  Tell us why others might want to consider shifting to the ger.

Back to before you changed your position.  How has your outlook changed from that moment?

Back to your Narrative Lede/Story.  Tell us some added detail, some parting detail of your critical inquiry with this topic/problem/issue.  Why does this matter?  Why might we care?

Comments Off

Filed under Essay Writing, Handouts, Writing Prompts

Ridiculous Persuasive Argument Paper Assignments

How Wearing “Scrunchies” Help The Environment
We Can Put A Man On The Moon, But Why Can’t We Make Killer Robot Police?
Alf and Saved By The Bell: The Greatest TV Shows of All Time
Why Apple is Catholic and PCs are Protestant
Why is That? White Shirt Republican, Denim Shirt Democrat
How a Single Paperclip Can Bring Peace in the Middle East
My Parents are Aliens But I Am Not: Some Theories Why This is So
How Casual Fridays are Promoting Adulterous Office Affairs
Global Warming: The Advantages of the Melting Ice Cap
The Fat Guy and the Thin Guy in Cartoons and Comic Film
How My Career in Little League Baseball or Softball Parallels Today’s Political Climate
Why Ben and Jerry’s Should Name An Ice Cream Treat After Me
Why No One Should be Annoyed With Forwarded Junk Emails
Uniforms in High School: Why Everyone Should Just Wear a Plain, Grey Jumpsuit
Why Humans Should Be Classified as Amphibians
How the VW Beetle was a Nazi Propaganda Tool
Why Paris Hilton Should Get a PhD in Elementary Education
The Neon License Plate and Cruising: A Sexual Investigation
How Sean Penn Can Single-handedly Save The Ozone Layer
Post-It Notes Are Living Organisms, Too
The Little Man Inside Your Refrigerator Needs More Exercise
Why Dry Erase Boards Cause Vertigo
How We Can Better Communicate With Bacteria
Guns Kill Other Guns: Did You Know?
I am a Fish
I am a Lizard
I am a Four-Legged Mammal
Is Oprah Winfrey a Robot?  Some Proof
Proof that Judge Judy is a Problem Drinker
Wearing Baseball Caps: Do They Lower Your Intelligence?
Why Long Island Should Secede from the Union and Become Its Own Country
The Port Authority: Things I Know Not to Do
Everything I Know About Fashion I Learned from Kim Il Jong
How Fritos Can Be Used to Build Environmentally Friendly Homes
Why My Plans for World Domination Should be Supported
Deforestation: On the Advantages of a Tree-less World
Can prosody create a utopian American by forcing the language of bills, laws and judicial decisions to conform to metrical regularity and rhyme?
The Benefits of Banning Human Procreation for the Next 12 Years

Comments Off

Filed under Writing Prompts

The “My Turn” Newsweek Narrative Argument Assignment

The purpose of this assignment is to write a narrative argument with a general readership appeal.

The guidelines presented by Newsweek are that the essay should be: a) An original piece, b) 850-900 words, c), Pasted into the body of your email, d) Personal in tone, and e) About any topic, but not framed as a response to a Newsweek story or another My Turn essay.

Think about the samples: what do they have in common? What are the broad themes the authors are trying to address in their narratives? Are they successful? What do you like about the narratives? What do you dislike? Using the characteristics of a narrative essay presented in class, create your own version of a “My Turn” narrative.

Comments Off

Filed under Writing Prompts

Writing Prompt: The Specific Object

“The essay presupposes an independent observer, a specific object, and a sympathetic reader.”– Graham Good, “The Essay as Genre” in: The Observing Self: Rediscovering the Essay

Think of your own “specific object”; this can be an idea, an obsession, a bee in your bonnet, a story that sticks with you, an embarrassment, neurosis, even a physical object.

Think of a question you would like to pose raise about this specific object.

Ask it.  Write it down.

Try to answer it. Write it down.

Second-guess yourself. Write it down.

Clarify yourself. Write it down.

Go out and find what others have said/written/sung/filmed/danced/mimed about your specific object.  Find at least three you will mention/quote, at least three you will not.

Interview someone about your specific object.

When was the last time the subject of this specific object came up in your daily life?  Write it down.

Imagine a sympathetic reader.  Give this person a name: You/one.

What might this sympathetic reader think of your specific object? Write it down.

What is the opposite/antithesis/absence of your specific object? Write it down.

Comments Off

Filed under Writing Prompts

Writing Prompt: The Weekly World News Title

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

They say the truth is sometimes stranger than fiction.  The same would apply, I would say, for made-up news stories posing as truthful ones, such as ones found in supermarket tabloids.  Some of these publications, such as People and Us, strive for some sort of respectability. Others, most notably Weekly World News, worked a far more bizarre route, publishing un-fact-checkable stories that tug on our most bizarre heart strings. That’s why it was so awesome.

Directions:

1. Select a title of a “news” story from Weekly World News. You can do this by running an internet image search, or using some compiled by your instructor, or go through the slide show above.

2.  Write a short paragraph about a real-life event that is inspired by, but does not make reference to, the Weekly World News headline.  If the story is called “Aliens Abduct Hillary Clinton,” in other words, perhaps the headline would be a way for you to begin writing about a recent time you were watching news coverage or having a heated political discussion with a relative or friend.

3.  Try to do more than one and make an entire essay made up of subtitles of “strange-but-true” stories.

Adapted from:

Nissen, Thisbe. “Fiction Through Artifacts.” Naming the World: And Other Exercises for the Creative Writer. Bret Anthony Johnston, Editor. New York: Random House, 2007.

Comments Off

Filed under Writing Prompts

Writing Prompt: Suggested Titles

Guests May Not Download Programs Onto Our Computers

They Give Hurricanes Such Pretty Names

I Should Have Told You The Following Before We Kissed:

The Happy Fun of Love

It’s Nice to See Tigers Do This

The Baron Gives an Amused Snort

Tuesday And I’m In My Horrible Chair
Seymour: The Abbreviated Introduction

Oh, Temp Pool Love

Excerpts from Me! The Musical

The Buddha Fired Me

If I Told You Once

We Are All Just Bullets. I Mean This.

Reflections on Jessica Simpson’s Shoes

Kangaroos on a Plane

The Pat Sajak Lecture Series: Excerpts

Amateurish in the Best Sense

Regrets of an Impresario

Focus on Sainty

What I’m Working Into My Memorial Service

My Royal Name is Sir/Lady (pick one) Chatterlittle

To the people who hold to such dismissive claims

Why isn’t it all a waste of time?

Puppies and Flowers

To My Successor at (Your Employer Name Here)

A Detailed Description of My Disco Obsession

10 Perfect Questions for (Celebrity/Public Figure Name Here)

Valedictory for My High School Reunion

Notes on the [Guy/Gal] at Stewart’s

Where My Books Go After I Read Them

Wishes for His Supposed Mistress

In a Kayak, Thinking

Love is a Sickness Pepto Bismol Cannot Cure

Meet We no Angels, Pansy?

Mother, I cannot mind my Wheel

Albanyian Rhapsody

My Delight Might Not Be Your Delight

Five Long Sentences That Have Haunted Me Since I Read Them, and When I Did Read Them I Had to Take a Couple Minutes to Get it Together, and Then I Wrote Them All Down

Comments Off

Filed under Writing Prompts

Writing Prompt: Suggested First Sentences

I never told anyone _____________.

I never told anyone, but I’ll tell you _____________.

[Dorothy Allison]

The last time I saw her she was wearing a fake moustache.

[Denise Duhamel]

While it may be true that artistic pursuits contribute little to the material welfare of a any given culture, art is vital to any society with the capacity to be bored.

If there’s one thing I’ve learned from my parents it’s this: All futures become old school.

[Peter Davis]

I’ve spent my whole life trying to figure out how to walk down a street with a black man

and not notice that he’s black.

[Matthew Lippman]

“Public servants” pretend they are not, first and foremost, ambitious.

[Jeffrey Morgan]

Only after the rain ended did he smell the peaches.

[Michael Schiavo]

I know he meant to say tangential, but he kept right on saying tangenital.

I’m not saying I’m proud, but I did win an award for that once.

[Kim S. Clune]

All I really remember in those first few minutes was his initial response, which went something like “What do you mean you dropped it? It’s seventy-fucking-one stories, Larry. Seventy one. Now what the fuck are we gonna do? Huh? You asshole.”

[Henry Singer]

I’ve been meaning to tell you this, but you look like a monkey.

The chicanery needed to stop, before any one got hurt.

[Mark Hamilton]

There is a miniature pump doctors call the Berlin Heart.

A little over two weeks ago my Jess looked out the window and then she turned and ran for the door yelling: something’s wrong with Mattie!

[Todd Colby]

The gourd was hardly engorged, but rather wilted and withered.

[Jenny Boully]

The horizon, however flat it may appear from where humans usually stand, is actually the outer edge of a vertiginous spheroid, and therefore almost unbearably round.

This essay deals with the history of turnips.

By now the notion that boiled eggs are tasty is something of a commonplace.

Among the many threats to America’s economic stability, some of which are quite serious, I need to pay my babysitter with something other than loose change.

Where has all the old-fashioned bric-a-brac gone?

[Aaron Belz]

Summertime rested like a nap just on the other side of May.

I’ve got a few hard things to tell myself about myself.

Just because something is as big as a house does not make it a house.

[Shafer Hall]

There is ten things I am going to delve through.

[Jonah Winter]

Comments Off

Filed under Writing Prompts

The Encyclopedia of an Ordinary Life Assignment

The following assignment is inspired by and adapted from Encyclopedia of an Ordinary Life, the critically acclaimed 2004 book by Amy Krouse Rosenthal.

In her book, Rosenthal writes 200-plus pages of entries, written encyclopedia-style, for words and terms involved in her life: people, ideas, items and objects, anecdotes, her own definitions of words, obsessions.  Some examples from the book appear at the end of this handout. Writing style-wise, part of her inspiration comes from reading other writers—from ancient China on to modern times—who wrote in essays that didn’t necessarily weave points seamlessly from one to another, and instead wrote in separate, discrete entries, or an alphabetical format similar to her own.

Your assignment is to write a mini-encyclopedia of your own by writing at least one encyclopedia entry for each of the 26 letters of the alphabet, plus two numbers. These entries can be definitions, short-short stories, zany asides.  Provide at three visual elements: illustration, chart, photo, sketch. Cross-reference at least three entries to each other. The entries can be anywhere from 5-500 words each.  The total word count for the assignment should be 3,000 words minimum.

Some ideas for entries? A favorite (or hated) word, a family name, an artist you love, or idea or concept that is directly related to your own experience.  Perhaps something that triggers a memory from your life.  Movies, books, comics, magazines, celebrities, are all fair game.  Writing is about memory, after all; it’s about chronicling your memory.

Some excerpts from Encyclopedia of an Ordinary Life are here.

Comments Off

Filed under Writing Prompts

The Manifesto Assignment

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

More information: What is a manifesto?

Manifesto—from the Latin manifestus meaning clear, “evident”—is defined by dictionary.com as a “public declaration of principles, policies, or intentions, especially of a political nature.”

The manifesto is usually a fairly grumpy document.  The impetus for writing a manifesto is an extreme dissatisfaction at the way things are, and by starting your movement—your “-ism”—you are saying you have a plan to fix it.

You may have heard of The Communist Manifesto, co-authored by Karl Marx in 1848.  The Declaration of Independence is also a manifesto of sorts.

There’s also a history of manifestoes in artistic and literary movements, and that’s where you come in.  Charles Olsen’s “Notes on Projective Verse” is a big, hulking manifesto—important, and a fairly unreadable one at that.  The Guerilla Girls, a collective of female artists manifesto flyer is the most recent example, and is thoroughly entertaining and in-your-face.

So get to making up your own movement, and be prepared to ‘declare publicly’!

Comments Off

Filed under Writing Prompts

The Aphorism Assignment

The word aphorism comes from the Greek ap-horeizen, which means to set a boundary or define a horizon. A good aphorism, writes, Mark Vernon, “is one that casts life in a different frame, changes our perspective, gets us to reconsider what we took to be true. Pithiness has a purpose: to force us to stop, to look, to think.”

More conventially defined, the aphorism is a brief saying that puts forth a statement, principle or precept on such topics as morals, aesthetics; its aim it to use as concise language as possible.

Steps:

– Familiarize yourself on the subject.  Read examples, both modern and through the ages.  The aphorism is one of the oldest genres in the world.  Part of the attraction of writing aphorisms is that one is addressing the ages, just just our own day.

– Choose a subject, a word, a noun, a concept; I recommend randomly picking one by flipping through the dictionary.

– Use/steal/ape the sentence construction of other aphorists.  There’s a reason why theirs worked.

– Write as many one- to, say, three-sentence aphorism on this subject as you can before your ideas are exhausted.  Then pick another.

– Edit these aphorism sessions down to at least 60 sentences.  Try to include the word/term/subject in all of them if you’re being strict with yourself.

– Put a number before each of them.  This is for reference, sure, but it’s also a nod to previous aphorist’s form and a conceit that your aphorisms are so good, so wise and profound, that references will be needed for further consultations.

– Depending on the context of the assignment, try to write 100 aphorisms.

Other ideas:

Group your aphorisms under a single theme.  These theme can be general, centering around a single idea. Alternately, you can group yours according to subject as well, although sometimes a random assortment of an aphorism collection works better.

Keep in mind your tone. Using high-minded, philosophical language–using general language and lofty goals–might have the opposite effect on readers, and will likely make them draw a blank in response to your aphoristic wisdom.  ”The difficulty with writing aphorisms,” Drew Byrne writes, “is that it’s old and dusty. So dusty, in fact, that most people involved in writing them think it’s something to do with a load of dead poets pontificating. This is a mistake. The only good aphorism isn’t necessarily poetic, an up-in-the-air, arty-farty affair. It’s necessarily an irritant. And if it can’t do that, in the modern age or in the past, it says nothing of meaning.”

Some examples:

Proverbs from the Old Testament of the Bible

Esquire magazine’s Rules for Men

Gracian’s Art of Worldly Wisdom

Ersasmus’ Adagia

Shit My Dad Says on Twitter

Oscar Wilde, “Phrases and Philosophies for the Use of the Young” (scroll down)

“69 Hidebound Opinions” by CD Wright.

The website for James Geary, author of The World in a Phrase, a study of the aphorism and aphorists.

The “wisdom literature” of everyone from Confucius to Robert Bly, adages, sayings, quotable quotes, haiku, and journal excerpts presented as stand-alone works.James Richardson’s work serves as nice examples of the modern aphorism (excerpts here).

Sun Tzu’s The Art of War (and here)

Marvin Bell’s “32 Statements About Writing Poetry”

Wallace Stevens’ “Adagia”

Voices (bilingual edition), by Antonio Porchia, translated by W. S. Merwyn.Copper Canyon Press, 2003.

The Agony of Flies: Notes and Notations (bilingual edition), by Elias Canetti,translated by H. F. Broch de Rothermann. Noonday Press, 1994.

All Gall Is Divided, by E. M. Cioran, translated by Richard Howard.ArcadePublishing, 1999.

George Murray. Glimpse: Selected Aphorisms. ECW Press, 2010.

Comments Off

Filed under Writing Prompts

54 Essay Writing Experiments

1. Epistolary essay. Write letters/emails to yourself. Write back. Repeat as needed.

2. Five-act 1. Tell a story five different ways, from five different perspectives, human and object.

3. Freytag’s Pyramid (Gustav Freytag, Lajos Egri). Write an essay divided into five parts, or acts: Exposition/Premise, Rising Action/Problem, Climax (Turning Point), Falling Action/False Resolution, Dénouement.

4. Captain’s Log (Todd Colby). Write diaristic account of workday, including exact time and place of writing.

5. Chronological Record of My Life (Amy Krouse Rosenthal). Write one sentence about yourself for each year you have lived.

6. Self-Google. Write only with resulting text, editing it down to an essay.

7. “How To” Oral History (Foxfire). Interview your oldest relative. Ask him or her to teach you how to do something: a skill that is no longer needed in our modern age, a cooking recipe, how to ask a girl/boy to a dance. Transcribe/edit using only your subject’s words.

8. Frequently Asked Questions. Write an essay by answering the Frequently Asked Questions of a random website. Take out the questions, or leave them in.

9. Cento Essay. Construct an essay entirely made up of full sentences other than your own. Cite sources at the end. Alternate: Construct essay entirely made up of sentences that are from your own past essays).

10. Recomination: Write a one-word sentence, then a two-word, a three-word, and so on.

11. Recomination 2: Start with a sentence that is one-word long, two-word, etc. Double word count in each successive sentence.

12. Make up your own outline. Write an essay according to that outline. Cut up the outline and throw on floor. Pick up. Use that order as your new outline. Cut and paste corresponding text.

13. Serial Sentences (Bernstein): Select one sentence each from a variety of different books or other sources. Use that to begin each paragraph, and sentences of your own composition. Combine into one paragraph or reorder to produce the most interesting results.

14. Deep listening (Sparrow, Barbara Louise Ungar, Joseph Bailey, et al.) Listen with eyes closed for 10 minutes. Offer account. Repeat as needed.

15. Lipogram 1. Write an essay with no adjectives or adverbs.

16. Lipogram 2 (George Perec). Write an essay that does not use one particular letter.

17. Liponym (Wayne Koestenbaum). Write an essay without one word (examples: the, a, I). Write an essay without one word that is about that word (example: an essay about apples without using the word apple or apples).

18. Univocalic Essay (Christian Bok’s Eunoia). Write an essay that uses only one vowel.

19. Journey Around My Room (Xavier De Maistre). From your bed, look slowly around your room, and write a full page of description (narrative, memory, lists) of at least five objects.

20. Time-Specific (Bernadette Mayer). Write a paragraph at the same exact time every day for an pre-determined assigned number of days.

21. Pictures at an Exhibition (Mussorgsky). Go to an image-filled friend or relative’s house and write a paragraph on each picture, as if scripting a guided tour at a museum. Adopt art criticism-speak as needed.

22. User’s Manual. Write step-by-step, numbered directions to something you have no idea what to do, or a piece of equipment you have no idea how to use. Provide illustrations as needed.

23. Recurring dream/confidence man. Provide a detailed account of a recurring dream. Do not mention that it is a recurring dream.

24. Write an essay with a font/typeface you never use.

25. I cannot/can’t remember (Brainard). Write a list of things you cannot remember from your own life. Provide details of what you cannot remember.

26. Write an essay on only one computer that is not your own.

27. Write an essay with only one hand.

28. Anti-narrative (Walter Benjamin’s Arcades Project). Write an essay that is an assemblage of quotations, observations, newspapers, and other published sources, arrange them in categories: some of the ones Benjamin uses are “Fashion,” “Boredom,” “Advertising,” “Prostitution,” and “Theory of Progress.”

29. Numerology. Adopt a numeric system for your essay. Examples: write 10 10-word essays, 20 20-word essays. Write an essay with only one-, two-, three-, or four-syllable words.

30. Star number essay. Write an essay that has the exact word count of star number, which is defined in Wikipedia as “a centered figurate number that represents a centered hexagram, such as the one that Chinese checkers is played on. The nth star number is given by the formula 6n(n – 1) + 1.” The first star numbers are: 1, 13, 37, 73, 121, 181, 253, 337, 433, 541, 661, 793, 937, 1093, 1261, 1441, 1633, 1837, 2053, 2281, 2521, 2773, 3037, 3313, 3601, 3901, 4213, 4537, 4873, 5221, 5581, 5953, 6337, 6733, 7141, 7561, 7993, 8437, 8893, 9361, 9841, 10333, 10837.

31. Prime number essay. Write an essay that has the exact word count of prime number. A number is prime if it is greater than 1 and has no positive divisors except 1 and itself. The first prime numbers are: 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79, 83, 89, 97, 101, 103, 107, 109, 113, 127, 131, 137, 139, 149, 151, 157, 163, 167, 173, 179, 181, 191, 193, 197, 199, 211, 223, 227, 229, 233, 239, 241, 251, 257, 263, 269, 271.

32. Write an essay that can only be hand-written—i.e., with symbols, pictures, collage—and distributed by scanning/Xeroxing.

33. Use terms from Gustavus Miller’s dream dictionary (online; Google the term), and provide your own examples or explanations.

34. Turing Test essay (Alan Turing). Submit yourself to a Turing Test, the first test for artificial intelligence in a computer, by writing your own answers to the various Turing Test questions found online (Google the term “Turing Test questions”).

35. Write your own Profession of Faith.

36. Architectural essay 1. Write an essay that is an architectural “event, by using, in some form or another, Bernard Tschumi’s six concepts for postmodern architecture: defamiliarization, mediated metropolitan shock, destructuring, superimposition, crossprogramming, event. From: Johnson-Eilola, Johndan. “From Space | Action | Movement: Understanding Composition as Architecture.” 5 April 2007.  http://people.clarkson.edu/~johndan/read/architecture/welcome.html target=”_blank”> http://people.clarkson.edu/~johndan/read/architecture/welcome.html

37. Architectural essay 1. Model an essay on webs, nests, burrows, tunnels made by animals.

38. Write an oral history of a week in your life, using interview transcriptions from five people other than yourself.

39. Pillow Book (Sei Shônagon, Murasaki Shikibu). Write a book of sayings, lists, quotations, opinions of others.

40. Fragments (Sappho). Write an essay with the conceit that it has been transcribed from a notebook in which only a fraction of the text is readable/transcribeable.

41. Collaborative Essay. Write an essay that is one word/sentence/paragraph at a time with collaborator(s).

42. Five-Paragraph Essay Writing Roulette. Using standard five-paragraph parallel structure, write five standard academic essays in groups of three or more. Each writer writes a five sentence first paragraph (thesis, support subpoint-1, support subpoint-2, support subpoint-3, conclusion), and passes it on to the writer to his or her right, repeating until finished.

43. Cut-Up Essay (Cage, Burroughs). Write an essay. Cut up into sentences/paragraphs. Throw on floor. Pick up. Re-edit essay according to this new order.

44. Flarf Essay (Sullivan, Degentesh). Type your topic/thesis/idea into Google. Copy and paste the text results into your word processing program, and use only this text for your essay, cutting as needed. Then re-write as needed. (Important: Do not tell anyone you used this method.)

45. Indeterminacy (Cage). Group writes topics, assigns to another writer or is randomly picked from a hat.

46. Indeterminacy 2 (John Cage, Lars Von Trier). Have someone else write your essay, with yourself as author of record.

47. Each writer writes a sentence that must be included in another student’s essay. It must make sense, and be used verbatim.

48. Find five words you have never used, and use them in the essay.

49. Walk to work: write a sentence at each corner.

50. Sampling: Find a phrase from another work of art. Repeat in various forms in text.

51. Scientific article outline #1

TITLE:
BACKGROUND:
AIM:
METHOD:
RESULTS:
CONCLUSION:

52. Scientific article outline #2

BACKGROUND:
MATERIALS & METHODS:
RESULTS:
FIGURE 1:
FIGURE 2:
FIGURE 3:
FIGURE 4:
TABLE 1:
TABLE 2:
DISCUSSION:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
REFERENCES:

53. Forced Epiphany. Think of problem: Pose question. Then, go somewhere outside. Take notes of your surrounding. Then, have an epiphany. Attempt to answer your question (“Maybe the answer to ____ is ____” or “Maybe the question is really _____”).

54. Aphorism Essay: Write 25 aphorism on your subject or idea.

Inspired, stolen, and sometimes adapted from:
Bernstein, Charles. “EXPERIMENTS.” 19 May 2008. http://writing.upenn.edu/bernstein/experiments.html.
Mayer, Bernadette. “Bernadette Mayer’s List of Journal Ideas”; “Bernadette Mayer’s Writing Experiments.” 19 May 2008. http://writing.upenn.edu/library/Mayer-Bernadette_Experiments.html.


1 Comment

Filed under Writing Prompts

Make Your Own White Album Assignment

We tell ourselves stories in order to live—Joan Didion
This writing assignment, in a nutshell, is to imitate the outline of Joan Didion’s landmark 1979 essay, “The White Album.” You do this writing a succession of shorter “mini-essays.” The trick is to write these in an order that is different than what will appear as your final version, then reassemble them. The result will be your own “White Album.”
First, pick a Time Period (from 12 months to 5 years) in which your life was at a crossroads, were about to experience a great change of place or mindset, or were otherwise experiencing some sort of transformation or self-definition.
For some, such as Joan Didion, it is a longer period, in which the outside world as well as her personal life was in a major upheaval. For a college freshman, it may be senior year of high school; for others, it might be the death of a child or when they came out of the closet as a gay or lesbian.
Write a series of short, “mini-essays” that focus on different parts of your Time Period. Make them 300-500 words each. Write them in this specific order as you move along. They are as follows.
1. A Day in The Life. Tell a story from your Time Period when you feel your life was changed in a significant way—this cannot be an “Official Day” (graduation, prom, sports event, wedding, funeral; you will get to that later). Give the exact calendar date, to the best of your recollection (day, month, year).
2. Yearbook Entry. Take out some sort of list or directory from your Time Period: your senior year high school yearbook, a Buddy List/friends from AIM/MySpace, your childhood street. Think of a way to randomly pick from this list: every other person, every 20th; 2, 4, 6, houses down from you on your street. Write down their names, any official information (address/AIM), and a paragraph or memory about them. If you do not remember a person, try to explain why he/she has not lasted in your memory.
3. Road Trip Story. Tell a story about a road trip you took during your Time Period. This can be anything from a field trip with the school, or a debauched trip to a resort.
4. Important Things List. A list of items—ideas, objects, posters, belongings, medicines, drinks or drugs, prescription or not—that were important to you in your Time Period.
5. Hit Parade. Find the top five songs on the charts from the week of either the Big Day or Day in The Life. List them, plus impressions of those songs that stick in your mind.
6. Official Day. Describe a major event in your life that was in fact formal or official—a prom, wedding, graduation day, funeral, acceptance or denial from college.
7. Home and The News. A description of your home during this Time Period: your family (all of the names, full), a description of your bedroom. Plus: describe stories or events using two forms of media from the Day in The Life. Try to use both a newspaper or magazine with TV or internet. Summarize the story and discuss how it might have related or directly related to your own situation.
8. Preparation for the Big Day/Day in The Life. Describe the days leading up to the Big Day or the Day in The Life. Tear away or cut out parts from those parts you have already written, if necessary.
9. Icon Story. Summarize and commentate on a story that was in the news—a specific figure in the culture—from your Time Period. Focus on one person, one event with that person if possible, and explain why you picked it; without, of course saying you “picked it.”
10. Friend. Tell a story from your Time Period about you and a friend, something you did that is memorable to you.
When you are finished writing all the sections, re-order your mini-essays. Don’t worry about writing any transitions, not yet at least. Here’s the order:
1. Introduction
2. A Day in The Life (1)
3. Home and The News (7)
4. Official Day (6)
5. Icon (9)
6. Friend (10)
7. Yearbook Entry (2)
8. Important Things List (4)
9. Hit Parade (5)
10. Road Trip Story (3)
11. Preparation for the Big Day/Day in The Life (8)
12. Conclusion
Write the Introduction and Conclusion (1, 12). Look at all these stories, how they are ordered. What can you say about yourself? What larger statement can you make about this scrapbook, this White Album of your life? Try writing about yourself in the third person, perhaps even in the present tense.
Here are  some writing prompts for your Introduction and Conclusion.
•The narrator of this story is like _____.
• This is the time of my life when _____.
• The actions here took place between _____ and _____ .
• I had a job/I did not have a job. I made _____ a year/hour.
• I had/did not have a girlfriend/boyfriend/wife/husband/partner.
• Most of my time was spent doing _____.
• What do I miss most of this time? _____ . What do I miss least? _____.
• This story shouldn’t be told because _____ . This story should be told _____ .
• Which actor/actress should play the narrator in this story? _____.
• What is the color of this story? _____ .
• What does this story smell like? _____.
• What section of the library does this story belong? _____.
• During the time of this story, I met the following famous people or important local figures: _____.
• I believed in God/I didn’t believe in God. I still believe in God/I don’t believe in God now/I still don’t believe in
God.
• The narrator of this story is like me in the following ways: _____.
• The narrator of this story is not like me in the following ways: _____.
• The headline on the front page of this life story’s newspaper read _____.
• What did I expect to happen in my life? _____ .
• What really happened? _____ .
• If I passed the narrator of this story on the street, I might have though to myself, ‘_____ .’
• What would I say to the narrator of this story? _____.
Remember: Writing these mini-essays out of order is the whole trick! For many writers, this is
one of the only way you can write an essay that is disjointed thoughts- and timeline-wise, that
reflects the disjointed states of mind we all have in certain times of our lives; one that, as
Montaigne or Creeley might say, gives a form or shape to our content.
Other tips.
Read Joan Didion’s essay before you start and keep it as your side as you write the sections.
Think of how you will tell your stories.
Make up titles for each section.
Do research.
Interview people from this time. Use other peoples’ words, sources, literary works.
A version of this assignment is included in Now Write! Nonfiction: Memoir, Journalism, and Creative Nonfiction Exercises from Today’s Best Writers and Teachers Edited by Sherry Ellis. Tarcher/Pengiun, 2010.

1 Comment

Filed under Writing Prompts

The Objective Correlative Modernism-Postmodernism Essay Assignment

Definition of Objective Correlative. From: M.H. Abrams, A Glossary of Literary Terms.


The Objective Correlative: An Overview

T.S. Eliot writes in his essay “Hamlet and His Problems” that the “only way of expressing emotion in the form of art is by finding an “objective correlative”; in other words, a set of objects, a situation, a chain of events which shall be the formula of that particular emotion; such that when the external facts, which must terminate in sensory experience, are given, the emotion is immediately evoked.”[1]

I love the idea of an Objective Correlative more for than its practical applications, if any, or whether or not it’s particularly relevant to Hamlet or understanding works of art.  To me, it offers a writer the opportunity to organize his or her ideas, to prioritize them, and to recognize that it is an emotion or representation of an emotion that we’re trying to get across in the first place.  The idea of the Objective Correlative sets out, Eliseo Vivas writes, to explain how a writer “organizes his sensibility through the act of expression.” Writing is not, to this writer, a directionless expression.  The idea of objectifying an emotion is not a new one; it is also largely unprovable or, better put, un-enactable.  Rather, the objective correlative is more of a philosophical stance by which, for our purposes, we can understand how an essay comes into being.

Where an Essay Like This Could Start

Let’s suppose, for the time being, that there are two starting points for an essay. The first point derives from an aspect of our own interior lives; let’s call these this emotions or feelings.  We write about a state of being—from William Hazlitt’s “On Hating,” to Virginia Woolf’s “On Being Ill,” to Philip Lopate’s “Against Joie de Vivre”—and center on specific emotions or feelings to bear this out.  Our exploration of feelings prompts us to seek out particular examples–objects, if you will. Or, as Eliot puts it, chains of events, people, objects, and creatures—to illustrate and question and “evoke” these ideas.  We could call this set of starting points our ideas for personal-autobiographical essays.

A second starting point draws directly from an object, or set of objects, work or works of art or artist, event or chain of events, or situation, which the essayist in turn questions, ponders, essays, and tries out new ideas on.  For an example of what we could call the critical or aesthetic essay, we can begin with popular culture riffs from Lester Bangs’ canonical rock criticism on Lou Reed and James Taylor. As American Movie Critics: An Anthology from the Silents Until Now (edited by Philip Lopate, The Library of America, 2007) bears out, so much great film criticism starts, obviously, with a review of a film, and expands to address a larger aesthetic or societal issue or some cultural Zeitgeist.  We can move on up the criticism-philosophy chain: Susan Sontag‘s reflections on Leni Riefenstahl, Charles Baudelaire’s reviews of the Paris Salons laid down the ground work for what would become Modernism.

The idea of the Objective Correlative, the very coining of it, comes out of Modernist project of, as Jürgen Habermas writes, “develop[ing] objective science, universal morality and law, and autonomous art according to their inner logic.” This assignment draws its inspiration and power from the reactions, both subtle and militant, of the postmodern with the modern.

The Assignment

First, find an Objective Correlative, your own “set of objects,” as your subject.  This can be the fruits from a life-long obsession, a literal object you carry around that correlates to a larger part of your being, or an event from your life that lingers in your memory.

There are a couple of modus operandi bubbling up from this assignment, ones that may or may not help you if they are explained and you may or may not want to think about.  One is that we are using one idea from Modernism—i.e., the objective correlative—and putting it through a series of Postmodern drills and techniques.  Another is that much of what Postmodernism draws from, as its name implies, is a reaction to and rejection of many of the traits of high modernism, and by essaying between these two ideas should come up with some decent writing or at least starting-off points.

Some examples of Objective Correlatives: A cultural phenomenon, product, work (TV show, painting, movie, recording, material thing, event in history, cultural trend or fad) that translates into a particular emotion for you.  Some more: an action (riding the bus) or memory that triggers the memory of a particular object, idea, notion or long-time theory you have had.

Second, write an essay that integrates the following Postmodern qualities, that puts your objective correlative through these Postmodern hoops.  You may write an essay that features the results of these prompts paragraph by paragraph, numbered point by numbered point; you are encouraged to try these prompts out and see which ones work for your essay.

Writing Prompt: Tell us about your Objective Correlative.  Is this a private or personal object, or is it a public or even famous one? Give us the history of your OC.

Writing Prompt: Is there an emblematic story you can tell us that illustrate how this Object correlates to an emotion or feeling on your part?  Can you think of a hypothetical story based in fact that might help us picture your Objective Correlative, perhaps a composite of real events?

Writing Prompt: Using your Objective Correlative as your guide, study your object intently.  Look at it from all angles—before, during, and after a “situation,” Eliot calls it; above, beneath, and inside a literal “set of objects.”  Write down your observations. Describe your object it as precisely as you can using no metaphor at all—employ Ezra Pound’s very Modernist dictum that “the natural object is always the adequate symbol” as your guide.

Some More Prompts that Might Help You

IDEA: Modernism “quotes,” even “samples,” low culture—think Mahler quoting German folk songs, Eliot using Alexandrine rhyming couplets in “The Wasteland,”  Postmodernism blurs the line between high and low culture, integrates and incorporates low culture elements into the main strand of the work, and thus blur the distinction entirely.

Writing Prompt: Find, posit, cite, high culture incarnations of your objective correlative and a low culture incarnation.  Write a passage in such a way that both are standing side by side, with no judgment on the quality of highness of lowness.

IDEA: Modernism, in many ways, is an extension of the notion of what Matthew Arnold calls “high seriousness.” Postmodernism, on the other hand, doesn’t take itself too seriously.

IDEA: Modernism promotes a criticism alongside writing and art.  It sees these as two autonomous entities.  Postmodernism often attempts to do both at the same time—art and criticism.  A postmodern work often engages in a theoretical discourse side by side with the exegesis of one’s subject.  In everyday parlance, it “goes meta” on itself, places the way the writer is addressing its subject into the work of art itself, be it the ways in which knowledge of subject is acquired (epistemological concerns) or the ways the writer addresses the very existence of the self and subject (ontological concerns).

Writing Prompt: After you examine your Objective Correlative from all direct angles—physically, historically, etymologically—address how it is you got to know this object (epistemology), and how it came into being (ontology), as well as what others think or might think of it (various critical schools of thought).

IDEA: Postmodernism employs pastiche—i.e., a mimicking other styles, other voices, other art forms even—and integrates into the main strand of the work.  This is done out of nostalgia or as an homage. as opposed to drawing attention to it.  This is not to be confused with “parody,” which uses often mimicry to ridicule/make fun of the style and voice.

Writing Prompts: Write in another’s voice, perhaps embodying the voice of a great thinker.  Write in a style not your own to illustrate or expand on idea of yours.  Provide illustrations, drawings, photos, tables.

IDEA: the Death of Subject/Death of the Author. This might be hard to implement consciously.  In broadest of strokes: One hallmark of Modernism is the notion of an artist’s distinct voice, and art as a distinct product of the self.  This Cult of the Genius reaches its apex only as a reaction to previous epochs, where the subjects of art goes outside the traditional subjects that supported artists—churches, political leaders, middle class patrons. Modernism, for its part, put into question that experience and style is unique and was a way to improve one’s self.  Postmodernism blurs the line between an art’s subject and everyday life, between genius and just being a regular person.  In other words, a Postmodernist upends the Modernist’s claim for—or importance of—a personal, individual style.

Writing Prompts: Give your draft to or switch computer seats with someone else.  Have them look at a paragraph of yours and assign them to write another paragraph. Google a term relevant to your essay and integrate a version of that text into your piece.  Employ OuLiPo techniques of text generation.

IDEA: Collage and montage. “Collage,” critic Gregory L. Ulmer writes, “is the single most revolutionary formal innovation in artistic representation to occur in our century.”

Why?  First there is the old breakdown of the relationship between or among the sign, signifier and signified. Meaning is put into question even when a word is swapped out with another.  Two, by using collage and montage, new and unexpected meanings are achieved.

Writing Prompts: Cut up your draft and re-assemble, submitting to the new order you have come up with. Translate and retranslate sections of your text or all of it, and use the new syntax and words. Write your essay in a segmented/collage/montage/mosaic fashion to allow separate sections to resonate as distinct units.

IDEA: Postmodernism often employs parataxis, or uses a paratactic strategy.  Grammatically and stylistically, it is the placing of elements—paragraphs, sentences, utterances, words—side by side without transitions, coordinating phrases or words. Or explanations.  In film, it’s used all the time with jump-cuts and split-screens.

IDEA: Disrupt reader’s expectations in temporality—i.e., time.  Time-dependent works—music pieces, poetry, some narrative texts such as drama—are broken down.

IDEAS: “All conceptual writing is allegorical writing,” writes Vanessa Place and Robert Fitterman in their book Notes on Conceptualisms. Symbolism  derives from an idea, whereas allegory builds to an idea. One could say, without too much controversy, that in modernism uses symbols, where images build or “coagulate.” Modernism produces objects, ‘well-wrought urns’ which, drawing from its goals of am autonomous, stand-alone work of art, demand study of the art-object itself. New Criticism, an adjunct to or byproduct of Modernism, doesn’t so much discount studying the history of the work-object or author as much as relegating it to a lesser, secondary endeavor than the study of the work inside its own world.

In postmodernist work, the materials—backstory, author’s life, history, cultural context–are not only as important as the work itself; it is part of it.  The postmodernist manipulates and/or appropriates its materials (random examples: Richard Prince’s Marlboro Man, Kenneth Goldsmith’s Soliloquy, Flarf poetry, redactive text projects, Jonathan Safran Foer’s Tree of Codes). It could be said that postmodern writing demands some foreknowledge regarding that which is manipulated and what is the significance, implications or otherwise thought-out-ed-ness of said appropriation/manipulation. This depends in no small part on what is allegorized or pastiched. In allegorical/conceptual/postmodern writing, Place/Fitterman write, images are “jettisoned,” the writing is “necessarily inconsistent, containing elaborations, recursions, sub-metaphors, fictive conceits, projections, and guisings that combine/recombine both to create the allegorical whole.” The complete postmodern work is necessarily incomplete or at least incomplete-looking.

Writing prompts: Ban all use of symbols. Stop alluding to; rather,determine what is being allegorized, then  ’manipulate/break up/introduce fictive conceit’ your text-essay away from that which is allegorized. In other words, don’t tell people what you’re talking about or mean; rather, historicize (pastiche, polyvocal technique), fragment (numerology, chance, cut-ups) and otherwise interrogate your subect. Appropriate a text, manipulate/reconfigure it, and integrate it into your work.

Adapted from and inspired by:

Perelman, Bob.  “Parataxis and Narrative: The New Sentence in Theory and Practice.” American Literature 65(2): 1993, 313-324.

Jameson, Fredric.  “Postmodernism and Consumer Society.” In: The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture.  Hal Foster, ed.  Seattle, WA: Bay Press, 1983.

Ulmer, Gregory L. “The Object of Post-Criticism.” In: The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture.  Hal Foster, ed.  Seattle, WA: Bay Press, 1983.


[1] A sidebar: Eliot was not the first person to coin the phrase objective correlative, but he is certainly credited with making it popular.  The exact origin is subject to some debate in the critical literature, and variants of the term go back to Ralph Waldo Emerson, Byron, Husserl, Santayana, Nietzsche, and Walter Pater.  The painter Washington Allston seems to be the consensus choice first coiner in one of his lectures on art in the mid-19th Century, if not the first person to explain it the best.

1 Comment

Filed under Writing Prompts

The “I Remember” Writing Assignment (after Joe Brainard)

Flower Painting IV by Joe Brainard.

“I Remember” exercise.

This is the simplest and also the most powerful of all writing prompts.

It is this: write pages of sentences that begin with the phrase “I Remember.” This assignment is based on a book of the same name by Joe Brainard, an artist and writer, who collected his “I Remember”s in several editions, and are available in book form.

Some “I Remember”s are very short, others a paragraph long.

Information and excerpts from Joe Brainard

Short article on Brainard at The Academy of American Poets.

An excerpt from Frieze Magazine.

A couple more here.

Some audio recordings of readings by Joe Brainard at PennSound (scroll down for I Remember excerpts).

From ArtVoice, “Remember Brainard.”

A lesson plan from Teachers & Writers Collaborative based on the “I Remember” excercise.

Other writers’ Joe Brainard imitations and homages

D.W. Lichtenberg‘s “I Remember” piece.

Jon Emil Vincent‘s “I heart Joe Brainard, always will.”

Shane Allison‘s “I Remember, Joe.” Also his book called I Remember.

1 Comment

Filed under Writing Prompts

Ripped from the Headlines: A News Story Memoir Assignment

One might think that memoir is all about what’s going on in one person’s head–his or her memory, life, accomplishments–but it’s equally about the surrounding world, the search for connections, however tenuous or even illogical–to other people.  This assignment may seem simple and straightforward, but don’t be mistaken: it’s essential you include the outside world, outside objects and incidents; it’s essential you include other’s stories with the your own.

Take a current news story and fine your own angle or place in that story, either your place in the story or the story’s place or context in your own experience. Your job would be to find your own angle, your own story, to add to this story. Mention the story and the incident, but not academically so; the purpose of this assignment or strategy is to find your way into the world and vice versa.

Let’s say the story is a local one and involved an accident in a parking lot where a pedestrian was hit by a car.

First things first: Were you there? Do you know or know of the actors in the story? What are they like?

Can you tell another story that can add to our understanding of this one?

Has there been debates or controversy about speeding in the lot?

Have you yourself been pulled over by local police?

Is there a history or mythology to this parking lot?

How does car culture affect or not affect how people ride around the lot? Do people cruise around, showing off their wheels?

Does it remind you of your own high school parking lot?

Lastly and perhaps most importantly: Does this trigger any other memory that, on the surface at least, looks unrelated to this perhaps small-scale story, but will take efforts by you to explain?

1 Comment

Filed under Writing Prompts

Memoir Piece with Dialogue and Digression

As we read and then discuss Stephen Elliott’s The Adderall Diaries over the next couple of weeks, I thought it would be useful for us all to write a memoir piece.  Here are the specifications, we might call it, for your first assignment:

– No fewer than three and no more than five pages, double-spaced;

– Name the document correctly;

– Place in our shared Drop Box folder by September 5, 10am;

– The piece is memoir-based; that is to say, broadly, that you are writing from your own life; we’ll talk about the implications of memoir and the difference between memoir and, say, personal essay as the weeks go on.

– Don’t worry about having a beginning, middle, and and end.

– Include at least one exchange of quoted dialogue, with one of the speakers being you/the “I.” Working with dialogue on a mechanical and craft level is one of the things I’d like to talk about next week.  The following links here on this site should provide some help:

Working with dialogue and narration

Formatting dialogue: some links with tips

Writing a scene from the ground up

Dialogue in scenes: Some thoughts on format, what’s left out, and those pesky adverbs

– Include a least one digression that takes us out of the action; this can be an essay, rant, manifesto, flashback, tangent, musing (Judith Barrington, in your Readings folder), leap (Robert Bly); search for the word “tangent” over there on the right for some posts if you are stuck regarding where and what to write in your digression.

The most important thing is we start writing and we start talking about our writing with each other, all the while reading some great examples of our genres.  Email me if you have any questions.

1 Comment

Filed under Writing Prompts

The “Twenty Little Nonfiction Projects” Assignment

This assignment is inspired by the “Twenty Little Poetry Projects” exercise, invented by Jim Simmerman, and appears in The Practice of Poetry: Writing Exercises from Poets Who Teach, edited by Robin Behn and Chase Twitchell (HarperCollins, 1992. It’s a famous writing prompt project, as these things go, and many poets have tried their hand at it.  So many that there was an anthology of Twenty Little Poetry Project poems.

The only real “rule” Jim Simmerman sets in his explanation of the project is that you open the work with the first project and close with the last; otherwise, use the projects in whatever order you like.  Check them off as you move along, as in a scavenger hunt.  But do use all 20 projects.  Repeat some if you want.  Unless it makes sense for the piece, do not make a numbered list.  Instead, try to craft this into sentences, paragraphs, narration and dialogue.

  1. Begin by completing one of the following phrases: “This is about ______”; “This will be about ______”; “Tomorrow will be ______”; “They say that”; “Consider this: ______”
  2. Describe an event from the past in the present tense in 3-4 sentences.
  3. Use at least one image for each of the five senses, either in succession or scattered randomly throughout the writing.
  4. Offer commentary on the event in #2 in the past tense, again with three sentences; begin with: “Back then, I didn’t realize ______” or “We didn’t know that ______” or “I will later find out that ______.”
  5. Mention the name of a religion or faith other than the one you were brought up in, or your ancestors were brought up in, in one of the other sentences.
  6. Also: perhaps in another sentence, tell us how this religion or faith would address project #4.
  7. Use the proper name of a person and the proper name of place.
  8. Contradict what you say in #1 with a qualifier; try something like “Maybe this is really about ______”; “Perhaps tomorrow ______”; “Other people say that ______”; “Maybe what I’m really talking about ______” or “I also remember this: ______.”
  9. Make a statement about a recent advance in one of the hard or pure sciences (physics, computer science, geology, chemistry, biology) and make it relate it to one of your your other sentences.
  10. Use a word (slang?) that you never usually use in a sentence that makes sense in the context of another sentence or in another sentence entirely.
  11. Use an example of an ad hominem fallacy (an example: “That’s easy for me/you/her, him, them to say, because ______”).
  12. Create a composite character of two or more people (relatives, friends, co-workers, teachers).  Give that character a role in the essay.  Use a real name of one of the compositees, or assign another. He or she could appear or play a role in any part of the essay.
  13. Describe a childhood memory in three simple sentences (i.e., subject-verb-object).
  14. WWJDS? WWSFDS? WWMEBGDS? What would Jesus Christ do/say?/What would Sigmund Freud do/say? What Would My Ex-Boyfriend or –Girlfriend Do/Say? Answer one of these questions without asking this question, preferably without mentioning the names.
  15. Refer to yourself by a real nickname someone has given you in the third person.
  16. Make a prediction about a specific year in the future that you think is bold.
  17. Interview someone to comment on #3, #4, #8, #9, #14. Use a direct quote or a block quote or dialogue exchange.
  18. Using Google or another internet search engine, look up an important word or term from your your essay and either search for the latest news item (Google News) or the “I Feel Lucky” feature. Describe the results without saying you used this feature.
  19. Mention any current world leader by name in any context anywhere in the essay.
  20. Close the essay with an image or a statement that “echoes” 1, 4, 6, 8, 16, 17.

    1 Comment

    Filed under Writing Prompts

    The Substantial Word Riff; Or, the On Being Blue opening sentence imitation

    The author Annie Dillard (Pilgrim at Tinker Creek) tells the story of a student who approached a famous writer and asked if she, too, could ever be a writer, to which the famous writer replied with another question: “Do you like sentences?”

    In this revision exercise, you will find and expand upon a single, important word in one of your pieces, and explore every single incarnation, meaning, implication, connotation, and historical relevance you can find—all in one sentence.  We will use as your model the opening sentence to the opening sentence to William Gass’s 1979 book On Being Blue, a philosophical-essay-treatise that explores—you guessed it—all things blue.

    Here’s the close reading in PDF form.

    How does one go about writing as long and substantial sentence as Gass’s?  By building it one phrase and clause at a time.

    Here are some prompts; let letter X=your substantial word.

    The etymology of X–Word history, word orgins, meanings in other languages and phrases, parts of speech (verb, noun, adjective);

    The connotations of X–uses of X in slang, subcultures, soundalikes, puns, double-entendre;

    The metaporical uses of X—in other words, X is _________ (sound, person, object, sports position, which member of Beatles, season, film, song, weather, part of body);

    The metaphorical weight of X—examples of X used in phrases, sentences in different contexts;

    The cultural implications of X—examples in titles, dialogue, passages of literature, song lyrics, consumer names;

    Who is associated with X—which occupations, trades, faiths, sports, use X in particular contexts

    Personal associations with X—mentions of personal mythology, family, most familiar incarnations.

    And here is an example of possible long sentence outline, roughly from Gass’s sentence; each line below is an independent clause.

    __________4___________ ;  (list, etymologies of X)

    __________2___________ ;  (connotations of X)

    __________1___________ ;  (incarnations of X across cultures)

    __________3_______—_______—_____;  (cultural implications, more lists about X)

    __________3___________; (foreign phrase from X, metaphorical weight)

    __________4___________ ; (who is assocated with X)

    __________1___________ ;  (personal association, direct statement about X)

    Comments Off

    Filed under Revision Techniques, Writing Prompts

    Revision Technique: Put Your Writing in Reverse Or, “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button”–izing Your Writing

    This revision technique is named after the short story and movie of the same name.

    1. Select an entire piece of writing.

    2. Depending on the piece’s length and systems of division—sections, paragraphs, lines of poems—re-organize your piece in reverse.  For this step, all that is necessary is the cutting-and-pasting. Example: The last paragraph of a prose piece is now the first, the next-to-the-last paragraph is now the second, et cetera.

    3. Find a new organizing principle(s) that would make the piece work or “make sense” in this new order.  Some of these organizing principles might include: Divide the piece into sections, adjust verb tenses, or provide transitional phrases or new section titles that guide the reader as much as you see fit.

    Comments Off

    Filed under Revision Techniques, Writing Prompts

    Use an Oblique Strategy

    More than 30 years ago, recording artist and record producer Brian Eno—who has worked with U2, Talking Heads, Coldplay, David Bowie—and artist Peter Schmidt compiled a set of cards with odd messages on them to spark creativity.  Called “Oblique Strategies: Over One Hundred Worthwhile Dilemmas,” Eno and Schmidt’s cards have been used by artists of all stripes to re-think whatever creative work they were looking to revise.

    These cards evolved from our separate observations of the principles underlying what we are doing. Sometimes they were recognized in retrospect (intellect catching up with intuition), sometimes they were identified as they were happening, sometimes they were formulated. They can be used as a pack (a set of possibilities being continuously reviewed in the mind) or by drawing a single card from a shuffled pack when a dilemma occurs in a working situation. In this case the card is trusted even if it appropriateness is quite unclear. They are not final, as new ideas will present themselves, and others will become self-evident.

    Seek out or think up a problem or dilemma or ongoing issue in revising your piece.  You may not like the order of the lines of a poem, for example, or a piece of prose seems to drag on too long or needs some radical or small revision you have not found out about yet.

    1. Think about this problem or dilemma some more.  Write down what the “problem” is.
    2. Pick an Oblique Strategy at random, or have someone select one or a few for you. Find them online here. If this link doesn’t work, google “oblique strategies.”
    3. Follow the Oblique Strategy’s directions, however you interpret it to be.  Important: Do not mention what the Oblique Strategy is in your revision.

    If you own or have access to a smartphone (Droid, iPhone, etc.), there are some pretty great Oblique Strategy apps that emulate shuffling a deck and selecting a card. [iPhone] [Oblique Strategies for MAC] [Google Play store for Droid]

    Comments Off

    Filed under Revision Techniques, Writing Prompts

    Second-Guessing on Paper and the Rhetoric of Process

    In Style as Argument: Contemporary American Nonfiction (Carbondale: University of Illinois Press, 1987), Chris Anderson cites one of the ways nonfiction writers serve their rhetorical ends is to engage in what he calls the “rhetoric of process.” Be writing in a highly tentative manner, Anderson says, one that is grounded in the process of the moment, the writer engages readers and places them in the moment of writing alongside the writer.

    Or, as R. Lane Kauffman writes in his essay “Essaying as Unmethodical Method,” “the rhetorical function of essaying is not merely to transmit the essayist’s thoughts but to convey the feeling of their movement and thereby to induce an experience of thought in the reader…the crucial thing about the essay’s judgment is not the verdict but the process of judging.”

    The idea here is that, instead of merely erasing the initial writing, judgments, and thoughts, which would leave us merely with what the writer thinks is a more definitive observation, the writer retains parts of those initial drafting. This in turn gives us the mimetic impression of thinking happening as the writing is happening.  “The parentheticals, repeated predicates, multiple conjunctions, and cumulative modifications,” Anderson writes, help “reflect this spontaneity.”

    A writer second-guesses after he or she writes as well, of course.  And that’s what this revision technique is all about.  Although inspired by Anderson’s ideas about nonfiction, this can apply to revision of just about any mode of writing.

    1. Look for a direct statement in your piece, a place where you are making a point, general or specific (“I walked across the street”);  describe an action, event or observation in the plainest of terms (“The traffic was heavy”); or a passage where you outline or interpret something (“The Thruway is at its most difficult this time of day”).

    2. Amend this statement with a modification or clarification.  Or try to outline an alternative or opposing view. Some possible prompts:
    What I mean is _____.

    I think what I mean is _____.

    Stop./Let me back-up./Let me explain./It’s time to explain.

    Maybe what is happening here is _____.

    Let me give this another try./: _____.

    Another way to look at X. is ______.

    Or ______.

    Put another way, ______.

    On the other hand, ______.

    Other might say ______.

    Not everyone thinks this way. ______.

    I know that this isn’t the only way to look at X. ______.

    3. Repeat as needed.

    Comments Off

    Filed under Revision Techniques, Writing Prompts

    Revision Technique: Fight Clutter and Eliminate Adjectives

    In On Writing Well: An Informal Guide to Writing Nonfiction, William Zinsser defines “clutter” in writing as “ponderous euphemisms,” “the official language of the American corporation,” “the language of the interoffice memo,” and “the language of the Pentagon throwing dust in the eyes of its populace by calling an invasion a “reinforced reaction strike.””

    Strong words, to be sure; but when we are working in many modes of creative nonfiction, it’s best to develop skills that work on cutting out clutter and getting to the point of what we mean, rather than avoiding or obscuring meaning.

    One example is the adjective.  Adjectives, Ben Yagoda writes in When You Catch an Adjective, Kill It: The Parts of Speech for Better and/or Worse, writes that “kicking things off with adjectives is a little like starting a kids’ birthday party with the broccoli course.”

    “If your nouns are simple, your verbs active, and your pronouns are in good order,” Jacques Barzun writes in Simple & Direct: A Rhetoric for Writers, “then you owe it to your readers and yourself to be strict with your modifiers.”

    Although they only make up 6% of all the words in 100-million-word British National Corpus database of the English language, writers crutch on using adjectives instead of describing something precisely.

    “They’re called ‘weasel words.”—Esther, speaking of her 10th grade English teacher.

    Examples of overused adjectives are legion: innocent bystander, unique position, beautiful day, dark night, blue sky, infectious beat, worrying speech, wild woods, fathomless depths, terrific fireworks display, tall skyscraper, happy smile, babbling brook, gorgeous man or woman…the list could go on. Taken over time, the overall effect of adjective over usage is to slow down one’s writing almost to a halt.  A complete halt.

    1. Look at a passage of your writing that seems slowed down, that isn’t getting to the point.

    2. Underline all of your adjectives.

    3.  One by one, read aloud or to yourself what that sentence would be like with the adjectives or without.

    4.  If you feel that you are losing something by taking out the adjective, consider inserting more descriptive, active writing—a phrase or sentence—in its place.  Instead of writing about a “fancy party,” consider describing the restaurant itself: “waiters walked around carrying bottles of champagne and caterers served filet mignon and fresh salmon.”

    Helpful Hints:

    There are two main kinds of adjectives: attributive adjectives normally appear directly before the noun they describe, and predicative nouns appear after the verb form of to be or become or seem.

    Adjectives run the gamut from verb forms (“driving rain,” “barking dog”), words created by suffixes (-ific, -ive, -ous, -ful, -less, -ic), words that are both nouns and adjectives.

    A reliable test of whether a word is a full-fledged adjective, Yagoda writes, is whether it can be modified by an adverb, such as very, almost, or absolutely.

    Comments Off

    Filed under Revision Techniques, Writing Prompts

    The Fake Translation

    1.  Take a passage of your piece or your whole piece and copy into an online translation page (babelfish.yahoo.com or translate.google.com).

    2. Paste your original text in, and translate into a non-English language. Romance languages seem to work best (i.e., choose English to French, English to Italian, English to Spanish, English to Romanian).

    3. Paste the results and translate back into English.  Notice how the syntax/word order and whole words have changed.

    4.  Clean up and rewrite with the new words and order provided.

    Here’s my paragraph put from English to French and then back to English again looks like:

    One cut-up is a technique which means exactly during qu’ it indicates: an inscription “cuts” l’ writing to make the random connections and juxtapositions. If it resounds as jump-crossed in films and of the musical vidéos, or how the flick the switch of channel at the house, it took the surrealist movement France with d’ access present him, the painter and l’ author Brion Gysin to refine l’ idea of cut up in the Fifties. Gysin associated later with l’ American author William S. Burroughs to work with the whole books of cut-rises, a whole effort to decode the material’ ; S “contained implicit, supposing qu’ such a technique could be employed to discover the true significance d’ a given text. ”

    The ideas for these revision exercises are adapted from:

    Bernstein, Charles. “Experiments.” 20 April 2008 <http://www.writing.upenn.edu/bernstein/
    experiments.html
    >.

    Comments Off

    Filed under Revision Techniques, Writing Prompts

    Revision Technique: Cut-Ups, New School Edition

    1.  On-screen, select and copy a passage of your piece or the entire work.

    2.  Paste your text into an online cut-up engine.

    3.  Paste the results into your document.

    4.  Re-edit according to your new order.

     


    Before:

    A cut-up is a technique that means exactly as it says: a write “cuts up” writing to make random connections and juxtapositions.  If it sounds like jump-cuts in movies and music videos, or how flick the channel changer at home, it took the Surrealist movement France to first introduce it, painter and writer Brion Gysin to refine the idea of the cut-up in the 1950s. Gysin later teamed up with American writer William S. Burroughs to work on whole books of cut-ups, all an effort to decode the material’s “implicit content, hypothesizing that such a technique could be used to discover the true meaning of a given text.”

     

    After (raw result from the Lazarus online cut-up machine):

    Hypothesizing that such a technique it took the surrealist movement france meaning of a given text.”  juxtapositions.  if it sounds like could be used to discover the true exactly as it says: a write “cuts up” s. burroughs to work on whole books of writing to make random connections and to first introduce it, painter and material’s “implicit content, teamed up with american writer william jump-cuts in movies and music videos, or the cut-up in the 1950s. gysin later a cut-up is a technique that means how flick the channel changer at home, writer brion gysin to refine the idea of cut-ups, all an effort to decode the

    After (raw result from Gary Leeming’s “cutup machine”):

    means exactly as it says: a random connections and juxtapositions.  If and music videos, or how flick took the Surrealist movement France to Brion Gysin to refine the idea Gysin later teamed up with American on whole books of cut-ups, all “implicit content, hypothesizing that such a the true meaning of a given A cut-up is a technique that write “cuts up” writing to make it sounds like jump-cuts in movies the channel changer at home, it first introduce it, painter and writer of the cut-up in the 1950s. writer William S. Burroughs to work an effort to decode the material’s technique could be used to discover text.”

    The Language is a Virus site has a cut-up machine.

     

     

    Comments Off

    Filed under Revision Techniques, Writing Prompts

    Revision Technique: Cut-Ups, Old School Edition

    A cut-up is a technique that means exactly as it says: a write “cuts up” writing to make random connections and juxtapositions.  If it sounds like jump-cuts in movies and music videos, or how flick the channel changer at home, it took the Surrealist movement France to first introduce it, painter and writer Brion Gysin to refine the idea of the cut-up in the 1950s. Gysin later teamed up with American writer William S. Burroughs to work on whole books of cut-ups, all an effort to decode the material’s “implicit content, hypothesizing that such a technique could be used to discover the true meaning of a given text.”

    This technique is at once one of the more experimental and also one of the most straightforward.


    1.  Print out your piece and cut up each sentence or paragraph.

    2.  Throw down on ground.

    3.  Pick up.

    4.  Re-edit according to your new order.

    Comments Off

    Filed under Revision Techniques, Writing Prompts

    Revision Technique: Three-Act Revision

    Syd Field, author of Screenplay and The Screen Writer’s Workbook, has outlined a paradigm that most screenplays follow. A paradigm is a conceptual scheme. This paradigm is the structure that holds screenplays together. According to Field, screenplays follow a three-act structure, meaning the standard screenplay can be divided into three parts: Setup, Confrontation, and Resolution.

    Act I comprises the first quarter of the screenplay. (For a two hour movie, Act I would last approximately 30 minutes.)

    Act II comprises the next two quarters of the film. (For a two hour movie, Act II would last approximately 60 minutes.)

    Act III comprises the final quarter of the film. (For a two hour movie, Act III would be the final 30 minutes.)

    The “Plot Point”–According to Field, the three acts are separated by two plot points. A plot point, often called a reversal, is an event that thrusts the plot in a new direction, leading into a new act of the screenplay. Later screenplay gurus have built on Field’s theory by stating that Plot Point #1, which leads into Act II, is the moment when the hero takes on the problem.

    Comments Off

    Filed under Revision Techniques, Writing Prompts

    Revision Technique: Five-Act Narrative Revision II

    Douglas Whynott (that’s his real name) comes up with some great tips in his article “Some Thoughts in Nonfiction Book Structures” (The Writer’s Chronicle, May/Summer 2008. 66-71). One is to divide your piece into a five-part structure.  It’s akin to a five-act structure, but for the entire piece, and does not adhere as rigidly to dramaturgical rules.  He uses Tracy Kidder’s House as his example:


    I. Introductory development

    II. Biographical digression

    III. Complication

    IV. Crisis and climax

    V. Resolution

    Whynott tries to explain the principles behind and relationships among these five Parts as it relates to House; these may sound confusing or random to some, or it might give you some ideas in setting up relations among the elements of your story.

    There is a relationship between I and V.

    Parts II and IV in a five-part structure also often tend to be in oppositional relationships, but in a diametrical way.

    Parts II and IV tend to have a low-and-high opposition.

    Part II is almost always some sort of digression, while Part IV tends to reach the highest point of tension or some other form of climax.

    The psychological story that has been developing since Part I also comes to its highest pitch in Part IV.

    In a five-part structure, the Part III tends to sit on its own as the body of the structure, or the vehicle on which the book rides. I and II, introduction and digression, are on one side, with IV and V, climax and resolution on the other.

    Part III carries the load or does the heavy work.

    There rules are all rather random, Whynott eventually concludes, but dividing up the elements of one’s writing into helps.  “It’s the artful part that drives this writing,” he writes.

    The structures are merely paths, with some very old and familiar markers along the way. Writing is structural, and any structure that attempts to be art, attempts to be literature, has an inherent aesthetic, whether it be based on three, four, twelve parts, or eighty-six. That presence is the result of choices made by the writer based on his or her response to the material, and the final grace reflects the structure of that individual soul. I find it fascinating to look at and think about the relationships, as well as to occasionally hold some conjured up sequence in my own mind.

    In this revision technique, you will take your entire piece apart and put it back together again.  Cut your piece paragraph by paragraph—either on-screen, with paper and scissors, or by giving each paragraph a number or name.  Then assign each paragraph section its Part or Act described above.  Imagine re-writing the pieces to fit into the above criteria.  Make placeholders for sections not yet written—such as “crisis and climax.”

    Comments Off

    Filed under Revision Techniques, Writing Prompts